Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 34:19-3")   91 to 105 of 227 results. Run time: 0.415 seconds | Search time: 0.412 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 16 Previous 15 Next 15
91 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3947-18.opn.html -- rank: 590
... welfare or protection of the environment. A-3947-18T2 10 [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] To establish a prima facie case of retaliation under CEPA ... he or she performed the whistle-blowing activity described in [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a), (c)]; (3) an adverse employment action was taken against ... second factor, plaintiff arguably performed a whistle blowing activity under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a), (c) by objecting to eliminating any mandatory positions or ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 42196
92 KORYN RUSSELL v. THE GIFT GROUP, INC -- rank: 590
... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a) or (c)]; (3) [a retaliatory] action was taken against ... the employee reasonably believes . . . is in violation of a law .' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a) and (c). 'CEPA 'does not require a plaintiff to ... requirement that an employee who brings a CEPA claim under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3 must show 'a causal connection exists between the whistle- blowing ...
docket: a0326-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-12-06
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23484
93 ARKADIUSZ LUKASZEWSKI v. JASTICON, INC. -- rank: 590
... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] A valid CEPA claim has four requirements: (1) the employee ... 2) the employee "performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity" specified in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) the employer took "an adverse employment action" against ...
docket: a0610-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-06-22
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 48769
94 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1917-18.opn.html -- rank: 590
... law, or a rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to law,' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a)(1), or '[o]bject[ed] to, or refuse[d ... law, or a rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to law,' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(1). To establish a prima facie claim under CEPA ... he or she performed a 'whistle[]blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... no support for plaintiff's argument . A-1917-18T1 17 N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c). Overall, the weight of the evidence shows plaintiff's ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 38953
95 SALVATORE PUGLIA v. ELK PIPELINE, INC. -- rank: 585
... 279 (2003).] Plaintiff asserts he suffered unlawful retaliation based on N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, which prohibits retaliatory conduct for disclosing unlawful activities. CEPA prohibits ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] The trial judge rejected plaintiff's complaint as framed, instead ...
docket: a0886-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-10-10
status: published
citation: 437 N.J.Super. 466 100 A.3d 191
Document Size: 48374
96 TARANCE BRYANT v. LIBERTY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC. -- rank: 583
... of the four elements of a CEPA claim, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c). Judge Iglesias issued an order dismissing the complaint without ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a), (c).] To establish a CEPA violation under section 3 ...
docket: a0023-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-12-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 33969
97 RICHARD KOWNACKI v. SADDLE BROOK BOARD OF EDUCATION RICHARD KOWNACKI v. SADDLE BROOK BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 583
... he or she performed a "whistle-blowing" activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] Plaintiff's CEPA retaliation claim rests on sections c(1 ...
docket: a5548-11 a5548-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-05-08 2014-05-08
status: unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 50316
98 TARANCE BRYANT v. LIBERTY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC. -- rank: 583
... of the four elements of a CEPA claim, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c). Judge Iglesias issued an order dismissing the complaint without ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a), (c).] To establish a CEPA violation under section 3 ...
docket: a0134-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-12-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 33970
99 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3680-18.opn.html -- rank: 583
... Twp. Bd. Of Educ., 138 N.J. 405, 431 (1994)). N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c), in relevant part, states that an employer shall not ... to law. A plaintiff bringing a cause of action under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c) must show that: (1) they reasonably believed their employer ... regulation; (2) they performed a whistle-blowing activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against them ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 39285
100 RICHARD BECK VS CLAUDE TRIBERT & ET AL -- rank: 583
... body or a supervisor of illegal employer conduct is sufficient. N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, subd. a. Under Pierce, however, there must be actual notification ...
docket: a1841-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-06-15
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 48179
101 TARANCE BRYANT v. LIBERTY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC. -- rank: 583
... of the four elements of a CEPA claim, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c). Judge Iglesias issued an order dismissing the complaint without ... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a), (c).] To establish a CEPA violation under section 3 ...
docket: a3659-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-12-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32821
102 CLARK MOTLEY v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE -- rank: 581
... 3) is incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] To make a claim under CEPA, plaintiff must file a ...
docket: a3566-07
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-11-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 50273
103 AMA ARMAH v. EDUCATION AFFILIATES INC -- rank: 581
... public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] To establish a prima facie case under CEPA, a plaintiff ... he or she performed a "whistle-blowing" activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ... Court explained that a "clear mandate of public policy" under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(3) conveys[:] a legislative preference for a readily discernable ...
docket: a4644-13
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-08-26
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 61525
104 MAUREEN GREENFELD v. B.C.T. IMPORTS, INC -- rank: 581
... the employee reasonably believes[] is in violation of a law . . . .' N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(1). 12 A-3815-15T3 regulations. Plaintiff contends on ... retiree or pensioner of the employer or any governmental entity . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c)(1) to (2).] Prohibited retaliatory action includes an employee ... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in [ N.J.S.A.] 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ...
docket: a3815-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-06-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 74771
105 JAMESPOWELL v. WACHOVIA CORPORATION -- rank: 578
... retiree or pensioner of the employer or any governmental entity; [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(a), -3(c)(1), -3(c)(2).] Prohibited retaliatory action ... he or she performed a 'whistle-blowing' activity described in N.J.S.A. 34:19-3(c); (3) an adverse employment action was taken against him ...
docket: A1727-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-04-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 53459
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 16 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!