Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

286 PEDRO GONZALEZ v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 348

... third of the higher maximum available under either policy. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(c). This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...

docket:	a1877-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15593

287 EDWARD ZABILOWICZ v. ROSLYNE KELSEY -- rank: 315

... the accident. The injuries do not vault the verbal threshold. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the deemer statute does not ... these standards, we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 requires an out-of-state insurer authorized to do ...

docket:	a3850-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-01-14
status:	unpublished
citation:	198 N.J. 474 968 A.2d 1190
Document Size:	21978

288 CAMIE LIVSEY v. MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 282

... by an intentional act may qualify as an "'accident' under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1," thereby entitling plaintiff to UM benefits. Id. at 569 ...

docket:	A1238-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-24
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	25399

289 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0519-18.opn.html -- rank: 262

... based on that court's view that the 'deemer statute,' N.J.S.A. 17:28- 1.4, did not require GEICO to provide New Jersey's ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	4109

290 DANIEL COX, Plaintiff v. JOSEPH P. RUSSELL and DANIEL GARCIA -- rank: 255

... at 327, when we pointed out that the language in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e(2), that an "'[u]ninsured motor vehicle' shall not ...

docket:	a4571-02
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-02-23
status:	published
citation:	367 N.J. Super. 121
Document Size:	16406

291 ADAM MARCHEVSKY v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 249

... and by the terms and conditions of the insurance policy. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1c "must be construed liberally to foster the protection UM ...

docket:	a3046-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-09-04
status:	unpublished
citation:	197 N.J. 15 960 A.2d 745
Document Size:	27891