Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

121 Peter DeLisa v. County of Bergen, et als. -- rank: 567

... the Court's opinion focused first on the provisions of N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, which, in relevant part, provides:         An employer shall not take ... employers or public bodies concerning co employee misconduct encompassed by N.J.S.A. 34:19-3. III     In view of our conclusion about the correct interpretation ...

docket:	a-71-99
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2000-07-25
status:
citation:	165 N.J. 140
Document Size:	32546

122 DANIEL FLAHERTY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 567

... Inc. , 305 N.J. Super. 605 , 610 (App. Div. 1997)). N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 provides, in pertinent part, An employer shall not take any ...

docket:	a2375-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43149

123 MICHAEL MRAZ v. LOCAL 254 OF THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS -- rank: 564

... when the employee engages in protected "whistle-blowing" activity. See N.J.S.A. 34:19-3; Winters v. N. Hudson Reg'l Fire & Rescue , 212 N ...

docket:	a2424-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26940

124 WILLIAM EDWARDS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION -- rank: 564

... Co. , 277 N.J. Super. 378 , 412 (Law Div. 1994). N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 declares that "[a]n employer" may not take retaliatory action ...

docket:	a4738-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60055

125 JAREER ABU-ALI v. PINNACLE FOODS GROUP, LLC -- rank: 562

... he or she performed a "whistle-blowing" activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ...

docket:	a1895-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-09-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45824

126 GEORGE AYAD v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 562

... DuPont Chambers Works , 206 N.J. 243 , 256 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 34:19-3). To establish a prima facie CEPA claim, a plaintiff must ... the environment." Donelson , supra , 206 N.J. at 256 (quoting N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a) and (c) (internal quotation marks omitted). "'Retaliatory action' means ...

docket:	a5153-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45575

127 EILEEN A. EMBREY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 559

... believe to be illegal, fraudulent, criminal, or against public policy. N.J.S.A. 34:19-3. CEPA defines retaliatory action as "the discharge, suspension or demotion ...

docket:	a6499-06
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-08-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	104144

128 L.M.P.,1 v. HIGH POINT REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT RIPLEY and JONATHAN TALLAMY -- rank: 557

... fails to prove the third prong of the test. See N.J.S.A. 34:19-3. Although [p]laintiff's motivations for retiring are unclear, none ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] To bring a claim under CEPA, a plaintiff must demonstrate ... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19- 3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ...

docket:	a1111-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27166

129 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1756-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 557

... retiree or pensioner of the employer or any governmental entity[.] [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 (emphasis added).] CEPA's "purpose is to protect and encourage ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	39018

130 KELLY A. SPINA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 557

... retiree or pensioner of the employer or any governmental entity[.] [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 (emphasis added).] CEPA's "purpose is to protect and encourage ...

docket:	a6028-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39823

131 CHARLES KANE v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC GAS -- rank: 555

... establish the first prong of his prima facie case under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a), namely that he reasonably believed that PSE&G's ... regulation promulgated A-5021-16T1 7 pursuant to law.' 2 N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1); see Kolb v. Burns, 320 N.J. Super ... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19- 3[]; (3) an adverse employment action was taken A-5021-16T1 ... retaliatory action against an employee' because of whistle-blowing activity. N.J.S.A. 34:19-3. The statute defines 'retaliatory action' as 'the discharge, suspension or ...

docket:	a5021-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25965

132 BRENDA GROSLINGER v. TOWNSHIP OF WYCKOFF -- rank: 555

... refusing to participate with the employer in an illegal act. N.J.S.A. 34:19-3. Certainly Groslinger was privileged not to sign the letter, but ...

docket:	a5861-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-01-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56307

133 WAYNE MCCAW v. VERNON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 552

... Co. of Am. , 192 N.J. 110 , 120 (2007) (citing N.J.S.A. 34:19-3). To establish a prima facie case of a CEPA violation ... he or she performed a "whistle-blowing" activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... law, and that he performed a whistle-blowing activity under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c) by filing his 2007 PEOSHA complaint. Plaintiff also suffered ...

docket:	a0875-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	54597

134 YOUNG V. SCHERING CORPORATION -- rank: 552

... Bd. of Educ. , 138 N.J. 405 , 417-18 (1994). N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 defines the class of employee actions protected by CEPA, and ...

docket:	a-113-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-07-11
status:
citation:	141 N.J. 16
Document Size:	52948

135 Barbara R. Fleming v. Correctional Healthcare Solutions, Inc. -- rank: 550

... a co-employee's activity, policy, or practice covered by N.J.S.A. 34:19-3”). However, each court found that Fleming's whistle blowing was ... workplace conduct to any individual defined as a “supervisor” in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 (emphasis added).] Importantly, “supervisor” is defined as any individual with ...

docket:	a-39-99
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2000-06-07
status:
citation:	164 N.J. 90
Document Size:	48957