Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY V. CNA INSURANCE COMPANY & SHELDON ROGERS -- rank: 496

... not exceed the limits of the General Accident policy. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(c). Since General Accident does not dispute its status as ...

docket:	a7615-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-07-15
status:	published
citation:	303 N.J.Super. 161
Document Size:	16024

137 MARGIE FELICIANO v. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 493

... Encompass Insurance Company, containing Uninsured Motorist Coverage (UM) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. On October 16, 2000, at approximately 8:30 p.m ...

docket:	a4562-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-04-24
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40144

138 MARIE ST. SURIN v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 488

... came from or was part of a motor vehicle. II N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) defines "underinsured motorist coverage" as "insurance for damages ... operation or use of an underinsured motor vehicle ." (Emphasis added). N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(2) defines, in relevant part, the term "uninsured motor ...

docket:	a1902-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22932

139 NOWELL JAMES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 488

... policy's "step-down" provision. Plaintiff countered by arguing that, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f), effective September 10, 2007, which essentially prohibited the use ... claim predicated upon an accident which predates the adoption of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f)." Id. at 506. Our colleagues in Hand , however, reached ...

docket:	a2108-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16068

140 LEO JOSEPH v. REGINALD T. WILLIAMS -- rank: 486

... The court based its decision on the plain language of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(2), which states in pertinent part: ''Uninsured motor 1 ...

docket:	a3271-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	5610

141 SUSAN KOZICZYNSKI, individually, et al. v. of RONALD JOHNSON, a minor -- rank: 486

... offset from UIM benefits, the panel in McShane relied on N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, holding that the following provisions had "overriding relevance": For the ...

docket:	a6535-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	18712

142 STEPHANIE WEAVER v. NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 486

... accidents that occur "anywhere within the United States or Canada." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a)(2). A policy that includes UM coverage as required ...

docket:	a4534-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30585

143 THOMAS J. SCATTERGOOD v. NEW JERSEY SKYLANDS INSURANCE COMPANIES - -- rank: 484

... Mercury Ins. Group , 197 N.J. 522 , 531 (2009).] See N.J.S.A . 17:28-1.1(a)(2) (requiring UM coverage for an injury "caused by ...

docket:	a4692-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35500

144 OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEWIS R. BORNSTEIN et al. -- rank: 481

... tortfeasor's policy precludes any claim for UIM coverage; (2) N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 requires the settlement with the tortfeasor to be reasonable in ...

docket:	A2870-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-02-06
status:	published
citation:	357 N.J. Super. 282 814 A.2d 117
Document Size:	13991

145 VANESSA RIVERA v. ELMER F. McCRAY, III -- rank: 481

... 183 N.J. 405 , 412 (2005), superseded in part by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f) (prohibiting step-down provisions in certain business auto insurance ...

docket:	a2337-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-02
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 315 137 A.3d 1226
Document Size:	30280

146 SIDNEY HOLMES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 474

... ran into plaintiff was not uninsured within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, we affirm. The facts essential to our disposition are undisputed ...

docket:	a3911-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17521

147 JOSEPH BERGAMO et al. v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 474

... coverage and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage are both codified in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. But there are important distinctions between UM and UIM coverage ...

docket:	a4536-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-14
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	30814

148 RONALD DANCHISKO v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 471

... N.J. 405 (2005), superseded by statute on other grounds , N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, L. 2007, c. 163, § 2, as recognized in Olkusz v ...

docket:	a1428-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63482

149 HETAL SHAH v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 469

... found in the same statute that governs UM coverage. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. "Under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b, UIM ...

docket:	a2216-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40086

150 FRANK SPATUCCI and ANNA SPATUCCI, husband et al. v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 464

... ambiguous, it's clear, it parrots the statutory language of [ N.J.S.A. 17-28-1.1] and therefore the motion shall be granted and the cross ... being operated on public roadways and was thus uninsured under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. We disagree. At the outset, we note that since the ... mainly for use off public roadways. Neither the policy nor N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, after which the language in the policy is patterned, identify ...

docket:	A0499-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-08-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26170