Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

586 D.A.C v. M.M.L -- rank: 295

... is without merit as the Act specifically addresses the issue. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 provides that, among other things, a judge may issue an ...

docket:	a2502-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11439

587 C.J.C v. K.A.M -- rank: 292

... N.J. Super. 112, 127 (App. Div. 2006) (relying on N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) and (b)). Judge Gramiccioni correctly observed that when the ...

docket:	a1208-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-12-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15199

588 C.N. v. E.C.G. -- rank: 292

... held within 10 days of the filing of a complaint. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). In H.E.C. v. J.C.S., 175 ...

docket:	a5185-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16703

589 C.A v. J.E.A -- rank: 290

... 568 (App. Div. 2013)). A-4512-19 4 Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), '[u]pon good cause shown, any final order may ...

docket:	a4512-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12577

590 S.H v. L.H -- rank: 285

... 412-13, (1998). Relief from an FRO is governed by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), which requires a showing of good cause. In Kanaszka ...

docket:	a2288-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	17388

591 B.B v. M.B -- rank: 285

... I'm sorry. I didn't see you there. Under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29, the trial court was required to consider any prior history ...

docket:	a4389-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17964

592 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1193-18.opn.html -- rank: 282

... s opinion and need not be repeated in this opinion. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) provides that a final order under the Prevention of ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	8767

593 K.J. v. K.P.F. -- rank: 282

... is generally provided little time to prepare and respond. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (requiring a final hearing within ten days of the ...

docket:	a2657-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11066

594 A.L.S v. M.S -- rank: 282

... see also J.D., 207 N.J. at 475-76; N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). 4 A-1843-16T1 This archive is a service ...

docket:	a1843-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12748

595 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5653-13.opn.html -- rank: 282

... the act of domestic violence. . . [including] reasonable attorney’s fees . . . ." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4). Such an award "requires no special showing, as ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	14170

596 KAREN M. WELCH v. WILLIAM B. WELCH, -- rank: 265

... ten days of the filing of the complaint pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). The court also described the good cause standard to ...

docket:	fm13-1006-94c
court:
decided:	2008-01-07
status:
citation:
Document Size:	40342

597 CAROLYN KOGUT v. RANDHIR JHAMB -- rank: 255

... not have been extended to include plaintiff's ex-husband. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 governs a trial court's grant of an FRO and ...

docket:	a5756-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-01-20
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	30326

598 C.G. v. K.Z. -- rank: 247

... Act, a FRO may be dissolved upon good cause shown. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). Good cause requires proof of changed circumstances between the ...

docket:	a1237-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10823

599 A.F.F v. C.H.G -- rank: 245

... 412-13 (1998). Relief from an FRO is governed by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), which requires a showing of good cause. "[T]he ...

docket:	a2063-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16771

600 STATE NEW JERSEY VS S.A. -- rank: 242

... s guns within 45 days of seizure as required by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29. The federal statute purportedly applicable is 18 U.S.C ...

docket:	a4814-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-05-14
status:	published
citation:	290 N.J.Super. 240
Document Size:	12745