Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 RITA STARNER v. SCOTT HAEMMERLE -- rank: 709

... of the No-Fault Act applied to dune buggies. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35. In the Appellate Division, the majority concluded that ...

docket:	a0153-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23533

47 Christina DiProspero v. Barbara J. Penn, et al. -- rank: 700

... insurance policy subject to the limitation on lawsuit threshold under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to –35, provides automobile insurance policyholders with a choice ... the Legislature enacted the “‘New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act,’” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1, commonly referred to as the “No Fault Act.” Caviglia v ... VI. In conclusion, we hold that the plain language of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to –35, does not contain the “serious life impact” requirement ...

docket:	a-66-03
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2004-11-29
status:
citation:
Document Size:	73117

48 CATHRYNE M. LOFTUS-SMITH V. GREGORY A. SMITH, ET AL -- rank: 700

... 6A-12 of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35 (No-Fault Law), prohibits an injured party from ...

docket:	a1720-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-23
status:	published published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	39433

49 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN MILLENNIUM INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 695

... The New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act [(No Fault Act)], N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to 6A-35, . . . requires every automobile liability insurance policy to ...

docket:	a0013-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	57168

50 PEGGY BIRMINGHAM v. TRAVELERS NEW JERSEY INS. CO -- rank: 690

... S.A. 39:6A-4, and its interpretative case law. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, or the New Jersey A-0429-21 17 ...

docket:	a0429-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-31
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	48813

51 STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 688

... Div. 2001), where the court, construing the no-fault statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, held that coverage was to be decided ... construing provisions of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1, et seq., our Supreme Court has favorably noted "approaches which ...

docket:	a5972-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-04
status:	published
citation:	439 N.J.Super. 532 110 A.3d 132
Document Size:	24604

52 FEDERICO BENCOSME v. JOSEPH KANNANKARA -- rank: 688

... s purpose. New Jersey's No Fault Act (the Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, was "intended to serve as the exclusive remedy ...

docket:	a1672-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42650

53 COMPREHENSIVE PAIN SOLUTIONS OF NEW JERSEY PC v. OMNI INSURANCE COMPANY c/o GOOD 2 GO AUTO INSURANCE -- rank: 683

... pursuant to the New Jersey Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35. Plaintiff demanded payment based on the deemer ...

docket:	a0862-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-03-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27139

54 JENNIFER LAMBERT v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 683

... system established by the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, that the workers' compensation insurer effectively stepped ...

docket:	a1073-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-24
status:	published
citation:	447 N.J.Super. 61 145 A.3d 1095
Document Size:	46388

55 PETER A. LIQUARI, III v. JENNIFER COMBS -- rank: 683

... benefits is a fundamental part of the No-Fault Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, first enacted in 1972, L. 1972, c. 70 ... unnecessary costs' which had resulted in increased premiums.' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1(b)). AICRA implemented standard courses of treatment (Care Paths ...

docket:	a3924-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64996

56 DENTISTS FOR QUALITY CARE, INC. et al. v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF DENTISTRY, Respondent. -- rank: 678

... for determining whether treatments or diagnostic tests are medically necessary[.] [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1.]     The regulation of reimbursable "medical expenses" to those that ... a key feature of the reforms contained in AICRA. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 (delineating the purposes of AICRA); New Jersey Coalition of ...

docket:	a4348-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-04-10
status:	published
citation:	339 N.J. Super. 257
Document Size:	20921

57 AYOTOLANI OGUNTUASE v. THE ESTATE OF ANTOINETTE J. DANGERFIELD -- rank: 676

... our Legislature enacted the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, with the goal of 'preserv[ing] the ... Haines v. Taft, 237 N.J. 271, 287 (2019) (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1(b) (1998)). In AICRA, the Legislature 'adhered to A ... the right to sue for non - serious injuries.'' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1(b) (1998)). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 ...

docket:	a3641-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21846

58 Prevratil v. Mohr -- rank: 673

... forth in New Jersey's no-fault, automobile-insurance statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35. The verbal threshold provision, if elected by persons ...

docket:	a-52-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-07-10
status:
citation:	145 N.J. 180
Document Size:	99179

59 ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES v. THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE -- rank: 671

... DOBI), pursuant to the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35. Plaintiff Orthopaedic Associates, as subrogee of its patient ... the same time reducing unnecessary costs which drive premiums higher." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1. As set forth in the Legislature's findings and ... mechanism need[ed] to be established [to] accomplish this goal." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1. See also N.J. Coalition , supra , 323 N.J ...

docket:	a5591-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-01-20
status:	published
citation:	405 N.J.Super. 54
Document Size:	60548

60 SAMUEL MACCARONE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 666

... compulsory insurance requirements as a result of the enactment of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -34 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 ... The New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act ("No Fault Act"), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -20, further mandates that every liability policy insuring automobiles ...

docket:	a5028-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21585