Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Robert Matthew Hurley, et al. -- rank: 645

... Progressive was not required to provide UM coverage pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 for a borrowed car neither registered nor principally garaged in ...

docket:	a-96-99
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-01-29
status:
citation:	166 N.J. 260
Document Size:	58205

62 LAWRENCE C. KARPER v. JOSE A. CALDERON -- rank: 643

... denied by order dated June 15, 2012. We conclude that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1), which defines UIM coverage, and case law which ... 544 , 561-62 (2015). New Jersey's UIM coverage statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1), "creates a framework within which one can purchase ... has recovered under all bodily injury liability insurance or bonds[.] [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1).] The most important distinguishing characteristics of UIM insurance ... liability insurance not the amount recovered by all injured parties. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1). For these reasons we conclude the motion judge ...

docket:	a4882-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-28
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	21005

63 OMAR SANDERS v. NORMA K. LANGEMEIER -- rank: 643

... shall not include a vehicle covered by a basic policy. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 was also amended to except the basic policy from the ...

docket:	a4335-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-19
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size:	51235

64 JOSE CARBAJAL v. NANCY V. PATEL -- rank: 640

... 1999-19 14 a UM provision since 1968.' Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1). But 'to collect under UM coverage, the claimant-insured must ...

docket:	a1999-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-06-02
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	46613

65 DOLORES KLEIBER v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO., et al. -- rank: 638

... to satisfy at least the ...uninsured motorist insurance requirements of [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1]. . . . [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4.] The minimum amount of UM coverage required under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 is $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident ... death of more than one person, in any one accident. . . . [ N.J.S.A . 17:28-1.1(a)(1) and (2).] The statute additionally provides: b. Uninsured ... liability policy limits for bodily injury and property damage, respectively. [ N.J.S.A . 17:28-1.1(b).] Accordingly, by reason of the operation of N.J ...

docket:	A1614-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26611

66 PATRICIA ENGRASSIA, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Jason Marles, Deceased v. ERICK UZCATEGUI and HUNTERDON MOTORS, INC d/b/a HUNTERDON BMW and FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN SADDY, SADDY FAMILY, LLC LASV, INC., and BAMBOO -- rank: 635

... by law. Id. at 400–01. The Court noted that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e) provides that [a] motor vehicle is underinsured when the ... 15,000. Id. at 404. The Court observed that under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b), the right to recover UIM benefits depends on the ...

docket:	a2755-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	84005

67 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a-43-17.opn.html -- rank: 633

... liability insurance is insufficient to reimburse the policyholder’s damages. N.J.S.A. 17:28- 1.1(e)(1); see also French v. N.J. Sch. Bd ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	64980

68 ROBERT and ANTONIA FLAHERTY v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 633

... down provision in Harleysville's policy was rendered unenforceable by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f). In reaching this result, the court concluded that the Legislature intended for N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f) to apply retroactively to any UIM claim filed at ... clause in the Harleysville policy was not enforceable pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f). The Legislature expressly adopted to overrule the Supreme Court ... 401 N.J. Super. 496 (App. Div. 2008), holding that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f) is to be applied prospectively only. Reversed. 1 Dalton ...

docket:	a3796-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15789

69 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2101-19.opn.html -- rank: 630

... required to provide uninsured motorist coverage under standard insurance policies. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a). In turn, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(c) provides in relevant part: If the insured had uninsured ... solely responsible for providing UM benefits to Frederick. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(c), USAA and Farmers must provide UM benefits on a ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34622

70 JANINE BALL v. CHARLES J. REESE -- rank: 630

... with Rite Aid. She points out that the UIM statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, does not contain language concerning a setoff for settlements made ... on behalf of 'anyone responsible' for a bodily injury. Rather, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) states, in more restrictive language, that '[t]he ... 2895-16T4 does not comport with the literal terms of N.J.S.A. 17:28- 1.1(e)(1). Despite plaintiff's arguments founded upon the literal ... specifically approved by the Department of Banking and Insurance. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(d) ('Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage shall be subject to ... policy endorsement, approved by the Commissioner of Insurance pursuant to N.J.S.[A.] 17:28-1.1(d), has been used by most of the insurers licensed ...

docket:	a2895-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26347

71 RAMON TOULSON v. JOSEPH HARTMAN -- rank: 623

... Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995). Under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1), A motor vehicle is underinsured when the sum ... App. Div. 1989) ('Under the explicit and unambiguous language of [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1)], the insureds' underinsured A-0103-22 7 motorist ... insurance or bonds.'). We explained that the last sentence of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) created a pro tanto setoff requirement. Nikiper, 232 ...

docket:	a0103-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-11-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16752

72 PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AN INSURANCE CARRIER v. ROBERT MATTHEW HURLEY & DEVIL ELEVEN, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, -- rank: 623

... Progressive was not required to provide UM coverage pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 for a borrowed car neither registered nor principally garaged in ... was labeled as a "Business Auto Policy." As required by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, a UM and UIM insurance endorsement was attached to the policy. However, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 requires a UM and UIM insurance provision only for vehicles ...

docket:	a7174-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-01-10
status:	published
citation:	327 N.J.Super. 179
Document Size:	13878

73 MARGARET SAMUEL VS JOHN DOE & ET ALS -- rank: 621

... of the MTF policy is rooted in the language of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. We are not persuaded by any of the three arguments ... MTF policy because the LeBaron is not an uninsured vehicle." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. I disagree, however, with their decision to relax Rule 4 ...

docket:	a3627-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-04-02
status:	published
citation:	309 N.J.Super. 406
Document Size:	23179

74 TIM & LIZ BROWN VS SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY & ET ALS -- rank: 618

... under a concurrent UM policy, falls in direct conflict with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1." Specifically, Atlantic points to the provisions of 108 N.J ...

docket:	a3280-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-05-04
status:	published
citation:	311 N.J.Super. 210
Document Size:	14725

75 TIMOTHY F. LONG v. MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 618

... to the Court's opinion by adding subsection f to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, known as the "Scutari Amendment." The amendment provides: A policy ...

docket:	a3238-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49761