Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 MICHAEL KERTESZ VS BARRY L. KORSH -- rank: 443

... rev'd on dissent , 32 N.J. 460 (1960). Under N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, an employee "is synonymous with servant, and includes all natural ... compelled considering the facts presented to the Judge of Compensation.      N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 barring casual employees from receiving Worker's Compensation benefits does ... inquiry. Ibid. The Supreme Court, in Graham , supra , stated that N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 "does not exclude all casual business employments merely because they ...

docket:	a3108-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-12-26
status:	published
citation:	296 N.J.Super. 146
Document Size:	29169

107 HECTOR REYES v. JOHN STANLEY -- rank: 443

... A. 34:15-1 to 15-128, and more particularly N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, rather than under AICRA, N.J.S.A. 39:6A ...

docket:	a4498-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22752

108 YAKUP ACIKGOZ v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY -- rank: 435

... N.J. Super. 337 , 344 (App. Div. 1985). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, employment commences "when an employee arrives at the employer's ...

docket:	A1758-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-23
status:	published
citation:	398 N.J.Super. 79 939 A.2d 805
Document Size:	53126

109 MARY LIU - v. BALLY'S CASINO - -- rank: 435

... of pain or discomfort without accompanying 'demonstrable objective medical evidence,' N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, does not satisfy a petitioner's burden of proving the ...

docket:	a0737-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44516

110 MARCO ANTONIO CRUZ - v. IVANIA PEREZ ALONZO - -- rank: 435

... Metals Exch., Inc. , 86 N.J. 19 , 28-29 (1981)). N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 defines an employee as being "synonymous with servant, and includes ... requiring the work to have been "regular, periodic or recurring." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. Alonzo was not engaged in the business of construction or ... of proving that his work was "regular, periodic or recurring." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The remaining argument advanced by Cruz, that reversal is required ...

docket:	a0444-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21237

111 CHERYL HERSH - v. COUNTY OF MORRIS - -- rank: 435

... employment, excluding areas not under the control of the employer. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-36.] After carefully analyzing case precedent, statutory language and legislative history ... compensable, as the Court reasoned that the term "control," in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, must be interpreted using the "'common sense' notion that the ...

docket:	a1442-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23417

112 JESSE J. COOPER, SR. v. BARNICKEL ENTERPRISES, INC. -- rank: 433

... operation of a vehicle on business authorized by the employer. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, L. 1979, c. 283, § 12, eff. January 10, 1980.] In ... at the time of the injury." Id. at 482 (quoting N.J.S.A. 34:15-36) . The C ourt explained that "[b]ecause off-premises employ ...

docket:	a1813-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-01-13
status:	Published
citation:	411 N.J. Super. 343 986 A.2d 38
Document Size:	43900

113 DARRIN L. HAVENS v. VIKING YACHT COMPANY -- rank: 433

... not constitute permanent disability within the meaning of this definition. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 (emphasis added).] The burden is on the petitioner to prove ...

docket:	a5446-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-05-03
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	75039

114 DENNIS BLAKE - v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK - v. SECOND INJURY FUND - -- rank: 430

... or marked improvement in such condition can be reasonably expected. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-36.] During the hearing, petitioner and several other witnesses testified, including ... or marked improvement in such condition can be reasonably expected." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The judge further found that petitioner's injuries, though significant ...

docket:	a1551-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	23513

115 MICHAEL GERITY v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 428

... total disability. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-27; N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. At the hearing, petitioner testified about his increasingly severe physical ... he was totally and permanently disabled, as set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, and as construed in Perez v. Pantasote, Inc., 95 N ...

docket:	a2021-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13876

116 SHARON JOHNSON - v. SABRETTS FOOD -- rank: 423

... He also determined petitioner was not totally and permanently disabled, N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, and entered a second order dismissing petitioner's application for ... of pain or discomfort without accompanying 'demonstrable objective medical evidence,' N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, does not satisfy a petitioner's burden of proving the ...

docket:	a4872-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-12-05
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	47976

117 JULIO OTOYA v. JERSEY CITY PARKING AUTHORITY -- rank: 420

... stipulations, the compensation judge made the following findings: Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, the [p]etitioner must make a satisfactory showing of objective ... v. W. Elec. Co. , 96 N.J. 220 , 226 (1984). N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 provides a statutory framework of the elements of proof of ...

docket:	a3772-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-02-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20771

118 TAWANNA FLOYD v. CAROL VON NEUDECK -- rank: 420

... 89 , 100-01 (1988). The premises rule is codified in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, and focuses substantially upon whether the accident in question occurred ...

docket:	a3855-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23472

119 KATHLEEN WALKER v. SAKER SHOP-RITE - -- rank: 420

... benefits is controlled by the premises rule set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. See Kristiansen v. Morgan, 153 N.J. 298, 316-17 ... employment, excluding areas not under the control of the employer . . . .' N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. 'The premises rule is based on the notion that an ...

docket:	a2770-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-09-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23748

120 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. DELTA PLASTICS CORPORATION et al. -- rank: 420

... the intentional wrong exception to the exclusive remedy provision of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. See Cent. Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Utica Nat'l ...

docket:	A2126-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-09-30
status:	published
citation:	380 N.J. Super. 532 883 A.2d 399
Document Size:	71662