Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 BI-COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 714

... public's interest in development activity," as set forth in N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2. The petition also argued that "an exceptional resource value classification ...

docket:	a1047-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-10-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35080

17 ZRB, LLC - v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAND USE REGULATION -- rank: 683

... the wetlands should not be classified as exceptional resource value. N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2. Freshwater wetlands of "exceptional resource value" are identified as wetlands ...

docket:	a6046-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-11-17
status:	published
citation:	403 N.J. Super. 531
Document Size:	81459

18 IN RE FRESHWATER WETLANDS GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 16., etc. -- rank: 635

... could affect those waters. 33 U.S.C.A. § 1344; N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2, -9. Pursuant to the federal grant of authority, the DEP ...

docket:	A1343-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-07-29
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	63773

19 IN RE FRESHWATER WETLANDS GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 16. etc. -- rank: 624

... could affect those waters. 33 U.S.C.A. § 1344; N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2, -9. Pursuant to the federal grant of authority, the DEP ...

docket:	a5124-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-07-29
status:	published
citation:	379 N.J. Super. 331
Document Size:	61613

20 DARWIN R. GRIFFITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, -- rank: 622

... temporary taking; and awarding plaintiff a counsel fee pursuant to N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2. Plaintiff's dealings from that point on were with the ...

docket:	a6079-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-05-15
status:	published
citation:	340 N.J. Super. 596
Document Size:	36659

21 IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTED AMENDMENTS TO N.J.A.C. 7:7A-2.4 -- rank: 609

... the [Corps] pursuant to the Federal Act and implementing regulations." N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2 (footnote omitted). DEP was designated as the agency responsible for ...

docket:	A0228-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-12-23
status:	published
citation:	365 N.J. Super. 255 839 A.2d 60
Document Size:	28195

22 TANURB v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 581

... that the site provided no flood or storm damage protection. N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2 provides: The Legislature finds and declares that freshwater wetlands protect ...

docket:	a5297-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2003-10-29
status:	published
citation:	363 N.J. Super. 492 363 N.J. Super. 492
Document Size:	26910

23 Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of Paulsboro -- rank: 553

... essential habitat for a major portion of New Jersey wildlife. N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2. The Legislature also found that “the public benefits arising from ...

docket:	a-51-06
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-06-13
status:
citation:	191 N.J. 344
Document Size:	52050

24 SAMUEL L. DOYAL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 459

... We conclude that it is clear on the face of N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2. "The CWA authorized states to assume the regulatory responsibilities of ...

docket:	a4839-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-01-24
status:	published
citation:	390 N.J. Super. 185
Document Size:	25945

25 WALTER DZIOBEK v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 339

... contribute to the hydrological balance of the system." Ibid. See N.J.S.A. 13:9B-2. Thus, where the physical connection is undisputed, it is up ...

docket:	A1107-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-10-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44171