Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

556 B.M. v. C.C. -- rank: 332

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ...

docket:	a0490-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15995

557 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT J. HULME -- rank: 330

... domestic violence final restraining order against him in 1999. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29. Defendant was convicted of contempt of an earlier domestic violence ...

docket:	a3857-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17639

558 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0156-20.opn.html -- rank: 330

... plaintiff was not entitled to counsel fees or costs. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4) (authorizing award of attorney's fees and costs ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	12692

559 T.R. v. L.R. -- rank: 327

... thing. This case highlights a potential conflict between the statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29, with respect to prior bad acts, and the evidence rule ...

docket:	a4466-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-02-09
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	65894

560 P.D v. E.D -- rank: 327

... self-evident." Id. at 127. Other times it is not. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) requires the court to consider "[t]he previous ...

docket:	a0663-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-08-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13606

561 V.A.C. v. S.J.C. -- rank: 325

... 413. To obtain an FRO based on harassment, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), a plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the ...

docket:	a0154-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16310

562 J.J. v. M.A. -- rank: 322

... the plaintiff and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse . . . ." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Finally, we are satisfied that plaintiff demonstrated her ...

docket:	a1704-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-10-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31606

563 E.N v. M.R -- rank: 322

... COURT DID NOT ADEQUATELY CONSIDER THE SIX STATUTORY CRITERIA AT N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE WAS A NEED ...

docket:	a1502-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10599

564 A.A. v. T.A -- rank: 322

... domestic violence proceedings to the non-abusive parent are temporary. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(11). The relationship between the domestic violence and its ...

docket:	a4724-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-11-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40226

565 L.V. VS. R.V. -- rank: 320

... G.M., 453 N.J. Super. at 12; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). A party requesting the dissolution of an FRO 'has ...

docket:	a3446-21
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29221

566 T.G. v. W.C. -- rank: 320

... s warning to defendant was also erroneous. In pertinent part, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) provides: If a criminal complaint arising out of the ...

docket:	a5177-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18447

567 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1300-20.opn.html -- rank: 320

... of attorney's fees is explicitly authorized by the Act. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4). The Act is to be liberally construed to ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24816

568 K.V. v. E.N. -- rank: 320

... dissolve or modify an FRO "[u]pon good cause shown." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). This provision in the statute delineates the grounds upon ...

docket:	a1918-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-02-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21311

569 E.R.,JR v. G.D -- rank: 317

... risk of unfairness and error. [ 207 N.J. at 488.] N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) states: The court shall consider but not be limited ...

docket:	a0878-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38907

570 SUSAN GENSINGER v. ORRIN GENSINGER -- rank: 317

... been considered, that consideration would have been amply supported by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29. The court was not required to draw an adverse inference ...

docket:	A2806-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-01-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55993