Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5180-14.opn.html -- rank: 511

... of the employer, as employment not regular, periodic or recurring . . . . [N.J.S.A. 34:15-36.] 'Employer' is 9 A-5180-14T2 synonymous with master, and ... if a party is an 'employee' within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, our courts have developed two tests, which are (1) the ... Transportation for financial consideration, fulfilling the definition of employee under N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. There is no evidence he performed services for or was ... determination petitioner was respondent's employee within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, and therefore entitled to workers' compensation benefits for the injuries ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23768

62 DORIS CRANK v. PALERMO SUPPLY CO. , et al -- rank: 511

... on whether plaintiff was an employee within the context of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, which defines the term "'[e]mployer' . . . to be synonymous with ... At oral argument before us, we questioned the relevance of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 in light of N.J.S.A. 34:15-43 ... context of this statute. It appeared to us that, if N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 is irrelevant. Because the parties had not considered the issue ...

docket:	a5050-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-11-19
status:	published
citation:	326 N.J.Super. 84
Document Size:	21911

63 LORI FERGUSON - v. TRENTON BOARD OF EDUCATION - -- rank: 508

... days of the service of the notice of motion." 3 N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 defines temporary disability as an impairment that is permanent in ...

docket:	a3053-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40833

64 GERARD MARRA - v. RYDER TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES -- rank: 508

... or marked improvement in such condition can be reasonably expected." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The burden is also on the petitioner to prove all ... of pain or discomfort without accompanying 'demonstrable objective medical evidence ,' N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 , does not satisfy a petitioner's burden of proving the ...

docket:	a5274-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46425

65 GEORGE WASHINGTON v. RUNNELLS OPERATING, LLC and CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC -- rank: 508

... benefits is subject to the 'premises rule' set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. Kristiansen v. Morgan, 153 N.J. 298, 316 (1998). The ... employment, excluding areas not under the control of the employer . . . .' N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The premises rule is based on the notion that an ...

docket:	a3996-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-25
status:
citation:
Document Size:	21093

66 JENNIFER KOCANOWSKI v. TOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER -- rank: 506

... s receipt of temporary disability 6 This reference is to N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 to -48. 7 This reference is to the Act. 8 ...

docket:	a3306-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-11
status:	published
citation:	452 N.J.Super. 476 175 A.3d 968
Document Size:	42121

67 JAMES M. GARTLAND v. THE HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 506

... occur during the course of his employment as defined in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. In our view, petitioner was on a "special mission" for ... the "special mission" exception to the definition of employment in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. In Ehrgott , supra , 208 N.J. Super. at 395, the ... established a new 'place of employment,' within the contemplation of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, when he arrived in Perth and assumed control of the ... Texas Attorney General falls within the "special mission" exception to N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, because he was not engaged in an after hours activity ...

docket:	a5765-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40803

68 CARLA BURDETTE v. HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY -- rank: 506

... the judge of compensation misapplied the premises rule found in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 by basing his decision "upon the disposition of the vehicle ... benefits is controlled by the premises rule set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. See Kristiansen v. Morgan , 153 N.J. 298 , 316-17 ... employment, excluding areas not under the control of the employer." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. "The premises rule is based on the notion that an ...

docket:	a4797-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20322

69 Diane S. Lapsley v. Township of Sparta -- rank: 506

... excluding areas not under the control of the employer.” N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The Legislature used the phrase “excluding areas not under ... v. Morgan, 153 N.J. 298, 316 9 (1998) (citing N.J.S.A. 34:15-36). “The premises rule is based on the notion that ... excluding areas not under the control of the employer.” N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. We have explained that [t]he Legislature used the phrase ...

docket:	a-68-20
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	0000-00-00
status:
citation:
Document Size:	28821

70 JAMIE BENIMADHO v. SOMERVILLE BOROUGH FIRE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 503

... by [his] employer" at the time of his injury. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. He appeals from a decision by the judge of compensation ... when the employee leaves the employer's place of employment." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. However, the statutory definition for employment also includes the following ...

docket:	a2351-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20551

71 H.K.S., v. PAUL M. KENSEY -- rank: 503

... the Court interpreted the provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, permitting coverage for a ''[d]isability permanent in quality and ... of psychiatric disability.' Saunderlin, 102 N.J. at 405 (quoting N.J.S.A. 34:15-36). In reaching that result, the Court explicitly rejected 'the argument ... injuries satisfy the 'demonstrable objective medical evidence' standard prescribed by N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 for workers' compensation claims. 102 N.J. at 411. That ...

docket:	a1329-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-03-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34480

72 GEORGE ADAMS v. THE NEW YORK GIANTS -- rank: 498

... contends that since minor occupational conditions are not compensable under N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, his condition of traumatic arthrosis with left hip osteonecrosis would ...

docket:	A3120-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-07-03
status:	published
citation:	362 N.J. Super. 101 827 A.2d 299
Document Size:	33967

73 SYLVIA SIMMONS v. FEDERATED LOGISTICS -- rank: 496

... orthopedic disability, certainly not sufficient to meet the mandate of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 . . . . . . . . Another reason I am going to dismiss petitioner's occupational ...

docket:	A1978-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	83372

74 DIANE S. LAPSLEY v. TOWNSHIP OF SPARTA -- rank: 493

... petitioner's injuries were compensable pursuant to the premises rule, N.J.S.A. 34:15:36, which provides that '[e]mployment shall be deemed to commence ... employment, excluding areas not under the control of the employer . . . . [N.J.S.A. 34:15-36.] With the 1979 amendments, the going and coming rule was ... L. 72, (Sup. Ct. 1913), through the 1979 amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15- -36. Ehrlich v. Strawbridge & Clothier, 260 N.J. Super. 89, 90 ...

docket:	a0958-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-01-29
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	29491

75 John J. Williams v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey -- rank: 493

... function of the body or of its members or organs,� N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, or that the exposure was substantial enough to infer that ...

docket:	a-99-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2003-01-14
status:
citation:	175 N.J. 82
Document Size:	57572