Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2c:25-29")   181 to 195 of 604 results. Run time: 0.916 seconds | Search time: 0.909 seconds    
 Page:1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 41 Previous 15 Next 15
181 RONNIE CHARME v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 537
... a court to impose restraints, including a restraining order. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). Although the restraints imposed pursuant to the [PDVA] are ...
docket: a2265-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-08-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26562
182 M.A.T. v. V.A.M. -- rank: 537
... M.D.F. , 207 N.J. 458 , 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). In this regard, it is well-established that commission ... present." Corrente , supra , 281 N.J. Super. at 248 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2)). Although this determination "is most often ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ...
docket: a4190-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-05-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29596
183 M.H. v. J.F.H. -- rank: 537
... FRO. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-19(a)(13); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(1), (6)-(7). The offense of harassment at issue ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Although the court is not required to incorporate all ...
docket: a2329-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-07-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20014
184 ADANNA BANKS v. TUNKO SERAZI -- rank: 537
... N.J.S.A. 2C:25-28(a)). Thus, under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(2), a Family Part judge can issue an order ... in the residence previously shared by the parties. Also, under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(8), a judge can issue an order requiring the ...
docket: a0007-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-10-12
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31278
185 N.J v. J.J -- rank: 535
... forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-19(a); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), which also may be illuminated by a prior history ... based upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), to protect Nora from immediate danger ...
docket: a1920-14
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-05-05
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 48484
186 K.P. v. S.V.P. -- rank: 535
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... from an immediate danger or to prevent further abuse. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) (stating that '[i]n proceedings in which complaints for ... and defendant; [and] .... 4) The best interests of the victim . . . . [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Based on the record, we are satisfied the judge ...
docket: a5164-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-04-29
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 19405
187 M.J.T v. C.J.T. -- rank: 532
... standard' requires 'an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6).' Ibid. In A.M ... violence, which included both physical violence and threats of violence, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); (2) plaintiff's decision to leave the A ... 8 marital residence . . . which established 'the existence of immediate danger,' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(2); and (3) the fact that, under these circumstances ... of [an FRO] is indisputably in plaintiff's best interests, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(4). [Ibid.] Here, the trial judge made specific findings ...
docket: a1175-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-10-12
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17367
188 J.L.H. v. C.J.F. -- rank: 532
... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Next, the court must determine whether a restraining order ... further abuse.'' J.D., 207 N.J. at 476 (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). Here, the judge concluded defendant committed simple assault. A ... the trial court to evaluate the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to –(6) to determine whether [an FRO ... further abuse.' Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). Consequently, we are constrained to vacate the FRO, reinstate ...
docket: a3405-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-06-04
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23958
189 J.E.S v. A.S., JR -- rank: 532
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 76 (citation omitted). Two of the criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) are "[t]he previous history of domestic violence between ... t]he existence of immediate danger to person or property." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2). Defendant argues that plaintiff sought a restraining ...
docket: a1103-14
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-11-11
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 38141
190 E.S. v. J.Y.S -- rank: 532
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(]a[)](1) to -29[(]a[)](6), to protect the victim ... or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) ('In proceedings in which complaints for restraining orders have ...
docket: a3149-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-04-07
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27572
191 O.S.N v. C.M.N -- rank: 532
... to dissolve or modify a FRO upon good cause shown. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d); Carfagno, 288 N.J. Super. at 434. Defendant initially ... proof for obtaining a FRO is preponderance of the evidence. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). The court correctly determined it was not bound by ...
docket: a4605-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-09-22
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23238
192 M.N. v. H.N. -- rank: 532
... Kunen, 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). 'A defendant's prior abusive acts should be ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. 1995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)); Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402. Applying these standards ...
docket: a5443-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-12-06
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20884
193 L.H. v. D.T.H. -- rank: 532
... 112 (App. Div. 2006), the judge considered the factors under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 and concluded as follows: A-2910-21 12 I have ... violence and did not require the protection of an FRO. N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a) contains six factors a court must consider in deciding whether an FRO should enter. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) requires consideration of '[t]he previous history of ... and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse;' and under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(2) a court considers '[t]he existence of immediate ...
docket: a2910-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-05-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29423
194 K.B v. L.W -- rank: 532
... modify an FRO upon a showing of 'good cause shown . . . .' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). In determining if the applicant has shown good cause ... the hearing or hearings on which the order was based. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) (emphasis added).] Neither party disputes that the judge who ... judge did not have a 'complete record' for purposes of N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) because defendant did not testify at the FRO trial ...
docket: a1937-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-03-16
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31720
195 N.M. v. V.N. -- rank: 532
... FRO. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-19(a)(13); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(1), (6)-(7). The offense of harassment at issue ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Although the court is not required to incorporate all ...
docket: a3788-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-07-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 24519
 Page:1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 41 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!