Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 34:19-3")   16 to 30 of 227 results. Run time: 0.592 seconds | Search time: 0.588 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 Previous 15 Next 15
16 JAMES D. BORDONE v. PASSAIC PUBLIC LIBRARY TRUST -- rank: 755
... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... 451, 462 (2003)).] Plaintiff's CEPA claim was brought under N.J.S.A. 34:19- 3(c)(1) to (3) which precludes an employer from taking ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment.' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(1) to (3). Plaintiff alleges he reasonably believed that ... subsections. '[W]hen a plaintiff brings an action pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c), the trial court must identify a statute, regulation, rule ... at 464. 'A plaintiff who brings a claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3[(c)] need not show that his or her employer or ... or public body about an alleged violation of the law. N.J.S.A. 34:19-3. 14 A-2299-15T4 The third element involves retaliation ...
docket: a2299-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-05-18
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 74313
17 DALILA CZUKERBERG v. STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 752
... Guinn alleging violations of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, (count one); wrongful termination (count two); intentional infliction of emotional ... including any activity, policy or practice of deception or misrepresentation . . . . [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a).] CEPA also permits recovery for retaliation when, as described in subsection (c) of N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, an employee '[o]bjects to, or refuses to participate in ... first two, which appear in subparts (1) and (2) of N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c), are identical to subsection (a)'s first two subparts ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment.' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3). In determining what constitutes a prima facie case ... A-4955-18 20 To sustain a claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3)—CEPA'S protection from retaliation for ...
docket: a4955-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-03-26
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 102659
18 DR. MYRON A. MEHLMAN V. MOBIL OIL CORP. ET AL -- rank: 752
... clear mandate of public policy that Mobil had violated. See N.J.S.A. 34:19-3. The case proceeded to trial. We conclude that the trial ... school library in Armenia following an earthquake there. Footnote: 9 N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 provides: An employer shall not take any retaliatory action against ...
docket: a438-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-06-13
status: published
citation: 291 N.J.Super. 98
Document Size: 106246
19 TAMARA SEPULVEDA v. TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN -- rank: 750
... she did not engage in protected activity as required by N.J.S.A. 34:19-(3)(a) of CEPA, but we reverse as to DeLeon and ... employer . . . that the employee reasonably believes' is unlawful or fraudulent. N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a). Specifically, an activity is unlawful when it 'is in ... law, or a rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to law,' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1). An employee is also protected where he or ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment.' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3). A plaintiff asserting a CEPA claim must establish ... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... believed the conduct at issue was against a law under N.J.S.A. 34:19- 3(a)(1) or was incompatible with a 'clear mandate ...
docket: a0795-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-03-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 45244
20 TODD KELLY v. J. CHRISTIAN BOLLWAGE -- rank: 748
... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] CEPA defines 'retaliatory action' as 'the discharge, suspension or demotion ...
docket: a2083-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-08-02
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 63808
21 Michael Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, Inc. -- rank: 745
... CEPA after the time of the events in dispute. See N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(2) (adding that fraud includes “any activity, policy ... which the employee reasonably believes: . . . . (2) is fraudulent or criminal; [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 (2004 version).] The required proof elements for a CEPA action ... the whistle about that activity as defined in CEPA. See N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c). The third question is whether plaintiff demonstrated that there ... precedents. A CEPA claim that is based on fraud, see N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(2), -3(c)(2), can rest on allegations about ... 177 N.J. at 462 (concluding that claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(1) does not require showing that one’s ... or misrepresentation which the employee reasonably believes may defraud[,]” N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 (2013), we do not consider it. 9 As the ...
docket: a-86-11
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2013-07-17
status:
citation:
Document Size: 134984
22 MEG YATAURO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 736
... CONDUCT, POLICIES, OR PRACTICES OF THE EMPLOYER AS REQUIRED BY N.J.S.A. 34:19-3([a]) AND ([c]). II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING ... evidence of retaliation. CEPA – via the various terms of N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 – prohibits an employer from taking 'any retaliatory action' against ... including any activity, policy or practice of deception or misrepresentation .... [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a).] CEPA also permits recovery for retaliation when, as described in subsection (c) of N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, an employee 'objects to, or refuses to participate in any ... first two, which appear in subparts (1) and (2) of N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c) are identical to subsection (a)'s first two subparts ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment.' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3). In determining what constitutes a prima facie ...
docket: a2132-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-12-02
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 46769
23 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0352-19.opn.html -- rank: 719
... we note that plaintiff's CEPA claim is brought under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c). In this regard, plaintiff testified that she was retaliated ... and] statutory violations in the purchase of the MedSelect machines.' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c) prohibits retaliatory conduct by an employer against an employee ... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 59039
24 FERNANDO PINIERO v. DIVISION OF STATE POLICE -- rank: 717
... construed liberally. Abbamont , supra , 138 N.J. at 431. CEPA, N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, prohibits employers from taking "any retaliatory action" against an employee ... of the environment. [ 9 ] The final category of claims, under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3), "evidences a legislative recognition that certain forms of ... violation of the LAD. These complaints clearly constitute whistleblowing under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1) and (c)(1). 10 Moreover, in the various ... of federal and state law. These complaints constitute whistleblowing under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1). Additionally, plaintiffs complained that their superiors may have ... criminal law. Therefore, these complaints also constitute whistleblowing activity under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1) and (2), and (c)(1) and (2). Other ... environment," such that plaintiffs' complaint would constitute whistleblowing activity under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3). Indeed, plaintiffs made no allegation that these ...
docket: a3494-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-07-17
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 110486
25 MELISSA C. MORRIS v. GREITZER AND LOCKS OF NEW JERSEY, L.L.C. -- rank: 717
... clients, with no proof of the same." The judge summarized N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, the relevant CEPA provision. He further described the allegations respecting ... N.J. 279 (2003). Kolb cited the relevant CEPA provision, N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, as it existed in 2000, 7 which provided in pertinent ...
docket: a4861-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-08-20
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 93842
26 MELISSA C. MORRIS v. GREITZER AND LOCKS OF NEW JERSEY, L.L.C. -- rank: 717
... clients, with no proof of the same." The judge summarized N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, the relevant CEPA provision. He further described the allegations respecting ... N.J. 279 (2003). Kolb cited the relevant CEPA provision, N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, as it existed in 2000, 7 which provided in pertinent ...
docket: a4672-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-08-20
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 93835
27 MARGARET GIBSON v. 11 HISTORY LANE OPERATING COMPANY MARGARET GIBSON v. 11 HISTORY LANE OPERATING COMPANY -- rank: 715
... we must in this posture of the case. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1), employers are prohibited from retaliating against an employee ... criminal," or "incompatible with a clear mandate or public policy. . . ." N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(1) to –3(c)(3). A plaintiff who brings a cause of action pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3[(c)] must demonstrate that: (1) he or she reasonably believed ... he or she performed a "whistle-blowing" activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3[(c)]; (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... 2004) interpreted the "clear mandate of public policy" language in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3) to convey[] a legislative preference for a readily ... Rodriguez's order constituted an "improper quality of patient care," N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1), and violated or, at the very least, ...
docket: a4567-12 a4567-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-02-25 2014-02-25
status: unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 54753
28 JAMES HITESMAN v. BRIDGEWAY INC. -- rank: 715
... TRW, Inc. , 164 N.J. 598, 609-10 (2000). 5 N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 provides, in pertinent part: An employer shall not take any ... policy; (2) he performed a "whistle-blowing" activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3; (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him; and ...
docket: a0140-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-03-22
status: published
citation: 430 N.J.Super. 198 63 A.3d 230
Document Size: 66215
29 State v. Ivonne Saavedra -- rank: 710
... LAD and CEPA. N.J.S.A. 10:5-12; N.J.S.A. 34:19-3; see also Battaglia v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 214 N ...
docket: A-68-13
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2015-06-23
status:
citation: 222 N.J. 39 117 A.3d 1169
Document Size: 119115
30 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3896-19.opn.html -- rank: 703
... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3[(a) or (c)]; (3) an adverse employment action was taken ... including any activity, policy or practice of deception or misrepresentation[.] [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a).] Or, relevant to this appeal: Objects to, or refuses ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c).] Third, a CEPA plaintiff must demonstrate he or she ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 35355
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!