Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 DONALD & JOANNA HAWKSBY VS JOSEPH DEPIETTO, M.D. & ET ALS -- rank: 606

... a fellow employee, was immune from a tort action under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The trial court denied plaintiff's request that the matter ... 53 N.J. 582 (1969). This principle is codified in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which provides that "[i]f an injury . . . is compensable under ... s argument that this case is outside the bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 has some appeal. We have determined, however, to reject the ...

docket:	a1939-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-03-09
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	38020

92 KATHERINE & EDWARD DUNN VS COUNTY OF MORRIS -- rank: 603

... agency of Morris County, that this suit was barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and granted the motion.     On appeal, Dunn contends:     I.    SINCE ... granted immunity from common law negligence suits by ... employees." Ibid. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 specifically provides that an employee whose injury is covered by ... negligence based upon the same injury.     Morris County claims that N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 bars this negligence suit by Dunn because it is based ...

docket:	a4271-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-02-28
status:	published
citation:	298 N.J.Super. 212
Document Size:	16779

93 WADE STANCIL v. ACE USA -- rank: 597

... an order should fall within the intentional wrong exception of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. That exception has been consistently applied only to conduct by ...

docket:	a1438-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-02-01
status:
citation:	418 N.J. Super. 79 12 A.3d 223
Document Size:	48852

94 MEDWIN SOTO v. ICO POLYMERS NORTH AMERICA -- rank: 597

... employee's injuries result from the employer's "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; see also Laidlow v. Hariton Mach. Co. , 170 N.J ... her employer committed an "intentional wrong." Id. at 169; see N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Although the Legislature did not intend the workers' compensation system ...

docket:	a3858-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45223

95 MARGARITA SORIANO v. 70 HUDSON STREET REALTY, LLC -- rank: 597

... swift recovery independent of proof of fault.' Ibid. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-8: If an injury or death is compensable under this article ...

docket:	a0490-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41390

96 LINO LEMUS v. CATERPILLAR CORPORATION -- rank: 594

... would be injured, and thereby overcoming the exclusive remedy provision, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, in the Workers' Compensation Act (the Act). N.J.S ... related injuries, except for claims based on an "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. "[A]n employer who causes the death or injury of ... thereby entitling a plaintiff to avoid the 'exclusivity' bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8[.]" 101 N.J. at 176 . There, the plaintiffs asserted claims ...

docket:	a4069-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29506

97 KAREN CONNOLLY v. TOWN OF BELVIDERE -- rank: 594

... to amend its answer to assert the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, as an additional defense. 3 Plaintiff opposed the motion, attesting ... from pursuing a negligence action against her employer, the County. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of plaintiff's Law Division ... the courthouse annex was located at 199 Hardwick Street. 3 N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that, with exceptions not relevant here, the Workers' Compensation ...

docket:	a6170-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24179

98 Frank Caraballo v. City of Jersey City Police Department -- rank: 594

... Co., Inc., 170 N.J. 602, 611 (2002) (referring to N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 as “the so-called exclusive remedy provision”). The Act ...

docket:	a-71-17
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2019-03-25
status:
citation:	237 N.J. 255 204 A.3d 254
Document Size:	43950

99 MAURO RAMOS v. JAMES DURR WHOLESALE FLORIST -- rank: 594

... to the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We hold that in appropriate circumstances a claim against an ... to the intentional wrong exception to the workers' compensation bar, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The suit alleged that over the years, as far back ... the workers' compensation bar or exclusive remedy provision set by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 would preclude recovery. After the UIM arbitration was concluded, Ramos ...

docket:	a1033-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38874

100 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4711-18.opn.html -- rank: 591

... surrender of other forms of remedies.' Id. at 459 (citing N.J.S.A. 34:15-8). Hocutt contends the trial court misinterpreted the statute in ruling ... under the WCA because Minda's conduct constitutes intentional wrong. N.J.S.A. 34:15- - 8 provides: If an injury or death is compensable under this ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	46014

101 JAMES STABILE v. MARY STABILE BENSON -- rank: 588

... recovery obtained by Harris in his personal injury action. 5 N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. 6 This appraisal was submitted by one of the Stabile ...

docket:	a4009-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47601

102 Rose v. Burger -- rank: 588

... 142, and, therefore, are barred as a matter of law. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Van Dunk v. Reckson Assocs. Realty Corp. , 210 N.J ... seeking further legal redress from an employer or co-employee. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Van Dunk v. Reckson Assocs. Realty Corp. , 210 N.J ... the case satisfies the statutory exception for an intentional wrong. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that [i]f an injury or death is compensable ...

docket:	a1000-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26159

103 GHATTAS HABASHI v. INTERBAKE FOODS, INC -- rank: 588

... in applying the exclusivity bar of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, under the facts of this case. We have considered this ... who commits an "intentional wrong" will not be insulated by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 from a common law suit). Defendant further argued that plaintiff ... carve out an exception to the exclusivity bar contained in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 thereby permitting plaintiff to pursue a products liability claim against ... references to plaintiff, in the singular, are to Ghattas Habashi. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides: Such agreement shall be a surrender by the parties ...

docket:	a0912-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-07-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41118

104 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3869-19.opn.html -- rank: 579

... their employers and co-employees for on-the-job injuries. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Volb v. G.E. Cap. Corp., 139 N.J. 110 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	70612

105 MIRTALA PINEDA v. HECTOR ZULUETA -- rank: 579

... wrongs. Walrond , supra , 382 N.J. Super. at 234 (citing N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus. , 103 N.J. 177 (1986 ...

docket:	a1552-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21667