Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 IFA INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBERT E. HILL -- rank: 622

... state policy was reformed, by operation of the deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, 1 to include PIP coverage in these circumstances. We affirm ... or motor vehicle is used or operated in this State." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. This is a misreading of the statute, which does not ... opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. 1 N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 states: "Any insurer . . . controlling or controlled by, or under common ...

docket:	a5405-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14995

32 KEI NAM PARK VS EUN BAE PARK, DUCK JU KIM, ET AL -- rank: 614

... New Jersey are mandated by the so-called deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Since the reimbursement statute expressly includes PIP payments made pursuant ... to Chapter 6A of Title 39 or the deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. It is not disputed that Hunt and Chaney, as the ... A. 17:28-1.6. We agree.     The deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, adopted by L. 1985, c. 520, and technically amended by ...

docket:	a3922-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-03-12
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	17585

33 CRISTINA DELA VEGA v. THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 606

... 2020), a case involving a dispute over the 'deemer' statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, decided after the trial judge rendered her decision in this ...

docket:	a2272-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49861

34 DON WASHINGTON v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 606

... issue automobile insurance policies in New Jersey, plaintiff asserted that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (the Deemer Statute) applied and required reformation of his policy ... an out-of-state automobile policy is [not] deemed by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 to provide PIP benefits when the named insured is injured ... under the policy is used or operated in this State. [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (emphasis added).] 'The legislation was in response to a growing ... policy is used or operated in this State.' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4). We then noted by analogy that 'courts have examined 'the ...

docket:	a2422-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-10-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14098

35 JOHN BAKER v. J.J. DELUCA COMPANY, INC. -- rank: 606

... judge erred in concluding that New Jersey's deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, applies to it. In general, the deemer statute requires "[a ... required in New Jersey for accidents occurring in New Jersey. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Celadon argues that the deemer statute does not apply because ... the minimum required coverage under New Jersey law , including PIP. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. As a self-insured, considered to have issued an insurance ... vehicle insurance business in this State" within the terms of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Celadon should not be permitted to take advantage of its ...

docket:	a4922-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63441

36 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0980-17.opn.html -- rank: 604

... coverage approved by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance . 2 N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. A-0980-17T3 6 To the extent we have not ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11324

37 COACH USA, INC., CAPE TRANSIT CORPORATION AND LEISURE LINE, INC. v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 596

... injury protection coverage required to be provided in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4], or although required did not maintain personal injury protection or ... the bus passengers pursuant to New Jersey's deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, which requires carriers that do business here to afford the ...

docket:	A0250-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-10-01
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	18357

38 COUNTRY-WIDE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 596

... business in this state, and that it is required under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, the so called "deemer statute" See footnote 1 1 , to ... A. 39:6A-4, it would also be required, under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, to pay pro rata contribution to a carrier who under ...

docket:	A0366-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-01-23
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	23280

39 Whitaker v. DeVilla -- rank: 585

... proper interpretation and constitutionality of New Jersey's “deemer statute” ( N.J.S.A . 17:28-1.4), which deems New Jersey's “verbal threshold” to apply to ... instituted suit. Ibid. Keystone moved for summary judgment, contending that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 should not be construed to require Keystone to pay additional ... 486-88. The Law Division upheld the statute's constitutionality:              N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 not only subjects the class in question to the "verbal ...

docket:	a-60-96
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-02-03
status:
citation:	147 N.J. 341
Document Size:	53096

40 JOSE L. CHAVEZ v. THE PROFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 569

... to do business in New Jersey, it was obligated under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, commonly known as the "deemer" statute, to provide minimum coverage ... the Proformance policy as result of their motor vehicle accident. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 provides in pertinent part: [A]ny insurer authorized to transact ... policy and therefore subject to application of the deemer statute. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. II. In view of our determination that the Executive policy ...

docket:	a5665-06
court:
decided:	2008-08-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42147

41 21st CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION AS STATUTORY ADMINISTRATOR OF UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 529

... of Banking and Insurance that it was in compliance with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, and specifically with its provisions requiring mandatory coverage for pedestrian ...

docket:	a1773-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17976

42 DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GENNADIY GISIS -- rank: 524

... injury protection coverage required to be provided in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4], or although required did not maintain personal injury protection or ...

docket:	a0951-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 295 21 A.3d 216
Document Size:	20713

43 JOHN KARAMISAKIS v. MARK and CAROL BLUMBERG -- rank: 521

... applicable as the result of New Jersey's deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, which provides in relevant part: [A]ny insurer . . . controlling or ... appeal. The judge was not persuaded by the argument that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 requires the use or operation of the insured vehicle in ... Co. , 264 N.J. Super. 367 , 374 (App. Div. 1993) (" N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 applies only to 'automobiles' which are 'used or operated in ... 8a to Karamisakis through the operation of the deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. We do not address whether any other law serves to ...

docket:	a6904-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-11-28
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	49587

44 DOLORES KLEIBER v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO., et al. -- rank: 521

... Jersey. As the motion judge correctly noted, in these circumstances, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 applies. This statute, which is known as the "deemer" statute ... requirements of [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1]. . . . [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4.] The minimum amount of UM coverage required under N.J ... 1.1(b).] Accordingly, by reason of the operation of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, plaintiff is entitled under her Florida policy to the minimum ...

docket:	A1614-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26611

45 TUSHAR V. PATEL v. APRIL SIMS, et al. -- rank: 508

... support of the motion, defendant argued that plaintiff, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, otherwise known as the "deemer" statute, failed to pierce the ...

docket:	a6525-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-08-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40372