Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 C.V. v. Waterford Township Board of Education -- rank: 855

... the institutions and foundation of a free democratic State.” N.J.S.A. 10:5-3. The Legislature also explicitly found that “because of discrimination ...

docket:	a-24-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-09-12
status:
citation:
Document Size:	77948

17 JANET ROWAN v. HARTFORD PLAZA LTD -- rank: 844

... with other protections available under the laws of this State," N.J.S.A. 10:5-3. By enacting the LAD, the Legislature intended to "eradicate[e ...

docket:	a0107-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55314

18 Cavuoti v. New Jersey Transit Corporation -- rank: 829

... catalogued the various harms suffered by victims of discrimination. See N.J.S.A. 10:5-3. The Legislature found that �[s]uch harms have, under the ...

docket:	a-17-98
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-08-10
status:
citation:	161 N.J. 107
Document Size:	82971

19 NAACP OF CAMDEN COUNTY EAST v. FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP -- rank: 829

... and color, is a significant matter of public concern. See N.J.S.A. 10:5-3. The LAD consequently makes it unlawful for "any place of ...

docket:	a1230-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-02
status:	published
citation:	421 N.J. Super. 404 24 A.3d 777
Document Size:	117530

20 OASIS THERAPEUTIC LIFE CENTERS, INC v. PETER G. WADE -- rank: 824

... s provisions, L.W., 189 N.J. at 400; accord N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 (declaring 'this act shall be liberally construed in combination with ...

docket:	a0711-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-10
status:	Published
citation:	457 N.J.Super. 218 198 A.3d 1015
Document Size:	39875

21 PETER INNES v. MADELINE MARZANO-LESNEVICH ESQ. -- rank: 815

... 5-1 to -42, and the then recently-enacted amendment, N.J.S.A. 10:5-3, that specifically recognized "emotional stress" as cognizable damages under the ...

docket:	a0387-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-07
status:	published
citation:	435 N.J.Super. 198 87 A.3d 775
Document Size:	159851

22 MARY RICHTER v. OAKLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 806

... reinstated Richter's LAD claim, the statute permits punitive damages. N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 provides: The Legislature further finds that because of discrimination, people ... under the laws of this state.' Id. at 586 (citing N.J.S.A. 10:5-3); see also Royster, 227 N.J. at 500-01. Accordingly ...

docket:	a0102-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-11
status:	Published
citation:	459 N.J.Super. 400 211 A.3d 1226
Document Size:	58004

23 JOSEPH PRINCIPE v. PRC MANAGEMENT CO INC -- rank: 798

... among other things, age, when making hiring or termination decisions. N.J.S.A. 10:5-3; 10:5-12(a). The LAD does not bar "the ...

docket:	a0450-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47125

24 Mid-Atlantic LLC v. Robert University -- rank: 798

... in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 and N.J.S.A. 10:5-13; (2) breach ... the basis of "race, creed, color, national origin . . . or nationality[.]" N.J.S.A. 10:5-3. Because "[t]he LAD is remedial social legislation . . . it should ...

docket:	a0294-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53480

25 PATRICIA SOLIMAN v. THE KUSHNER COMPANIES INC -- rank: 792

... with other protections available under the laws of this State. [ N.J.S.A. 10:5-3.] In our view, and most importantly consistent with the Court ... hardships," similar in kind and scope to those codified in N.J.S.A. 10:5-3, if plaintiffs can show a causal link between defendants' intrusion ...

docket:	a5397-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-17
status:	published
citation:	433 N.J.Super. 153 77 A.3d 1214
Document Size:	76341

26 CARMENA STONEY v. MAPLE SHADE TOWNSHIP -- rank: 789

... 12133; 28 C.F.R. § 36.504(a)(1); N.J.S.A. 10:5-3, -13, the question raised by this appeal is whether the ... intentional.") The LAD, of course, permits recovery of compensatory damages. N.J.S.A. 10:5-3, -13. 11 As noted, the standards under the ADA are ...

docket:	a1777-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-11
status:	published
citation:	426 N.J. Super. 297 44 A.3d 601
Document Size:	77197

27 Fernando Roa and Liliana Roa v. LAFE and Marino Roa -- rank: 789

... specifically expressed an intent that the LAD "be liberally construed," N.J.S.A. 10:5-3, reading into the statute an unstated exclusion cannot be countenanced ...

docket:	a-72-08
court:	supreme
decided:	2010-01-14
status:
citation:
Document Size:	99383

28 EILEEN GALLO V. SALESIAN SOCIETY, INC ET AL -- rank: 786

... menaces the institutions and foundation of a free democratic State . . .�. ��������[ N.J.S.A. 10:5-3.] Amici also suggest the practical significance of a ruling that ... court may suspend the running of such prejudgment interest. In N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 the Legislature found that "people suffer personal hardships" because of ...

docket:	a5488-93
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-05-17
status:	published
citation:	290 N.J.Super. 616
Document Size:	103901

29 LORENZO SHOCKLEY v. THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 780

... national origin, ancestry, age, sex, or nationality, among other things. N.J.S.A. 10:5-3. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' Us, Inc. , 132 N.J. 587 ...

docket:	a3212-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	83014

30 DAVID F. CALABOTTA , v. PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION -- rank: 778

... this ambiguity undercuts plaintiff's interpretation. The preamble, found at N.J.S.A. 10:5-3, states in relevant part: The Legislature finds and declares that ... discrimination when directed against any person,' not solely against inhabitants. N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 (emphasis added). The third paragraph further declares that because of ...

docket:	a1576-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-27
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	80633