Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 M.W v. M.B.W -- rank: 565

... V. SILVER ANALYSIS BY NOT CONSIDERING ALL THE FACTORS OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) THROUGH (6) AND BY CONSIDERING EVIDENCE NOT IN ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- - 29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... danger or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401.] Here ...

docket:	a1105-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20652

137 D.M.R. v. M.K.G., -- rank: 565

... necessary, the judge must evaluate the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6) and, applying those factors ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. 1995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Here, the judge found an FRO was necessary to ...

docket:	a4085-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-11
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	37070

138 M.H. v. V.H. -- rank: 562

... must consider the protection of "the victim and any child." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). The judge determined an FRO was necessary under Silver ... violence between the parties and the existence of immediate danger. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Peranio , supra , 280 N.J. Super. at ...

docket:	a4346-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19300

139 N.I v. L.M -- rank: 562

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to - 29[(a)](6), to protect the A ... and 'the best interests of the victim and any child.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2) and (3). Under N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a3516-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-08-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16863

140 L.M.J v. D.V.O -- rank: 560

... N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) (instructing courts to consider the parties' previous history ... an evaluation of the fact[or]s set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. l995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402. Harassment ...

docket:	a2876-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27716

141 C.R.D. v. C.S -- rank: 560

... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). If the court finds the defendant committed a predicate ... is necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors included in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), to protect the victim from an ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2), and (4). A-0826-20 11 In ... terse analysis was any reference to the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Indeed, the judge made no findings concerning the parties' previous history of domestic violence, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), notwithstanding plaintiff's allegation that defendant assaulted him ...

docket:	a0826-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23654

142 M.D.G. v. J.G. -- rank: 560

... whether there exists immediate danger to person or property. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2). . . . . The second inquiry, upon a finding ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... or to prevent further abuse." Id. at 127; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). Here, the judge acknowledged that his determination of the ... required protection from "immediate danger or to prevent further abuse." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). We exercise broad review in considering "the trial judge ...

docket:	a4940-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-09-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30355

143 T.M.S. v. W.C.P. -- rank: 560

... 29, 2006. Defendant moved to vacate the FRO pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) and Carfagno v. Carfagno , 288 N.J. Super. 424 ... a court may vacate an FRO upon good cause shown. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). Carfagno establishes eleven factors a court must weigh to ... defendant makes a request to dismiss an FRO pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), the manual provides "[t]he court shall make reasonable ... adjudicated within ten days of filing of the complaint . See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Rather, we rely on N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) which provides: Upon good cause shown, any final order ...

docket:	a4900-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-05
status:	published
citation:	450 N.J.Super. 499 163 A.3d 929
Document Size:	38727

144 M.L. VS. K.B. -- rank: 560

... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Terroristic threats are among the predicate acts that constitute ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... N.J. Super. at 127. A-2751-22 10 Under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), [t]he court shall consider but not be limited ... the parties' full prior history in analyzing the case. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) (requiring the court A-2751-22 13 to ...

docket:	a2751-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26987

145 J.D v. C.C -- rank: 557

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... Although the court should assess the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to determine if the ... not limit the court's consideration to those factors. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (listing the factors a 'court shall consider but not ...

docket:	a5713-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-09-30
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18948

146 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5404-16.opn.html -- rank: 557

... M.D.F., 207 N.J. 458, 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). Thus, after the trial judge determines a predicate act ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- - 29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... Silver prong requires consideration of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -(6): (1) The previous history of domestic ... contact and almost inevitably be a source of conflict. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 (a) (4) and (5). In this regard, we note that ... of terroristic threats and two separate acts of harassment, see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 (a) (1), that may likely be repeated in the A ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20402

147 A.M., v. E.M -- rank: 557

... 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Here, plaintiff alleged that defendant engaged in harassment ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the [factors] set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] A-3482-21 11 Although the court is not ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. 1995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1)-(2)). The court must exercise care 'to distinguish ...

docket:	a3482-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26939

148 C.G. v. B.C.M. -- rank: 555

... 25-19[(a)] has occurred.' Id. at 125; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (providing that an FRO may only be granted 'after ... finding that 'relief [is] necessary to prevent further abuse' (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b))). As part of that second step, the judge must ... an evaluation of the fact[or]s set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... did not evaluate any of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). See id. at 475-76. The ...

docket:	a0656-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27192

149 J.T. VS. A.S.A., ET AL. -- rank: 555

... the domestic violence complaint by a preponderance of the evidence. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Among the factors to be considered under the PDVA ... the plaintiff and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). When a Family Part judge considers whether the ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- - 29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ...

docket:	a1860-22a2152-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-03-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37969

150 Z.A.S.C v. A.C.C -- rank: 555

... 25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (providing that an FRO may only be granted 'after ... finding that relief is 'necessary to prevent further abuse' (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b))). 1. Terroristic Threats. A person is guilty of terroristic ...

docket:	a0810-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20239