Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL RECORD OF ROBERT RUSSO -- rank: 439

... charge of possession of less than fifty grams of marijuana, N.J.S.A. 2C:52-32. For that reason, repetitive offenders are barred from relief under ...

docket:	a5575-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-07-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22324

47 IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL RECORD OF J.G.B -- rank: 434

... context of expungement. Contrary to J.G.B.'s claim, N.J.S.A. 2C:52-32, which directs courts to construe the expungement statutes in light ...

docket:	a4807-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-03-23
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24397

48 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS KING, -- rank: 417

... if he or she has more than one indictable conviction. N.J.S.A. 2C:52-32. Our holding today is consistent with the legislative goal. We ...

docket:	a4100-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-05-15
status:	published
citation:	340 N.J. Super. 390
Document Size:	15333

49 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF J.J.A. -- rank: 337

... a life of rectitude and disassociated himself with unlawful activity. . . ." N.J.S.A. 2C:52-32. That objective would not be served by permitting expungement of ...

docket:	a6030-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-02-06
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	24574

50 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SEYMOUR O. JOHNSON FOR EXPUNGEMENT -- rank: 328

... possible for his June 12, 1992 conviction for sexual assault, N.J.S.A. 2C:52-32. If we could stop our analysis there, he would be ...

docket:	a4689-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10425

51 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH SNYDER -- rank: 311

... purpose of our expungement of records statute is provided in N.J.S.A. 2C:52-32, which states: This chapter shall be construed with the primary ...

docket:	A3238-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17320