Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

121 MARK HYMAN v. YELENA MELNICHENKO -- rank: 584

... counsel fees and costs as a "prevailing party" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 10:6 2(f). Plaintiff did not withdraw the lawsuit and Longport moved ... to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 and N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(f). On March 4, 2016, Judge Bronkesh denied the motion ... award the prevailing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs." N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(f). As Longport candidly points out, the NJCRA was modeled ...

docket:	a3279-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29733

122 AZUOWOH ROTIMI v. BROCK RUSSELL -- rank: 584

... act), and violations of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act, N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c) (in pertinent part, authoring a civil action to any ...

docket:	a2155-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29766

123 PAUL D. MCLEMORE v. EUNICE SAMUELS -- rank: 579

... in violation of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act (NJCRA), N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c). In count three, plaintiff alleged that defendants conspired to ... to procedural due process. Indeed, as the court pointed out, N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c) only recognizes claims for the deprivation of "substantive due ...

docket:	a5398-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27592

124 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4560-19.opn.html -- rank: 577

... or coercion by a person acting under color of law . . . . [N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c).] While the NJCRA does not explicitly contain or refer ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	36977

125 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2869-16.opn.html -- rank: 577

... reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party. N.J.S.A. 10:6- 2(f); see also Tumpson, 218 N.J. at 479. Defendants ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	55042

126 NICHOLAS KRAMER v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 572

... the New Jersey Constitution, the New Jersey Civil Rights Act, N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c), and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N ...

docket:	a3373-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31073

127 MICHAEL A. VALLONE v. TOWNSHIP OF HOLMDEL POLICE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 569

... second, they violated the New Jersey Civil Rights Act (NJCRA), N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c); and lastly, they violated the Federal Civil Rights Act ... action for damages and for injunctive or other appropriate relief. [ N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c).] Plaintiff does not dispute "that the arrest itself . . . in ...

docket:	a1452-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39139

128 CHABAD OF OLD TAPPAN INC v. BOROUGH OF OLD TAPPAN -- rank: 567

... state law claim for attorney's fees and costs under N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(e) and (f), provisions of the New Jersey Civil Rights ... TO] THE PROVISIONS OF THE NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, N.J.S.A. 10:6-2, DEFENDANT'S VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF PLAINTIFF TO THE ... costs relies on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and N.J.S.A. 10:6-2. Having carefully reviewed the record and the precedents interpreting those ...

docket:	a4375-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16636

129 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH HUNTERDON REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC QUESTION -- rank: 567

... III alleged violations of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act, N.J.S.A. 10:6- - 2. The election contest was based on the following allegations: illegal ...

docket:	a3178-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34364

130 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1967-20.opn.html -- rank: 562

... her pupils and cited her failure to follow directives. 1 N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c). A-1967-20 2 Subsequently, Dr. Cooper recommended the ... action for damages and for injunctive or other appropriate relief. [N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c).] The first task in asserting a substantive due process ...

docket:
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	28679

131 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2431-20.opn.html -- rank: 562

... s Constitution and laws.' Gormley, 218 N.J. at 97. N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c) provides a private cause of action for violations of ... Tumpson v. Farina, 218 N.J. 450, 473 (2014) (quoting N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c)); see also Lapolla v. Cnty. of Union, 449 N ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	29665

132 CHRISTOPHER OBCHINETZ -- rank: 562

... was a "catalyst" for the repeal of the ordinances. See N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(f) (providing for, in addition to other relief, an award ...

docket:	a4289-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37150

133 KIRK SPARKS v. ERIC BARNES -- rank: 557

... Jersey Civil Rights Act (CR A-3117-21 5 Act), N.J.S.A. 10:6-2. Plaintiff contended that defendants had misrepresented the facts of the ...

docket:	a3117-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-11-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23531

134 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0330-15a0331-15a0333-15.opn.html -- rank: 557

... 1988, and the New Jersey Civil Rights Act (the Act), N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(f). After the defendants filed the appeal, the State sought ... to the federal statute, also contains a fee-shifting provision, N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(f). It states: 'In addition to any damages, civil penalty ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	45636

135 ADRIANE WILLIAMS v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON COUNTY -- rank: 557

... bring a civil action for damages . . . or other appropriate relief.' N.J.S.A. 10:6-2(c). This statute was modeled after 42 U.S.C ...

docket:	a3241-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20872