Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2a:162-22")   16 to 26 of 26 results. Run time: 0.659 seconds | Search time: 0.652 seconds    
 Page:1 2 Previous 15
16 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/squibs17-18.opn.html -- rank: 604
... 26, the State generally has ninety days to indict defendant, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(1)(a), and 180 days after the indictment to try defendant, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a). Both periods allow for 'excludable time' and ... continue detaining defendant provided the State can make certain showings. N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(1), (2). In accordance with the CJRA, defendant has ... found a total of sixty-seven days of 'excludable time,' N.J.S.A. 2A:162- 22(a), under the CJRA. We hold that our standard of ... in which a case shall be indicted or tried' under N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b) is de novo. We also hold that we apply ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 30586
17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTOINE WILLIAMS -- rank: 604
... be detained before he or she is indicted and tried. N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22; see also R. 3:25-4. A defendant cannot be ... than 180 days after indictment and the start of trial. N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(1)(a), (2)(a). Both those time periods are ... delays' and the CJRA lists thirteen types of excludable time. N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b); see also R. 3:25-4(i). The CJRA ... a single indictment, not counting any delays attributable to defendant. N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a), (a)(2)(c). If trial has not ... to unreasonable delays by the prosecutor. A-2850-19T6 11 N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a). If trial has not commenced by the ... Ibid.; see also R. 3:25-4. Applicable here is N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a), which provides in relevant part: An ...
docket: a2850-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-07-07
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 34972
18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANDEL M. GRIMSLEY -- rank: 594
... court later granted defendants' motions for pretrial release pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a) because two years had passed since the ...
docket: a2699-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-09-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22906
19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANDRE THOMPSON -- rank: 574
... rule and statute. See R. 3:25-4(i)(12); N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(l). The defense responded by referring to the prosecution ... citing Rule 3:25-4(i) (last paragraph). See also N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(2). The judge reserved decision. Three orders and a ... subparagraph (i)(13) of Rule 3:25-4. See also N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(2). A-1909-19T6 11 share of the time ...
docket: a1909-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-02-04
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22977
20 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2163-18.opn.html -- rank: 567
... law, a prosecuting attorney's unavailability may represent 'good cause,' N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(1)(l); R. 3:25-4(i)(12), to ... for reasonable delays . . . prior to the return of an indictment.' N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(1)(a). On June 26, 2018, before the ninety ... not counting excludable time – 'before commencement of the trial.' N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a). Defendant was thus entitled, after inclusion of ... on the Act's general 'good cause' catchall provision. See N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(1)(l) (recognizing the authority to grant excludable time ... the authority to grant excludable time in words identical to N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(1)(l) except that the rule also declares 'that ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 26179
21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARKEITH BRYSON -- rank: 544
... a scheduled release date of January 6, 2018, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22. On August 18, 2017, defendant demanded discovery of audiovisual tapes ... testimony, the trial court abused its discretion. Finally, we note N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22, the speedy trial section of the Criminal Justice Reform Act ... and, in response, the State may request excludable time under N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(1)(g). 'Thus, the speedy trial statute was not ...
docket: a2263-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-07-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36851
22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CALIER SAMAD -- rank: 465
... new law, there was no immediate risk of dismissal. See N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a). And the deadline could be extended if ... F.W., 468 N.J. Super. at 433-34 (quoting N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a)). If the court did prioritize new cases ...
docket: a2904-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-12-03
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 65467
23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTOINE WILLIAMS -- rank: 462
... period of time 'not counting excludable time for reasonable delays.' N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a). What constitutes excludable time is circumscribed by N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b) and Rule 3:25-4. We granted defendant's ... motion commences when the motion is 'fil[ed],' as both N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(1)(c) and Rule 3:25-4(i)(3 ... law on this subject, but that may only be because N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b)(1)(c) and Rule 3:25- 4(i)(3 ...
docket: a5648-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-12-02
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 13424
24 State v. Laurie Wint -- rank: 398
... reasonable delays . . . , prior to the return of an indictment.” N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(1)(a). As such, extended pre-indictment 35 detainment ...
docket: a-28-29-17
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2018-12-12
status:
citation:
Document Size: 81072
25 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BASILIS STEPHANATOS -- rank: 368
... the considerations set forth in the Criminal Justice Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a). 19 A-3443-18 sufficient condition to ...
docket: a3443-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-02-23
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 50805
26 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEFFREY HULSE -- rank: 298
... Hulse were approaching the two-year maximum release date under N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a)(2)(a). Prior to that date, we were never ...
docket: a3923-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-03-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36493
 Page:1 2 Previous 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!