Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 CONSTANCE EBERHARDT v. ROBERT EBERHARDT -- rank: 429

... accordance with N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 and N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25." He further argues that "a logical reading of the [PSA ...

docket:	a0281-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-09-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41457

32 Fereshteh Fazilat v. Nathan Feldstein -- rank: 425

... v. Kiken , 149 N.J. 441 , 453 (1997). Relying on N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25, which expressly terminates the duty to pay alimony on the ...

docket:	a-49-03
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2004-05-27
status:
citation:	180 N.J. 74
Document Size:	52512

33 EDWARD MISLAVSKY v. DONNA MISLAVSKY -- rank: 425

... minority. Grotsky , supra , 58 N.J. at 361. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25, alimony terminates upon the death of the payer spouse. However ...

docket:	a6570-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-08-14
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	61624

34 DALE EAGAN CLAFFEY v. DANIEL CLAFFEY, -- rank: 422

... asset. We need not reach the interesting issue of whether N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25 provides that alimony terminates upon the death of payer spouse ...

docket:	a6632-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2003-05-19
status:	published
citation:	360 N.J. Super. 240
Document Size:	54049

35 PATRICIA WOMER v. JACK P. POLING -- rank: 419

... spouse" in the event of the payor spouse's death. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25. The purpose is to assure a sufficient fund for the ...

docket:	a4502-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55903

36 JERRY VOTTA v. ROSEMARIE VOTTA -- rank: 394

... authorized to impose such a requirement upon the supporting party. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25. "However, each case must stand on [its] own facts and ...

docket:	A1527-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-07-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55937

37 HARVEY N. KAREN v. LINDA KAREN -- rank: 391

... award of alimony continues to be "fit, reasonable and just," N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25 , the court must consider the characteristics of the new relationship ...

docket:	a3038-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-08-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31567

38 BRUCE LEFKON v. FRANCES LEFKON -- rank: 372

... plaintiff's death would terminate alimony payments to the defendant. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25. Upon his retirement, he is legally entitled to petition the ...

docket:	a5951-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-01-17
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	59200

39 ALICE MURPHY VS. JOHN JAMES MURPHY -- rank: 365

... in the event of the payor spouse's death.'" See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25.     Here, defendant claimed that he was unable to obtain life ...

docket:	a4828-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-07-06
status:	published
citation:	313 N.J.Super. 575
Document Size:	19240

40 CINDY B. VERGA v. GARY VERGA -- rank: 362

... J. Super. 240 , 250, 263 (App. Div. 2003) (equitable distribution); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25. However, the termination of alimony capped defendant's total obligation ...

docket:	a3481-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26403

41 ELIZABETH M. STARR v. JOSEPH J. STARR 2011 - -- rank: 340

... spouse" in the event of the payor spouse's death. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25. The purpose of life insurance is to assure a sufficient ...

docket:	a4466-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12781

42 KENNETH SCHAEFER v. THERESA KAMERY -- rank: 315

... The judge also considered and rejected defendant’s contention that N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25, “Termination of alimony,” mandates termination of her alimony ...

docket:	a1032-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17649

43 BILLINGSWHEELER, IV v. ANNA WHEELER -- rank: 293

... terminated thereafter pursuant to the parties' own agreement. See also N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25. Now remarried, defendant does not allege she is dependent on ...

docket:	a4383-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15293