Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 MARC Z. EDELL v. PAULA N. EDELL -- rank: 688

... factors. Rothman v. Rothman , 65 N.J. 219 , 232 (1974); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. See Painter v. Painter , 65 N.J. 196 , 212 (1974 ...

docket:	a5953-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-11-28
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	209589

62 D.P.G v. L.G. -- rank: 685

... the equitable distribution arrangement, the judge cited the factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and made explicit findings for each factor. The judge noted ...

docket:	a1750-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-09-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51787

63 NANSI GIRGIS v. RAGAEY GIRGIS -- rank: 685

... asset for abuse of discretion. Equitable distribution is governed by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. This statute authorizes a judge to determine not only which ... but is not limited to, the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. A-4816-17T3 4 Applying the statutory factors to the ...

docket:	a4816-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23771

64 GREGORY C. LUND v. CAROLINE LUND -- rank: 682

... the marital assets, the judge considered the applicable factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1: the parties' twenty-six years of marriage; their ages and ... v. Petersen, 85 N.J. 638, 643 n. 2 (1981)). N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 requires a court to consider the following factors when dividing ... on the judge's application of the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, and consideration of defendant's nonpecuniary contributions to the household ...

docket:	a2943-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-02-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36713

65 MARY L. DIEMER v. ROY R. DIEMER -- rank: 682

... of the Georgia timeshares the couple owned during the marriage. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(i) (emphasis added) requires a court to consider the "contribution ...

docket:	a5249-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	70569

66 W.T. v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES -- rank: 680

... Here the matrimonial statute clearly speaks to the issue presented. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Moreover, petitioner relied upon and followed the matrimonial statute. If ... to arrive at the allocation of assets is embodied in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. There is no comparable Medicaid-equitable distribution regulation that holds ... transfer without fair value. The [DMAHS] policy directly conflicts with N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Furthermore, there were no reliable or quantitative proofs offered by ... distribution, and an application of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, the PSA executed by the parties cannot be held unconscionable ...

docket:	A0089-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-01
status:	published
citation:	391 N.J. Super. 25 916 A.2d 1066
Document Size:	96712

67 LINDA BRIGHT v. JAMES BRIGHT -- rank: 674

... reflected a consideration of the applicable criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. In particular, the court reviewed "[t]he contribution of each ... evidence in the record and consistent with the factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. See Rothman v. Rothman , 65 N.J. 219 , 232 (1974 ...

docket:	a5714-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-07-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60868

68 AMIRA EL-GOGHEL v. AMR SHEBITA -- rank: 674

... to asset eligibility or ineligibility, asset valuation, and equitable distribution . . . ." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. A court should apply all the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and distribute marital assets consistent with the parties' unique needs ...

docket:	a2319-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-02
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	72908

69 EDWIN BICE v. TAMMY BICE -- rank: 672

... TO MAKE MEANINGFUL FACTUAL FINDINGS AND/OR AS REQUIRED UNDER N.J.S.[A.] 2A:34-23.1(a)-(p) EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION CRITERIA THEREBY COMMITTING REVERSIBLE ERROR. POINT ... not limited to, the factors set forth in this section." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The alimony statute requires the same. "In any case in ... p. Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1.] The court here simply failed to address and consider all ... 23(b)(10) (equitable distribution factor in determining alimony) with N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 (factors for determining equitable distribution). 7 On appeal, plaintiff argues ...

docket:	a5908-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51403

70 SUSAN BARBIERI BERGER v. MARK J. BERGER -- rank: 672

... to asset eligibility or ineligibility, asset valuation, and equitable distribution . . . ." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. A court should apply all the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, and distribute marital assets consistent with the parties' unique needs ...

docket:	a4009-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45999

71 DEBRA AMIR v. YEHUDA A. AMIR -- rank: 669

... p. Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1] The statute further creates "a rebuttable presumption that each party ... recognized as a legitimate issue for the court to consider, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(j), the defendant's claim here is hypothetical at best ...

docket:	a0098-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62856

72 ELLEN HALL MARTIGNETTI v. CHRISTOPHER MARTIGNETTI -- rank: 669

... value of the property and consider the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 in reaching an equitable distribution decision. Rothman , supra , 65 N.J. at 232; see also N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 (requiring "specific findings of fact on the evidence relevant to ...

docket:	a2306-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	87245

73 DEBRA AMIR v. YEHUDA A. AMIR -- rank: 669

... p. Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1] The statute further creates "a rebuttable presumption that each party ... recognized as a legitimate issue for the court to consider, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(j), the defendant's claim here is hypothetical at best ...

docket:	a1802-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62840

74 SONGUL CETIN v. ISMAIL CETIN -- rank: 669

... to his income and expense discrepancies. Considering the factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, Judge Middlesworth allocated defendant the entire sum of $100,000 ...

docket:	A2680-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-01-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63516

75 DEBRA AMIR v. YEHUDA A. AMIR -- rank: 669

... p. Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1] The statute further creates "a rebuttable presumption that each party ... recognized as a legitimate issue for the court to consider, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(j), the defendant's claim here is hypothetical at best ...

docket:	a4662-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-19
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	61741