Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

466 N.B v. M.C -- rank: 392

... us no basis to reject on this record, we affirm. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), the statute that permits a Family Part judge to ... considering an application to dissolve a final restraining order under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d): (1) whether the victim consented to lift the restraining ...

docket:	a1097-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-11-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19326

467 T.W. v. M.W. -- rank: 392

... the plaintiff and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse[.]" N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). In Cesare , supra , the Court held "trial courts ...

docket:	a0456-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42389

468 T.D. v. A.L -- rank: 392

... is necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors included in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ...

docket:	a3569-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24581

469 E.E v. J.M.E -- rank: 392

... final restraining order under the Protection Against Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29. Defendant's estranged wife obtained the order after the court ...

docket:	a3639-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41589

470 V.J.C. v. M.V. -- rank: 390

... because the judge had already adjourned the hearing several times; N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) requires that a final hearing be held "within [ten ... the hearing." We agree. As the trial judge correctly noted, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) states that a final hearing on a party's ...

docket:	a4587-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18325

471 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0667-14.opn.html -- rank: 390

... supra , 387 N.J. Super. at 126. The factors from N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) also guide this analysis. We conclude the trial ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26285

472 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2831-16.opn.html -- rank: 390

... further abuse.' Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26628

473 A.J.D. v. D.K.C. -- rank: 387

... for the protection provided by the entry of an FRO. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). Defendant cross-appealed, asserting that the trial judge's ...

docket:	a1942-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24939

474 B.R. v. J.A. -- rank: 387

... show good cause and change of circumstances as required by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) and did not meet the Carfagno 3 factors for ... of Am. , 65 N.J. 474 , 484 (1974). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d): Upon good cause shown, any final [restraining] order may ...

docket:	a1442-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24619

475 J.M.F. v. G.M.F. -- rank: 387

... considerations, the Legislature included a specific provision in the Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), which authorizes a court to dissolve or modify a ... shown." Carfagno , supra , 288 N.J. Super. at 433 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d)); see also Kanaszka v. Kunen , 313 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a6226-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17821

476 F.V., JR v. K.S.Q. -- rank: 387

... M.D.F. , 207 N.J. 458 , 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). We conclude there is ample evidence to support the ...

docket:	a2135-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25695

477 I.P. v. S.B -- rank: 387

... necessary, a judge must evaluate the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6) and, applying those A ...

docket:	a0009-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-09-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14362

478 L.M. v. D.M. -- rank: 385

... issue after 'an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ...

docket:	a1813-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11561

479 C.L.H. v. T.F.H. -- rank: 385

... prior acts in determining whether a restraining order was necessary. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401. Affirmed ...

docket:	a1827-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13282

480 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3602-19.opn.html -- rank: 382

... resolve that motion before entering the FRO. In this regard, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4) specifically states that '[a]t the hearing[,] the ... determination.' (emphasis added). Read in tandem, the necessary implication of N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4) and Rule 4:42-9(d) is that ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11767