Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 Dennis Culbert v. City of Jersey City -- rank: 362

... of the occupational disease provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-31. The Judge of Compensation found that petitioner’s occupational exposure ...

docket:	a-92-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2003-02-11
status:
citation:	175 N.J. 286
Document Size:	26772

62 MICHELLE MARIER - v. MARSHALL'S DEPARTMENT STORE - -- rank: 353

... to a particular trade, occupation, process or place of employment." N.J.S.A. 34:15-31(a). Petitioner, as the claimant for benefits, bears that burden ...

docket:	a4166-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16096

63 SIMON PETERSON v. HOME DEPOT SUPPLY -- rank: 317

... claiming an occupational disease must fulfill three requirements: First, as [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-31] provides, the petitioner must show that the disease is due ...

docket:	a5088-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25550

64 DEBORAH ROBINSON v. UNITED HOSPITAL -- rank: 301

... 2009, we granted petitioner's motion to supplement the record. N.J.S.A. 34:15-31 defines a "compensable occupational disease" to "include all diseases arising ...

docket:	a2134-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39929