PREVIOUS SECTION Go back to sections Go back to the chapter Go back to the N.J. Statutes homepage NEXT SECTION


New Jersey Statutes, Title: 52, STATE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENTS AND OFFICERS

    Chapter 17B: Establishment of department; "the department" defined

      Section: 52:17B-196: Findings, declarations relative to joint negotiations by physicians and dentists with carriers.

          
1. The Legislature finds and declares that:

a. Active, robust and fully competitive markets for health care and dental services provide the best opportunity for the residents of this State to receive high-quality health care and dental services at an appropriate cost;

b. A substantial amount of health care and dental services in this State is purchased for the benefit of patients by health and dental insurance carriers engaged in the financing of health care and dental services or is otherwise delivered subject to the terms of agreements between carriers and physicians and dentists;

c. Carriers are able to control the flow of patients to physicians and dentists through compelling financial incentives for patients in their health and dental benefits plans to utilize only the services of physicians and dentists with whom the carriers have contracted;

d. Carriers also control the health care and dental services rendered to patients through utilization management and other managed care tools and associated coverage and payment policies;

e. Carriers are often able to virtually dictate the terms of the contracts that they offer physicians and dentists and commonly offer these contracts on a take-it-or-leave-it basis;

f. The power of carriers to unilaterally impose provider contract terms jeopardizes the ability of physicians and dentists to deliver the superior quality health care and dental services traditionally available in this State;

g. Physicians and dentists do not have sufficient market power to reject unfair provider contract terms offered by carriers that impede their ability to deliver medically appropriate care without undue delay or difficulties;

h. Inadequate reimbursement and other unfair payment terms offered by carriers adversely affect the quality of patient care and access to care by reducing the resources that physicians and dentists can devote to patient care and decreasing the time that physicians and dentists are able to spend with their patients;

i. Inequitable reimbursement and other unfair payment terms also endanger the health care infrastructure and medical progress by diverting capital needed for reinvestment in the health care delivery system, curtailing the purchase of state-of-the-art technology, the pursuit of medical research, and expansion of medical services, all to the detriment of the residents of this State;

j. The inevitable collateral reduction and migration of the health care work force will also have negative consequences for the economy of this State;

k. Empowering independent physicians and dentists to jointly negotiate with carriers as provided in this act will help restore the competitive balance and improve competition in the markets for health care and dental services in this State, thereby providing benefits for consumers, physicians and dentists and less dominant carriers;

l. This act is necessary and proper, and constitutes an appropriate exercise of the authority of this State to regulate the business of insurance and the delivery of health care and dental services;

m. The pro-competitive and other benefits of the joint negotiations and related joint activity authorized by this act, including, but not limited to, restoring the competitive balance in the market for health care services, protecting access to quality patient care, promoting the health care infrastructure and medical progress, and improving communications, outweigh any potential anti-competitive effects of this act; and

n. It is the intention of the Legislature to authorize independent physicians and dentists to jointly negotiate with carriers and to qualify such joint negotiations and related joint activities for the State-action exemption to the federal antitrust laws through the articulated State policy and active supervision provided under this act.

L.2001,c.371,s.1; per s.15, act expires April 8, 2008.



This section added to the Rutgers Database: 2012-09-26 13:37:55.






Older versions of 52:17B-196 (if available):



Court decisions that cite this statute: CLICK HERE.

©2005 Rutgers University School of Law - Newark, 123 Washington Street, Newark, NJ 07102
Rutgers School of Law Rutgers University-Newark Support the Law
Library