Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

121 R.P.B. v. D.R. -- rank: 572

... if the court determines "by a preponderance of the evidence[,]" N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), that the defendant has committed an act of domestic ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. [2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6)], to protect the victim ... held "within [ten] days of the filing of [the] complaint[,]" N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), and no new allegations were made at the final ...

docket:	a2604-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45186

122 S.A.P. v. J.L. -- rank: 572

... that a FRO was necessary to prevent further abuse, see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b), we affirm. In her complaint seeking a temporary restraining ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to 29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) ('In proceedings in which complaints for restraining orders have ...

docket:	a3495-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-05-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25196

123 R.M.M v. E.S.M -- rank: 570

... Div. 2006). A-0441-21 12 the factors listed [under] N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).' Defendant urges us to vacate the FRO and remand ... continuing restraints and neglecting to consider the factors outlined under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). It is well established '[c]ommission of a predicate ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6),8 to protect the 8 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 provides in part: The court shall consider but not be ... and that he implicitly addressed the applicable statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a) before granting the FRO. For example, he considered plaintiff ...

docket:	a0441-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35242

124 S.R.L., SR v. B.A.S -- rank: 570

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -(6),[5] to protect the 5 The ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6).] 6 Bella's brief also includes ... under the second prong is, after considering the statutory factors, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), determining 'whether a domestic violence restraining ...

docket:	a0469-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34777

125 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0428-20.opn.html -- rank: 570

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to - 29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... danger or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401.] T ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25128

126 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PHILIP A. SAPIO -- rank: 567

... he is aware of a high probability of their existence." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) sets forth the relief that may be included in a final restraining order. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(6) specifically provides that a court may order that ... any specificity that defendant was barred from the Walmart store. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(6). The fact C.S. may have had to ... and they are specifically identified in a domestic violence order. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(6). Accordingly, because the FRO did not prohibit defendant ...

docket:	a0674-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19638

127 C.S. v. M.A.K. -- rank: 567

... Kunen , 313 N.J. Super. 600 , 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). If a predicate offense is proven, the judge ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 281 N.J. Super. 243 , 248 (App. Div. 1995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)); see also Cesare , supra , 154 N.J. at 402 ...

docket:	a4097-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-09-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16871

128 T.M. v. R.M.W. -- rank: 567

... M.D.F., 207 N.J. 458, 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). Factors to be considered include: (1) [t]he previous ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child. . . . [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) permits the introduction of evidence of the 'previous history ... Kunen, 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Here, plaintiff alleges defendant committed the predicate acts ...

docket:	fv-15-0506-18
court:
decided:	2017-09-28
status:
citation:	456 N.J.Super. 446 195 A.3d 152
Document Size:	40125

129 L.S. v. J.P. -- rank: 567

... Kunen , 313 N.J. Super. 600 , 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). If a predicate offense is proven, the judge ... 281 N.J. Super. 243 , 248 (App. Div. l995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)); see also Cesare , supra , 154 N.J. at 402 ...

docket:	a2149-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26762

130 T.D. v. M.A -- rank: 567

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), to protect the victim from an ... further abuse.' Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... the plaintiff and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). In the present matter, defendant challenges the trial ... s harassing communications. Without expressly referencing the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a), the judge nonetheless determined plaintiff established a prior domestic violence history between the parties. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401 ...

docket:	a1355-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28039

131 M.G v. M.G -- rank: 567

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29, [ 3 ] to protect the victim from an immediate danger or ... supra , 207 N.J. at 479-80, 483; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). In determining whether harassment has been established, the ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] 4 We also find defendant's argument that plaintiff ...

docket:	a2648-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26034

132 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1358-19.opn.html -- rank: 565

... and (2) failed to evaluate all of the factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) in determining whether an FRO was necessary to prevent ... the factors relevant to the issuance of an FRO in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), as required by Silver v. Silver ... did not explicitly review all six factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). However, based on the evidence presented ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2), (4), and (6). The record shows the ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	31216

133 L.M v. L.J.L -- rank: 565

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... violence between the [parties], including threats, harassment and physical abuse,' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), and '[t]he best interests of the victim[,]' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(4). Governed by these principles, we address defendant's ...

docket:	a0477-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-04-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26925

134 D.M.R. v. M.K.G., -- rank: 565

... necessary, the judge must evaluate the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6) and, applying those factors ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. 1995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Here, the judge found an FRO was necessary to ...

docket:	a4085-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-11
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	37070

135 C.H v. R.J.O -- rank: 565

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 1973). Nonetheless, we add the following brief remarks. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4), a judge may issue '[a]n order requiring ... of attorneys' fees was not an abuse of discretion. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4); McGowan, 391 N.J. Super. at 508. Affirmed ...

docket:	a1058-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24721