Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 BONITA M. LERRO v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES -- rank: 618

... g) provides in pertinent part as follows: In accordance with N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, past-due child support payments are a judgment by operation ...

docket:	a0910-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43410

32 RONALD T. VILLONE, JR. v. KATHERINE VILLONE -- rank: 618

... support retroactive to the beginning of 2005. We begin with N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. On its face, this statute appears to prohibit retroactive increases ... motion was mailed either directly or through the appropriate agent. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a.] In Keegan v. Keegan , 326 N.J. Super. 289 , 294 ... We concluded that, "[n]othing in the legislative history [of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a] suggests that the law was enacted to protect parents from ...

docket:	a6292-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-10-31
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	53321

33 DENISE L. EVANS v. JEFFREY E. STEFFENS -- rank: 614

... equivalent of a retroactive modification of child support prohibited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. We disagree and affirm that portion of the order. The ... amounted to a retroactive modification of child support prohibited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The PSA did not require defendant to pay child support ... is not a retroactive modification of child support prohibited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a because the support obligation is terminated as of the date ...

docket:	A0798-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48066

34 JONATHAN CUSHMAN v. VICKI LOSASSO -- rank: 610

... child support for purposes of applying the prohibition contained in N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a against retroactive reduction of child support. The Family Part judge ... 8, 2008, the date that Cushman's motion was filed. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a states in relevant part: No payment or installment of an ... determination of the child's emancipation despite the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Mahoney v. Pennell , supra , 285 N.J. Super. at 643 ...

docket:	a0692-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26789

35 ANOUSH KACHERIAN v. ARSHAK EDWARD MIRZOYAN -- rank: 606

... the children, citing the statutory prohibition against retroactive child support. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Kacherian filed a pro se motion for reconsideration dated April ... court's decision that retroactive child support was statutorily barred, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Nor does she address the court's decision that it ...

docket:	a5034-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41543

36 MARTHA RUGGERO v. MICHAEL RUGGERO -- rank: 606

... judge explained that defendant's retroactive application was prohibited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a and that defendant failed to meet his burden under Lepis ... his situation warrants an exception to the retroactive bar of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. He further seeks a remand to credit the derivative social ... persuaded by defendant's arguments on the retroactive application of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. In Golian v. Golian , 344 N.J. Super. 337 (App ...

docket:	A1694-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-05-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29130

37 CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES ON BEHALF OF CATHERINE WRIGHT v. RICARDO DEJESUS -- rank: 594

... support judgment was docketed against defendant Ricardo DeJesus pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The issue on appeal is how much of the proceeds ...

docket:	a4592-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-01-09
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31031

38 M.R v. D.H -- rank: 586

... limitations law generally applicable to all judgments. To the contrary, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a expressly states that child support judgments, 'once docketed with the ...

docket:	a1552-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13105

39 PEARL SEIDEN v. JAMES M. NEWMAN -- rank: 582

... proscription against retroactive modification of child support orders contained in N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a is inapplicable. Additionally, we note that the COLA notices sent ...

docket:	a5141-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-12-08
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	91490

40 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/tax/a5538-13a1020-14a4572-14a5442-14.opn.html -- rank: 578

... Court Erred in Making Defendant's Relief Retroactive Contrary to [ N.J.S.A. ] 2A:17-56.23a. V. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN RESTRAINING THE PLAINTIFF FROM ... in child support. That he did so did not violate N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The statute allows for retroactive reduction "with respect to the ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	67917

41 JOSEPHINE PENZA v. ROBERT PENZA -- rank: 578

... Court Erred in Making Defendant's Relief Retroactive Contrary to [ N.J.S.A. ] 2A:17-56.23a. V. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN RESTRAINING THE PLAINTIFF FROM ... in child support. That he did so did not violate N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The statute allows for retroactive reduction "with respect to the ...

docket:	a5538-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	68861

42 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/trial/trial-court-squibs21-22.opn.html -- rank: 570

... of the adoption, as opposed to the date of application. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a generally prohibits retroactive modifications of child support prior to the ... thereby extinguishing any duty of support, the court holds that N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a does not bar termination or modification of child support retroactive ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25176

43 CHARLES CANNIZZARO v. BARBARA CANNIZZARO -- rank: 562

... Warren County Probation Department. We agree. As a general matter, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a prohibits the retroactive reduction of court-ordered child support. The ... 12 (Ch. Div. 1989). The motion judge properly recognized that N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a does not preclude a reduction of child support retroactive to ...

docket:	a1595-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-03-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19588

44 LINDA BRIGHT v. JAMES BRIGHT -- rank: 558

... this court to impose a rule of law akin to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, the statutory provision that limits the court's authority to ... absence of a motion for modification, was not prohibited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Mallamo , supra , 280 N.J. Super. at 16-17. There ...

docket:	a5714-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-07-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60868

45 SUSAN A. CAREY v. JOSEPH CAREY -- rank: 558

... arrearage of $17,841. Defendant first asserts that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a , his child support obligation cannot be retroactively increased. However, in ...

docket:	a6246-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-03-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	39880