Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 CHRISTOPHER COX v. KRYSTAL TOMASSO -- rank: 616

... underinsured compared to the coverage on plaintiff's motorcycle. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) (defining underinsured motor vehicle).2 However, plaintiff sought ... it is consistent with the purpose of the UIM statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b). That statute limits the purchase of UIM coverage to ... NJM's argument that either the coverage parity provisions of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b), or the motorcycle 6 We need not reach, and ...

docket:	a0106-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18587

77 DANIEL DIGIROLAMO v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 613

... in a personal policy "[ran] afoul of the provisions of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1" as written at that time). The statutory amendment prohibiting "step ...

docket:	a2962-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-04-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16958

78 WILLIAM SCHECKEL VS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 613

... 107-08 (discussing the UM statutory requirements set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1). See footnote 3     In this case, as in Norman , plaintiff ... s contention that the notice provisions in the policy violate N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 is without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E ... as a student at the University of Chicago. Footnote: 3 N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 requires every automobile liability policy issued in New Jersey to ...

docket:	a7095-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-11-13
status:	published
citation:	316 N.J.Super. 326
Document Size:	23270

79 United Services Automobile Association v. Timothy B. Turck -- rank: 611

... coverage to their insureds. L. 1968, c. 385 (codified at N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 and -1.2). The legislation had a two-fold purpose ...

docket:	a-168-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-12-17
status:
citation:	156 N.J. 480
Document Size:	43158

80 EDGAR GREEN, JR v. MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 603

... App. Div. 2005), certif. denied , 186 N.J. 244 (2006). N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e) provides that a motor vehicle is underinsured when the ...

docket:	a4036-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30264

81 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 601

... by law. Id. at 400-01. The Court noted that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e) states that [a] motor vehicle is underinsured when the ... 15,000. Id. at 404. The Court observed that, under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b), the right to recover UIM benefits depends on the ...

docket:	a3571-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29730

82 GUISEPE A. IELLIMO v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 599

... accident against the risk of injury caused by underinsured tortfeasors . N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b). An individual against whom recovery is sought after an ... vehicle insurance policy held by the person seeking that recovery.' N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1). A UIM carrier who pays benefits to an ...

docket:	a4975-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33052

83 CONSTANZA ZAMBRANA v. NATIONAL CONTINENTAL PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 596

... Bd. , 401 N.J. Super. 563 , 567 (App. Div. 2008). N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 governs statutorily-mandated UM coverage benefits. The statute provides in ...

docket:	a3903-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24533

84 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2707-17.opn.html -- rank: 596

... judgment in favor of defendant on January 10, 2018. I. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a)(2) provides that, no motor vehicle liability policy or ... use of such uninsured or hit and run motor vehicle[.] N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(2) defines an 'uninsured motor vehicle' as (a) a ... N.J. 493, 503-04 (1987). A-2707-17T3 7 ' N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 must be construed liberally to foster the protection UM affords ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	31953

85 MARK TLUMACKI v. CNA INSURANCE COMPANIES -- rank: 596

... We disagree. The duty to exhaust available coverage derives from N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1), which provides in pertinent part that "[a] motor ... In our judgment, the settlement satisfied plaintiff's obligation under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) to exhaust the limits of Hsu's policy ...

docket:	a4024-05
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49799

86 MARK TLUMACKI v. CNA INSURANCE COMPANIES -- rank: 596

... We disagree. The duty to exhaust available coverage derives from N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1), which provides in pertinent part that "[a] motor ... In our judgment, the settlement satisfied plaintiff's obligation under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) to exhaust the limits of Hsu's policy ...

docket:	a4249-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-31
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	48290

87 GEICO v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 594

... its pro-rata share of any arbitration award pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Specifically, Geico claimed the City should pay a pro-rata ... PROVIDE UM BENEFITS CONTINUES IN LIGHT OF THE AMENDMENTS TO N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, WHICH ELIMINATED MANDATORY UNINSURED MOTORISTS COVERAGE. In Christy , our Supreme ... basic policy" option as well. Because of the amendments to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 and the creation of the new "basic policy[,]"[] the City ...

docket:	a1442-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-12-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30598

88 STEVEN T. WALL, JR v. OCCIDENTAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 594

... App. Div. 2008), this court held that an amendment of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, enacted September 10, 2007, does not apply retroactively to motor ... abrogated the holding of Pinto by enacting the amendment of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 prohibiting step-down clauses in a business or corporate motor ... coverage for plaintiff under the employer's policy. Arguing that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. It held that the amendment would apply only prospectively to ...

docket:	a4454-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	23693

89 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4045-19.opn.html -- rank: 591

... mandatory minimum specified by the laws of New Jersey.' See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a)(1) (setting the mandatory minimum amount of bodily injury ... A. 39:6A-1 to -35, and the UIM statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 to -1.9. The discovery period was protracted by motion ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	22041

90 PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. CO., OF NEW JERSEY VS STATE FARM INS. CO. -- rank: 591

... the French decision makes clear that, subject to compliance with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, courts must enforce the plain language of the applicable insurance ...

docket:	a2752-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-12-19
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	18074