Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 KAREN CONNOLLY v. TOWN OF BELVIDERE -- rank: 455

... benefits is controlled by the "premises rule" set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36; see Kristiansen v. Morgan , 153 N.J. 298 , 316-17 ... employment, excluding areas not under the control of the employer." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The premises rule is based on the notion that an ...

docket:	a6170-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24179

92 TONI LEE HIGH v. DANA ROSE -- rank: 453

... internal citations omitted), certif. denied , 195 N.J. 418 (2008). N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 states, in part , "[e] mployment shall be deemed to commence ...

docket:	a2539-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26650

93 INEZ GRAHAM v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY -- rank: 453

... ICT Group , 164 N.J. 367 , 373 (2000). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-36: "Disability permanent in quality and partial in character" means a ... of psychiatric disability require "demonstrable objective medical evidence" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The Court concluded that objective medical evidence may rest on ... for findings as to whether Graham satisfied the requirements of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. "[A]n expert opinion that a person has suffered a ...

docket:	a5419-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28778

94 ANDREW MACKOFF v. NEW BRUNSWICK SAW SERVICE - -- rank: 453

... direct performance of duties assigned or directed by the employer.' N.J.S.A. 34:15-36; see also Cooper, 411 N.J. Super. at 346. A ... 1973). Nonetheless, we note that in Jumpp, the Court acknowledged N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 expressed a 'clear legislative mandate sharply curtailing compensability for off ...

docket:	a3625-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16354

95 RICHARD MARCONI v. UNITED AIRLINES -- rank: 453

... that accidents occurring outside the workplace are not compensable. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. This exception may cover extra- territorial work related injuries, because ...

docket:	a0110-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-07-22
status:	Published
citation:	--- A.3d ----
Document Size:	37621

96 MICHAEL SAVIO v. MATTHEW V GIAMBRI, SR -- rank: 450

... and, thus, ineligible to receive benefits under the Act. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The scope of appellate review in workers' compensation matters is ...

docket:	a0701-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26870

97 LEONARD DI BERNARD V. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. -- rank: 450

... v. Pantasote, Inc. , 95 N.J. 105 , 114-116 (1984); N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. Where the permanent injury is total and the employee had ...

docket:	a6567-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-07-18
status:	published
citation:	303 N.J.Super. 280
Document Size:	15186

98 PATRICK LAFFEY V. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 448

... Perez v. Pantasote, Inc. , 95 N.J. 105 , 116 (1984).      N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 defines “disability permanent in quality and partial in character” as ...

docket:	a3851-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-04-10
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	42003

99 CHARLES L. TIGHE, JR. v. JACK TREBOUR MOTORCYCLES, LLC -- rank: 448

... direct performance of duties assigned or directed by the employer[.] [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-36] The objective of this amendment was to "sharply curtail [compensability ... direct performance of duties assigned or directed by the employer," N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, during that ride, performing what is referred to in the ... on the part of the definition of "employment" contained in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, which states: [T]he employment . . . of any employee who utilizes ...

docket:	A0205-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-10-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41410

100 MICHAEL F. FUGATT v. DENNISON GRAINE -- rank: 448

... direct performance of duties assigned or directed by the employer[.]" N.J.S.A. 34:15-36; see also Cooper , supra , 411 N.J. Super. at 346 ... and ends when the employee leaves the place of employment. N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. "The definition describing when employment begins and ends is known ...

docket:	a5353-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20185

101 JOSE VALDEZ, Petitioner- v. TRI-STATE FURNITURE -- rank: 445

... v. ICT Group , 164 N.J. 367 , 371-72 (2000); N.J.S.A. 34:15-36.         The meaning of "control" under the Act is more expansive ... certif. denied, 133 N.J. 435 (1993). The phrase in N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 excluding areas not under the employer's control from coverage ...

docket:	A1115-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-01-12
status:	published
citation:	374 N.J. Super. 223 863 A.2d 112
Document Size:	39230

102 CHARLOTTE M. BROOK VS JEFFREY A. APRIL, ET AL -- rank: 445

... bodies[,]" are explicitly subject to the scope of the LAD, N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, -43. There is no basis in the statutory scheme for ...

docket:	a6140-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-09-30
status:	published
citation:	294 N.J.Super. 90
Document Size:	28881

103 HIGH POINT INSURANCE COMPANY v. Drexel -- rank: 443

... 464 (App. Div. 1998). The pertinent statutory provision here is N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, which defines the worker's scope of employment, for purposes ... operation of a vehicle on business authorized by the employer. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-36.] This provision has been interpreted by our courts to only ... at 475. The Court agreed with our own observation that N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 expressed a "clear legislative mandate sharply curtailing compensability for off ...

docket:	a2030-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14710

104 RANDOLPH PERRY v. NEW JERSEY STATE RACING INDUSTRY -- rank: 443

... corporations, who perform service for an employer for financial consideration.... [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-36.] Applying that definition to Perry's status as a trainer ... any employees, he could have elected to purchase such coverage. N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 provides as follows: A self-employed person, partners of a ...

docket:	a4766-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-09-05
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	30718

105 LUVIA LOPEZ - v. LISA MOSER -- rank: 443

... was not an employee of respondent within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 and therefore did not qualify for workers' compensation benefits. Consistent ... compensation judge applied the legal tests for employment status under N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 too strictly in this case. Petitioner urges that she should ... law. Perez , supra , 288 N.J. Super. at 367. Under N.J.S.A. 34:15-36, a petitioner is eligible for workers' compensation benefits if he ...

docket:	a1535-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45061