Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

121 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0605-16.opn.html -- rank: 560

... Wireless, Inc. (PCS) as barred by the exclusive remedy provision, N.J.S.A. 34:15- 8, in the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34 ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong. [N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.] The intentional wrong exception to the exclusivity of relief provided ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	28338

122 JAMES MACKENZIE v. MACY'S INC -- rank: 557

... a determination that their product liability action was barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N ... 167 (App. Div.), certif. denied , 154 N.J. 608 (1998). N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides, in relevant part, If an injury or death is ...

docket:	a2264-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28540

123 JUSTIN FITZPATRICK v. VREELAND BROTHERS LANDSCAPING -- rank: 557

... related injuries, except for claims based on an "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. "[A]n employer who causes the death or injury of ... thereby entitling a plaintiff to avoid the 'exclusivity' bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8[.]" Millison , supra , 101 N.J. at 176. There, the plaintiffs ...

docket:	a4726-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29907

124 ARMANDO GONZALEZ et al. v. IDEAL TILE IMPORTING CO., INC., and KOMATSU FORKLIFT, U.S.A., INC. -- rank: 554

... to be Ideal's employee and his claim barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which generally renders an employee's workers' compensation claim the ... was plaintiff's employer and, thus, insulated from suit by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, even though plaintiff was also an employee of EMI, which ...

docket:	a4676-02
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-07-22
status:	published
citation:	371 N.J. Super. 349
Document Size:	58208

125 DANIEL AQUILINO CALVA CALLE Administrator ad prosequendum of the Estate of CHRISTIAN DANIEL CALVA SIGUENA, Deceased and DANIEL AQUILINO CALVA CALLE individually v. HITACHI POWER TOOLS, AMERICAN STYLE CONSTRUCTION, INC HITACHI KOKI, USA , LTD., and HIT -- rank: 554

... by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and that there is no evidence that it committed an ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong . [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (emphasis added).] Our case law has made it explicitly clear ... Millison , an employer will not be afforded the immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 when two conditions are met: (1) the employer knows that ...

docket:	a1985-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55765

126 LASHAWN WEST et al. v. RAW POWER, INC., et al. -- rank: 551

... wrong." Ibid. (Internal quotations omitted). This exclusive remedy established by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "embodies 'an historic trade-off whereby employees relinquish their right ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." Ibid. "When evaluating whether a claimant has satisfied those two ...

docket:	a5514-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	56690

127 GARY ANDRESS v. CHRISTOPHER BUCKMAN -- rank: 551

... already in the course of employment when the accident occurred. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; McDaniel v. Man Wai Lee , 419 N.J. Super. 482 ...

docket:	a0334-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17597

128 METODI DONCHEV v. DENNIS DESIMONE -- rank: 545

... employee's injuries arise from an employer's "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Laidlow v. Hariton Mach. Co., Inc. , 170 N.J. 602 ...

docket:	a0395-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-09-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26596

129 JAMES HARRIS v. LARRY MITCHELL, et al. -- rank: 542

... co- employee of plaintiff, thus barring plaintiff's suit under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.     The existence of an employee's right to receive workers ... accident. N.J.S.A. 34:15-40. However, under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, the employee is barred from filing a third-party action ... by federal law makes Mitchell plaintiff's co-employee under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Resolution of that issue requires an examination of the history ...

docket:	A0232-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-03-14
status:	published
citation:	358 N.J. Super. 504 818 A.2d 443
Document Size:	26129

130 WEN XUE SHEN v. DO DO PLASTICS INC. CO., LTD., et al. -- rank: 539

... Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 to -127. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 states in relevant part: If an injury or death is ... namely whether an employee may escape from the confines of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 and sue an employer in court, is the Millison/Laidlow ... their degree, are subject to the "exclusive remedy" bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Millison , supra , 101 N.J. at 183, 184. A substantial ...

docket:	A0040-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43204

131 ALVERSE CANNON v. BRAVO PACK, INC -- rank: 539

... any and all intentional wrongs within the exception allowed by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 including but not limited to, bodily injury caused or aggravated ... any and all intentional wrongs within the exception allowed by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 including but not limited to, bodily injury caused or aggravated ...

docket:	a1731-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25775

132 MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC ASSOCIATES VS. PAUL HAWRYLUK -- rank: 536

... Co. , 107 N.J. Super. 189 , 193 (App. Div. 1969); N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.     As noted, supra , the Act is a form of remedial ...

docket:	a0249-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-12-30
status:	published
citation:	317 N.J.Super. 338
Document Size:	24519

133 RUTH ESTHER GUERRERO PARADES v. PASH APPAREL, INC. -- rank: 536

... management and control positions satisfying the "intentional wrong" standard of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, see , e.g. , Laidlow v. Hariton Machine Co. , 170 N ... a cause of action under the "intentional wrong" standard of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 as interpreted and applied in case law, is not an ...

docket:	a6317-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18465

134 JANET CUMMINGS v. TUSCAN DAIRIES -- rank: 536

... to whether defendant's conduct constituted an "intentional wrong" under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which would remove the bar of the Workers' Compensation Act ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong . [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (emphasis added).] "Because the [Workers' Compensation] Act involved a historic ... their degree, are subject to the "exclusive remedy" bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Millison , supra , 101 N.J. at 183. A substantial or ...

docket:	A3062-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49956

135 ALEXANDER DIMATTIES v. ECHELON GLEN APARTMENTS, ECHELON GLEN MANAGEMENT -- rank: 536

... to satisfy the intentional wrong exclusion to the bar. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We disagree with the judge's conclusion and reverse. Considering ... wrong." Ibid. (internal quotations omitted). This exclusive remedy established by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "embodies 'an historic trade-off whereby employees relinquish their right ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." Ibid. "When evaluating whether a claimant has satisfied those two ...

docket:	A2420-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42284