Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

196 C.C. v. J.A.H. -- rank: 530

... 29(a),7 but the judge was 'not 7 Under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), trial judges 'shall consider' but are not limited by ... to protect plaintiff from immediate danger or future abuse. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b); Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127. To the ...

docket:	a4425-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-04
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	36345

197 Inthe Matter of the Application of the State of New Jersey for the Forfeiture of Personal Weapons and Firearms Identification Card Belonging to F.M. -- rank: 530

... and physical abuse” when determining whether domestic violence has occurred. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). 2 This archive is a service of Rutgers ...

docket:	A-60-14
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2016-06-30
status:
citation:	225 N.J. 487 139 A.3d 67
Document Size:	124284

198 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0359-20.opn.html -- rank: 530

... 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). A finding of harassment requires proof that the ... an evaluation of the fact[or]s set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), to protect the victim from an ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Here, the judge properly considered plaintiff's testimony on ... domestic violence and addressed the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Based upon the substantial credible evidence in the record ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23061

199 D.S v. J.S -- rank: 530

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- - 29(a)(1) to -29a(6), to protect the victim from ... the existence of a restraining order in a different jurisdiction. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). The list is not exclusive, N ... Div. 2015), and the court may consider other relevant factors, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (stating the court 'shall . . . not be limited' to the ...

docket:	a5021-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-01-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45230

200 D.I v. S.B -- rank: 527

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- - 29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... danger or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401.] A ...

docket:	a0150-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-12-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17321

201 C.J.B v. M.J.B -- rank: 527

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to - 29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... Moreover, the judge appropriately considered the factors set forth under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1)-(6) before concluding a restraining order was necessary ...

docket:	a3761-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-09-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17020

202 N.S v. R.H -- rank: 527

... necessary by reference to the relevant factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). That statute provides that once a predicate act of ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Here, the trial court recited a long history of ... post-divorce, which constituted past "threats, harassment, and physical abuse[.]" N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). The trial court found these reports of inappropriate ... these determinations that sufficiently support the court's conclusion under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), that entry of a restraining order was necessary to ...

docket:	a4650-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36120

203 E.T v. J.B -- rank: 527

... Kunen, 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(1). If a predicate offense is proven, the judge ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. l995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402. We ...

docket:	a0873-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42661

204 A.N v. S.F -- rank: 527

... the relationship and to give context to otherwise ambiguous behavior. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); J.D. , supra , 207 N.J. at 479 ... acts of harassment in light of the parties' history. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); J.D. , supra , 207 N.J. at 479 ...

docket:	a1939-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18304

205 S.M v. J.M -- rank: 525

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(1) to (6), to protect the victim from an ... the existence of a restraining order in a different jurisdiction. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). The court may also look to other relevant factors not included in the statute. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) ('The court shall consider but not be limited to ...

docket:	a2190-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27486

206 K.L v. S.L -- rank: 525

... at 412-13. Relief from an FRO is governed by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), which requires a showing of good cause. In Kanaszka ... App. Div. 2017); Kanaszka, 313 N.J. Super. at 608; N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). In G.M., we explained the burden imposed on ... the hearing or hearings on which the order was based.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(d). The 'complete record' requirement includes a complete 11 A ...

docket:	a1037-17
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-24
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25488

207 R.H. VS. N.S., N.S. VS. R.H. -- rank: 525

... 2C:25-19[(a)] has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). A-2499-22 8 If the court finds the ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... protection from immediate danger or the prevention of further abuse. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Although the court is not required to incorporate all ...

docket:	a2499-22a2500-22_0
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34343

208 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4174-18.opn.html -- rank: 525

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to - 29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... further abuse.' Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401.] Having ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	32707

209 J.R.L. v. P.T.R -- rank: 525

... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Harassment and assault A-0364-22 12 are among ...

docket:	a0364-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-12-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24554

210 L.B. v. R.B. -- rank: 525

... 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). A finding of harassment requires proof that the ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6)], to protect the victim from an ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] A-0619-18T1 8 Although the court is not ... and made no evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). Absent an expressed holding, or other ...

docket:	a0619-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21270