Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9")   16 to 23 of 23 results. Run time: 0.447 seconds | Search time: 0.443 seconds    
 Page:1 2 Previous 15
16 PLEASANTVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. PLEASANTVILLE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION -- rank: 628
... oversight of [the Board's] business operations and personnel matters[.]" N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9. Despite the proposed layoffs, the District would continue to satisfy ... the Board's decision to reduce the number of aides, N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9 provides: Nothing in this title or any other law relating ... sound fiscal management of the District. The arbitration award violates N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9 and ignores the monitor's role in maintaining the fiscal ...
docket: a2123-08
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-08-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47728
17 CHRISTOPHER CONCATO v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE RIVER DELL REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, BERGEN COUNTY - -- rank: 625
... Educ., 5 N.J. Super. 215, 218 (App. Div. 1949). N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9, provides: Nothing in this title or any other law relating ...
docket: a3066-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-08-14
status:
citation:
Document Size: 16505
18 LUCY KOURTESIS v. BERGEN COUNTY SPECIAL SERVICES SCHOOL DISTRICT -- rank: 614
... school year constituted a reduction in force (RIF) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9, and a violation of their tenure and seniority rights and ... 18A:28-5, and no RIF within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9. She found that the Board did not guarantee appellants, by ... relied on Alfieri to find there was no RIF under N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9 because appellants' had no guarantee of a minimum number of ...
docket: a2139-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-11-19
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21677
19 In the Matter of Robbinsville Township Board of Education v. Washington Township Education Association -- rank: 593
... to reduce the workforce by permanently laying off employees. See N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9 (providing right of “board of education to reduce the ...
docket: A-32-15
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2016-11-29
status:
citation: 227 N.J. 192 149 A.3d 1283
Document Size: 55278
20 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2602-18.opn.html -- rank: 533
... Bass concluded the Board instituted the RIF in accordance with N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9, which permits a board of education to reduce the number ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 16753
21 IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION) V. THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO -- rank: 434
... to both exercises. We disagree. While cutting staff pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9 would be permissible unilaterally without prior negotiations, [citations omitted] there ...
docket: a6096-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1995-12-01
status: published
citation: 285 N.J.Super. 541
Document Size: 31808
22 CONSTANCE CENTRELLA v. PROSPECT PARK BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 420
... language, which explained the reasons for the recommended action: WHEREAS, N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9 provides that a board of education has the right to ...
docket: a4186-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-05-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 12486
23 FRANCO COZZOLINO v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE -- rank: 360
... for reasons of economy, it must be based on seniority. N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9 to -10. However, seniority accrues by category, and “[a ...
docket: a5455-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-09-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18019
 Page:1 2 Previous 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!