Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 DIANE SCHMIDT v. PAUL A. BREDA -- rank: 554

... modification of a child support order is not permitted by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, except for the time in which a motion for such ... Pascale v. Pascale , 140 N.J. 583 , 591 (1995). Moreover, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a precludes retroactive modifications of child support orders, except for the ...

docket:	a2892-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22344

47 EVETT SHULMAN v. STUART WEINER -- rank: 554

... period during which there is a pending application for modification." N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The statute seems to bar any retroactive modification of child ... We reasoned that "[n]othing in the legislative history [of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a] suggests that the law was enacted to protect parents from ...

docket:	a1892-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61109

48 AMY SCOTT v. GREGORY SCOTT -- rank: 550

... worksheet to claculate defendant's current child support obligation. Citing N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, the court declined to modify defendant's child support obligation ... e)(1)(E). However, we make the following brief comments. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides a limitation on the extent to which a judge ...

docket:	a3880-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22069

49 JAMES JOSEPH MCGINLEY v. PATRICIA N. MCGINLEY -- rank: 550

... motion was mailed either directly or through the appropriate agent. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a.] Defendant's avers that the de facto change in custody ... been filed at any time after March 10, 2008; under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, defendant bears the burden of her failure to do so ...

docket:	a4136-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29135

50 STEPHEN J. LLEWELLYN v. IRIS LLEWELLYN -- rank: 550

... v. Reldan , 100 N.J. 187 , 205 (1985). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, no child support order shall be retroactively modified by a ... Lauren. That triggering event predated the initial request which, under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, could serve as the retroactive effective date. We agree with ...

docket:	a4063-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-11-28
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	51376

51 VIRGINIA GORDON v. ARTHUR J. GORDON -- rank: 550

... 295 N.J. Super. 498, 514 (App. Div. 1996). Although N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides that the retroactivity of child support modification is limited ... at 513-14. We found the child support date violated N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, but the retroactivity date for the alimony decision was purely ...

docket:	a2858-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33532

52 STEPHANIE MESSNER v. MIKLOS HAJDU-NEMETH -- rank: 550

... the day the children began living with him. Plaintiff cites N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a which states: A-5607-16T1 10 No payment or installment ... to the effective date of P.L.1993, c.45 ([ N.J.S.A.] 2A:17- 56.23a), shall be retroactively modified by the court except with respect ...

docket:	a5607-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27274

53 PATRICIA KIELY v. FRANCIS KIELY -- rank: 550

... constitute a retroactive modification of child support in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. 4 See J.S. v. L.S. , 389 N.J ... all other purposes be deemed to be an adult"). 4 N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides in pertinent part: No payment or installment of an ...

docket:	a0738-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35773

54 LA MECIA ROSS v. MAURICE TIGGETT -- rank: 546

... children, the judge explained 2 that the Anti-Retroactivity Statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, was applicable. The judge pointed out that plaintiff 'had an ... Pertinent to the matter under review, the relevant portion of N.J.S.A. 2A:17- 56.23a states: No payment or installment of an order for child ...

docket:	a0263-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24638

55 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1846-20.opn.html -- rank: 542

... the January 24, 2019 order and judgment is statutorily barred. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, the anti- retroactive support statute, prohibits the retroactive vacation or ... s motion to vacate the order was in contravention of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. From July 2014 through December 2019, Mostun's child support ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	27533

56 MARYANN BRADFORD v. THOMAS A. DUFFY -- rank: 538

... that this was an abuse of discretion. He relies upon N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, which provides that "[n]o payment or installment of an ... revise such orders as circumstances may require.") Moreover, nothing in N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a forbids the result reached here. The statute requires that child ...

docket:	a2927-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59239

57 PAMELA ANN ABRAMS f/k/a Lombardo v. DOMINIC LOMBARDO -- rank: 534

... less analyzed, any of them. While it is true that N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a was enacted to insure that on-going support obligations that ... Anthony did not graduate from high school until June 2004. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides in pertinent part that "[n]o payment or installment ...

docket:	a2673-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-10-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43836

58 AIESHA S. ROBINSON v. ERIC L. LEONARD -- rank: 530

... for retroactive modification of his support order is prohibited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, which states in pertinent part: No payment or installment of ...

docket:	a1463-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18242

59 PATRICIA WOMER v. JACK P. POLING -- rank: 522

... Super. 259 , 262 (App. Div. 1968), superseded on other grounds , N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, as recognized in , Mallamo v. Mallamo , 280 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a4502-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55903

60 PAMELA S. SPINELLI THORNTON v. SCOTT D. ROSKAM -- rank: 518

... the parties to recalculate 'if appropriate' without any timeline. Citing N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a,3 the court determined any recalculation of child support would ... circumstances and denied his motion to recalculate child support. 3 N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides in pertinent part: No payment or installment of an ...

docket:	a1791-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34068