Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2c:25-29")   391 to 405 of 608 results. Run time: 0.737 seconds | Search time: 0.731 seconds    
 Page:1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 41 Previous 15 Next 15
391 S.M.B v. M.F.B -- rank: 445
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ...
docket: a0731-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-11-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22664
392 J.C. v. J.M. -- rank: 442
... THE FILING OF THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 a, CAUSING UNDUE BURDEN FOR THE DEFENDANT AND, THEREFORE, THE ... DEFENDANT IN MORE THAN CASUAL TERMS, AGAINST THE SPIRIT OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 a (1), PLACING THE DEFENDANT AT A DISADVANTAGE IN BEHAVIORAL ... DISMISSED OR REHEARD. IV. THERE IS A POSSIBLE VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 d, WHEREAS THE ORIGINAL JUDGE, OR A JUDGE WHO HAD ...
docket: A1178-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-07-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 39870
393 L.B.I v. W.F.A.-Y. -- rank: 442
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ...
docket: a3579-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-08-12
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23526
394 M.J v. A.J -- rank: 442
... abuse.'" J.D. , supra , 207 N.J. at 476 (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); L.M.F. v. J.A.F., Jr. , 421 ... present." Corrente , supra , 281 N.J. Super. at 248 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2)); Peranio , supra , 280 N.J. Super ...
docket: a2095-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-11-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 19002
395 A.E.R. v. R.J.R -- rank: 442
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the [factors] set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] The court is not mandated to incorporate all factors ...
docket: a2634-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2024-01-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17065
396 B.P. v. R.P. -- rank: 440
... in liberty and freedom in order 'to prevent further abuse.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b).' Ibid. See also D.N. v. K.M., 216 ... 587, 593 (2014) (Albin, J., dissenting) (cataloging the consequences under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) resulting from entry of a domestic violence FRO). Thus ...
docket: a4122-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-05-09
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 14880
397 C.C. v. T.R. -- rank: 440
... plaintiff presently requires an FRO for his or her protection. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); Pazienza v. Camarata , 381 N.J. Super. 173 ...
docket: a3670-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-02-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 40713
398 V.W. v. R.M.B. -- rank: 440
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. [2C:25-29(a)(1) to -(6)], to protect the victim from an ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Here, the judge concluded defendant committed harassment, N.J ...
docket: a3165-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-08-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27875
399 C.C. v. T.W.C. -- rank: 440
... N.J. Super. 534 , 544 (App. Div. 2006). Affirmed. 1 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) provides that "the court shall consider, but not be ...
docket: a1759-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-05-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21478
400 L.D. v. P.F. -- rank: 437
... The relief entered by the trial judge was also appropriate. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(2) allowed the trial judge to give Laila exclusive ... whom an FRO has been entered to be fingerprinted. Finally, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4) allows for an award of "reasonable attorney's ...
docket: a4747-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-06-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 19527
401 S.R. v. M.D. -- rank: 437
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. [2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6)], to protect the victim ...
docket: a1587-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-10-19
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26300
402 K.M.R v. B.R. -- rank: 435
... the plaintiff and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402 ... correctly considered the parties' previous history of domestic violence under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Because only one predicate act is required to ...
docket: a1701-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-03-02
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26734
403 L.N. v. G.D. -- rank: 435
... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] It was incumbent upon the court to make essential ... essentially found that there was no immediate danger to plaintiff, N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(2), but the court did so without assessing the ... remaining factors, in particular the prior history of domestic violence, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Yet, '[e]vidence [of a prior history of ...
docket: a3558-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-12-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29332
404 J.H. v. G.H -- rank: 435
... fully . . . familiar with the whole history of the case.' See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) (providing the application should be heard by 'the same ... or modify an FRO upon a showing of 'good cause.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). 'Generally, a court may dissolve an injunction where there ...
docket: a2377-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-03-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28505
405 Y.V. v. L.A.M. -- rank: 435
... by an award of custody to the non-abusive parent," N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(11). Accordingly, the December 11, 2009 order is vacated ...
docket: a2157-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-06-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21866
 Page:1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 41 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!