Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

196 BRYAN WILLIAMS and MERNA WILLIAMS, his wife v. PARKWAY MOTORS OF LEONIA, INC. -- rank: 396

... conduct qualifies as an "intentional wrong" within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 if: "(1) the employer [knows] that his actions are substantially ...

docket:	A0928-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-03-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51953

197 JOHN T. CARLIN v. CORNELL HEGARTY & KOCH -- rank: 393

... avoid the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, the injured plain­tiffs alleged that the CHK defendants intentionally ...

docket:	a1984-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	66963

198 GERALDINE D. DURHAM v. SOUTH STATE, INC. -- rank: 393

... and shall bind the employee . . . as well as the employer . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.] It is a fundamental principle that "'an employee, for the ...

docket:	a2232-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56111

199 SAMUEL MACCARONE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 387

... employer for employees injured in a work-related incident. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Beseler , supra , 188 N.J. at 546; Kibler v. Roxbury ...

docket:	a5028-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21585

200 LAWRENCE G. BOTTS, III v. LAFAYETTE CAMPBELL, LLC -- rank: 384

... other remedies provision of the Worker's Compensation Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff ...

docket:	a0664-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-09
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	33845

201 VINCENT PETRECCA, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF OCEAN, ROBERT URIE and JOHN STEINHAUER -- rank: 378

... of the bar contained in the Workers' Compensation Act, specifically N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Since we have not been supplied with a transcript of ...

docket:	A2340-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-11
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	36191

202 WALDERMAN WIZZARD et al. v. MARCIA WIZZARD -- rank: 374

... defense the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Plaintiff contended that his claim was not barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 because defendant's actions constituted an "intentional wrong." After the ...

docket:	a6266-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-08-01
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	22922

203 KEITH SELBY v. NEW CARSON HILLS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP a/k/a SUMMIT ASSOCIATES and NEW CARSUN HILLS LP (incorrectly designated as New Carson Hill LP and SUMMIT ASSOCIATES Defendants/Third-Party v. CREST-FOAM, INC Third-Party Defendant -- rank: 371

... N.J.S.A. 35:15-1 to -128. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The Act provides an employee with an exclusive remedy against ...

docket:	a3105-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27271

204 CAROLYN OPILLA v. KAREN PARKER, et al. -- rank: 368

... that the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, bars plaintiff's common law tort claims. The facts as ...

docket:	A1255-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-09-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38172

205 FERNANDO ROA v. LAFE ROA -- rank: 362

... subject to the two-year statute of limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, or was otherwise barred by the same statute of limitations ...

docket:	a2588-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-07-07
status:	published
citation:	402 N.J.Super. 529 955 A.2d 930
Document Size:	63190

206 ESTATE OF SAMUEL SELLINO v. PINTO BROTHERS DISPOSAL LLC -- rank: 362

... 218, 226 (App. Div. 1998). To implement this trade-off, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides: If an injury or death is compensable under this ...

docket:	a2064-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29473

207 CARMEN MAYORGA v. RUSSO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -- rank: 353

... the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act (WCA), N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, barred Bryn's third-party claim against Chase. The court ...

docket:	a2124-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-06-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35580

208 FRANCISCO LAGONIGRO v. LaVECCHIA GROUP, LLC -- rank: 350

... argument proceedings. The exclusive workers' compensation remedy provision contained in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 barred plaintiff's Law Division claim against his employer based ...

docket:	a4515-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-08-03
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	33506

209 MIKAEL ANDREOLI v. STATE INSULATION CORPORATION -- rank: 338

... because of the exclusivity bar of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. However, as we have noted, plaintiff alleged in the first ...

docket:	a2636-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35568

210 ROBERT KLIER, SR., et al. v. SORDONI SKANSKA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 338

... by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, particularly N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, from asserting a claim for personal injuries against Mazzocchi, or ...

docket:	A2854-98
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-01-26
status:	published
citation:	337 N.J. Super. 76
Document Size:	43240