Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 YAN PING WANG v. ST. PETERS HOSPITAL, INC. -- rank: 533

... did not fit the intentional wrong exception to this bar. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The judge granted summary judgment, concluding that plaintiffs did not ...

docket:	A4009-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51706

137 MICHAEL J. FENDT v. ADAM L. ABRAHAMS JULIUS D ABRAHAMS, JV PAVING and JEFFREY R. VALVANO - -- rank: 533

... or death would result, thereby overcoming the exclusive remedy provision, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, in the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act). N.J.S ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.] The intentional wrong exception to the exclusivity of relief provided ...

docket:	a2333-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	27111

138 BOBBY ROBINSON v. TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORP OF NEW JERSEY,1 and AIR JOY HEATING AND COOLING INC. and PARAMOUNT HOMES AT ASBURY URBAN RENEWAL LLC TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORP. OF NEW JERSEY and PARAMOUNT HOMES AT ASBURY URBAN RENEWAL LLC v. HARLEYS -- rank: 530

... therefore entitled to immunity for any alleged negligence pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We review the facts and procedural history relevant to the ... law remedies even if the employer has been negligent. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (providing that "[i]f an injury . . . is compensable" under the ...

docket:	a1370-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-28
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	27639

139 ROBERT L. FISHER, et al. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. -- rank: 527

... whether the exclusive-remedy provision of the workers' compensation statute, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, bars plaintiffs from filing a common law tort action against ... remedy provision of the New Jersey Workers Compensation Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (emphasis added).] After completion of full discovery, defendant moved for ... for summary judgment based on the workers' compensation bar in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8: [A]s a practical matter, when an employee sues an ...

docket:	A2672-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-10-27
status:	published
citation:	363 N.J. Super. 457 833 A.2d 650
Document Size:	37576

140 LINDA A. WEJNERT v. MCCAIN FOODS USA, INC -- rank: 518

... of the Work ers' Compensation Act exclusive remedy provision. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. A-1525-18T1 2 that it failed to safely store ...

docket:	a1525-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-03-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39632

141 STEPHEN BUYNIE, et al. v. AIRCO, INC., et al. -- rank: 518

... may seek both workers' compensation benefits and common-law remedies. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "precludes employees who have suffered occupational disease from maintaining a ...

docket:	A3193-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	99554

142 JUNE BERGEN v. ABLE ENERGY, INC. -- rank: 518

... exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and that the employer's conduct did not constitute an ... damage to these properties was in excess of $500. II. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that when, by express or implied agreement, the parties ...

docket:	a5095-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-02
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	41951

143 JUNE BERGEN v. ABLE ENERGY, INC. -- rank: 518

... exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and that the employer's conduct did not constitute an ... damage to these properties was in excess of $500. II. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that when, by express or implied agreement, the parties ...

docket:	a5074-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-02
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	41952

144 JEANETTE BLACKSHEAR v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC -- rank: 515

... for injuries sustained by employees in the course of employment, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 allows relief from the exclusivity bar in cases of intentional ...

docket:	a3525-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30955

145 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a4307-14.opn.html -- rank: 515

... was immune from suit under the Workers' Compensation Act. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. She does not appeal that ruling, so the liability of ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	44198

146 CONG SU v. DAVID'S COOKIES -- rank: 515

... wrong." Ibid. (internal quotations omitted). This exclusive remedy established by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "embodies 'an historic trade-off whereby employees relinquish their right ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." Ibid. "When evaluating whether a claimant has satisfied those two ...

docket:	a1121-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23146

147 JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. RENEE LEMPKE -- rank: 512

... employer for injuries arising out of the course of employment, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; see, e.g. , Kristiansen v. Morgan , 153 N.J. 298 ...

docket:	a5336-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22035

148 MAGDALENA JAROSZ v. G&B LLC -- rank: 509

... law remedies even if the employer has been negligent. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (providing that "[i]f an injury . . . is compensable" under the ... related injuries, except for claims based on an "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. "[A]n employer who causes the death or injury of ...

docket:	a0790-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43168

149 JULIO & RITA ESTRADA V. HENDRICKSAW CORP., ET ALS -- rank: 509

... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (second paragraph). As a result, a "co-employee" of an ... as plaintiff, the "fellow employee" or "co-employee" immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 literally and contends that the immunity applies only to "an ... act which allegedly caused the accident.     The second paragraph of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, quoted above, was adopted in 1961. As a result, the ...

docket:	a6015-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-20
status:	published
citation:	302 N.J.Super. 262
Document Size:	11984

150 JOHN DUTCHER v. PEDRO PEDEIRO -- rank: 503

... for a waiver of the right to sue their employer. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. For purposes of workers' compensation, a worker may have two ...

docket:	a1088-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41010