Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 JEFFREY WARNER V. VANCO MANUFACTURING, INC. -- rank: 576

... remedy afforded an employee injured in the course of employment. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The Act expressly requires an employer to pay compensation to ...

docket:	a1807-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-04-08
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	21749

107 ESTATE OF ALFREDO PABATAO, ET AL. VS. PALISADES MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL. -- rank: 576

... will not be insulated from common-law suit.' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, two conditions must be satisfied: (1) the employer must know ...

docket:	a1740-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20585

108 JOANN BIANCO v. JENIRINE C SMITH-ROBOTHAM -- rank: 573

... remedy and fellow-servant provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendant. In this ... her employment. We are satisfied that this argument lacks merit. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 states: If an injury or death is compensable under [the ... the "fellow-servant rule," was created by the amendment of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 in 1961. L. 1961, c. 2, § 1. The immunity ... daycare. Accordingly, plaintiff's claim was barred by operation of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and summary judgment was properly granted. A ffirmed. This archive ...

docket:	a2651-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17648

109 SUSAN M. BUTTITTA v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. -- rank: 573

Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5263-07T1 A-5268-07T1 SUSAN M. BUTTITTA, Individually and as Executrix to the Estate of MARK BUTTITTA, Plaintiff-Respondent ...

docket:	a5268-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	202785

110 SUSAN M. BUTTITTA v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. -- rank: 573

Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5263-07T1 A-5268-07T1 SUSAN M. BUTTITTA, Individually and as Executrix to the Estate of MARK BUTTITTA, Plaintiff-Respondent ...

docket:	a5263-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	202785

111 MOHAMMAD F. AHAMMED v. JEFFREY P. LOGANDRO et al. -- rank: 573

... of action is barred by the exclusive remedy contained in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, the fellow-servant provision of the Workers' Compensation Act (the ... against defendant. 9 N.J. 56, 62 (1952). In 1961, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 was amended to provide immunity for co-employees from actions ...

docket:	a4993-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-06-27
status:	published
citation:	394 N.J. Super. 179
Document Size:	47862

112 KELVIN HOLMES v. JOSE ZAYAS -- rank: 567

... her employer and co-employees, except for intentional wrongs. 2 N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Basil v. Wolf , 193 N.J. 38, 53-54 (2007 ...

docket:	a0591-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37947

113 BETTY ANN KEARNEY v. BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY -- rank: 567

... Laidlow exception to the workers' compensation bar set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. See Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co ... an occupational disease. Millison , supra , 101 N.J. at 169; N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (surrender of other remedies); N.J.S.A. 34:15-31 (occupational diseases). However, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides a limited exception to the exclusive-remedy provisions of ...

docket:	a6202-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-13
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	83099

114 JOAN P. KELLY VS GERIATRIC AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. ET, AL -- rank: 567

... from bringing a tort action against her "special employer" by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 of the Workers' Compensation Act . We affirm.     Plaintiff, a licensed ... the workers' compensation statute's surrender of other remedies provision, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." Plaintiff responded that "at no time did she consider herself ...

docket:	a1001-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-02-29
status:	published published
citation:	287 N.J.Super. 567
Document Size:	26968

115 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a2542-15.opn.html -- rank: 564

... or her employer and co-employees, except for intentional wrongs. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. However, in a situation where an employee of one entity ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	22559

116 JOSEPH LASSANDRO v. THE PEP BOYS – MANNY MOE & JACK -- rank: 564

... 218 , 226 (App. Div. 1998). To implement this trade-off, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides: If an injury or death is compensable under this ... intentional wrong standard for overcoming the exclusive remedy provision of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Pursuant to Rule 4:46-2(c), we summarize the ...

docket:	a1897-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23696

117 CARLOS SERPA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 564

... Za for the workers' compensation benefits paid to plaintiff. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. That statute precludes an employee from suing the employer in ... the job, unless caused by the employer's intentional wrong. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. In exchange for this loss of tort rights, the employee ... the limited ability to sue employers for intentional wrongdoing, see N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 and Laidlow v. Hariton Mach . Co., Inc. , supra , 170 N ...

docket:	a4421-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-07-11
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 371
Document Size:	45922

118 RICHARD BELLOMY v. JAMES A. ALAMO -- rank: 560

... wrong" exception to the Workers' Compensation Act's bar in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. In October 2006, FCI moved for summary judgment pursuant to ... the trial court found that plaintiffs' claims were barred under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which provides in pertinent part: If an injury . . . is compensable ... of our courts in holding the "intentional wrong" exception in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "applicable in only rare and extreme factual circumstances." Kibler v ...

docket:	a2413-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-10-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34448

119 RICHARD BELLOMY v. JAMES A. ALAMO -- rank: 560

... wrong" exception to the Workers' Compensation Act's bar in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. In October 2006, FCI moved for summary judgment pursuant to ... the trial court found that plaintiffs' claims were barred under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which provides in pertinent part: If an injury . . . is compensable ... of our courts in holding the "intentional wrong" exception in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "applicable in only rare and extreme factual circumstances." Kibler v ...

docket:	a2636-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-10-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34456

120 ALVERSE CANNON v. BRAVO PACK, INC -- rank: 560

... of its employees occurring during employment from an intentional wrong. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. In a series of cases, our Supreme Court has set ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, two conditions must be satisfied: (1) the employer must know ...

docket:	a1702-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23025