Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 GERARD NORTESANO v. DAVID TORRES-ROMERO -- rank: 666

... PIP coverage within the meaning of our no-fault law, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, thereby subjecting him to the policy's verbal ... result of an automobile accident or caused by an automobile. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1, -4. Our no-fault law exempts holders of PIP policies ...

docket:	A0521-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-12-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43924

62 Danielle Davidson v. Raymond A.Slater , et al. -- rank: 664

... verbal” threshold of the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35. The Court has been asked whether, in ... verbal” threshold of the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35. We have been asked whether, in order ...

docket:	a-84-05
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-01-30
status:
citation:	189 N.J. 166
Document Size:	75107

63 RUTGERS CASUALTY INS. CO. VS THE OHIO CASUALTY INS. CO. -- rank: 661

... the Legislature enacted the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35 (Act), also commonly referred to as the "No ...

docket:	a4103-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-04-01
status:	published
citation:	299 N.J.Super. 249
Document Size:	35044

64 Tracey A. Johnson and Christopher Johnson v. Benedict A. Scaccetti -- rank: 657

... lawsuit threshold of the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35. Once a plaintiff suffers a single bodily ... lawsuit threshold of the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, accepts, in exchange for lower insurance premium ... Insurance Cost Reduction Act, L. 1998, c. 21 (codified at N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35), the Legislature’s most recent enactment implementing ...

docket:	a-36-06
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-07-31
status:
citation:	192 N.J. 256
Document Size:	70283

65 TITO COBO v. MARKET TRANSITION FACILITY -- rank: 649

... consistent with the PIP fee schedules.     The No-Fault Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, mandates that automobile liability insurance policies provide PIP ...

docket:	a1968-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-08-15
status:	published published
citation:	293 N.J.Super. 374
Document Size:	53476

66 ROIG V. KELSEY -- rank: 649

... Automobile Freedom of Choice and Cost Containment Act of 1984, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, is a sponsor statement that explains the options ...

docket:	a-43-93
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1994-05-19
status:
citation:	135 N.J. 500
Document Size:	52493

67 Rosa Aponte-Correa v. Allstate Insurance Company -- rank: 649

... the provision of the No Fault Insurance Act (the Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, that prescribes limitations periods for suits arising out ...

docket:	a-82-98
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2000-02-01
status:
citation:	162 N.J. 318
Document Size:	64523

68 PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY , v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 649

... the New Jersey Automobile Reparations Reform Act (No- Fault Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, does not expressly permit inter-company reimbursements amongst ...

docket:	a2830-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-27
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	29518

69 NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION v. SANDRA SANCHEZ -- rank: 647

... 8(a), of the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to - 35. A-0761-17T3 2 The motion judge, relying ... specifically states that the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, does not limit 'the right of recovery, against ...

docket:	a0761-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-04
status:	Published
citation:	457 N.J.Super. 98 197 A.3d 1158
Document Size:	36055

70 Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company v. Robert LaCroix, et al. -- rank: 647

... in the New Jersey Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J. S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, likewise imposes a requirement that insurers promptly ... in the New Jersey Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, likewise imposes a requirement that insurers promptly ...

docket:	a-128-06
court:
decided:	2008-05-14
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	88308

71 HALINA JABLONOWSKA v. DAVID P. SUTHER et al. -- rank: 645

... as amended by the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35.     In response to the motion, plaintiff stated ...

docket:	A0462-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-02-13
status:	published
citation:	390 N.J. Super. 395 915 A.2d 617
Document Size:	31297

72 ASHOK A. MODY v. GERALDINE BROOKS et al. -- rank: 642

... is barred by the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35. (No Fault Act or "Act"), in particular N ...

docket:	a5002-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-04-16
status:	published
citation:	339 N.J. Super. 392
Document Size:	23199

73 STUART SACKMAN v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 642

... provision pursuant to the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, requiring plaintiff to show he suffered a ...

docket:	a3230-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-26
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 278 137 A.3d 1204
Document Size:	66188

74 JORGE O. CAVIGLIA et al. v. ROYAL TOURS OF AMERICA et al. -- rank: 640

... enacted New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No Fault Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, amended from time to time, comprehensively revised by ...

docket:	a3493-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-11-08
status:	published
citation:	355 N.J. Super. 1
Document Size:	26607

75 SEAVIEW ORTHOPAEDICS v. NATIONAL HEALTHCARE RESOURCES, INC., et al. -- rank: 640

... is inequitable or unfair, and violates our no-fault laws ( N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35). We agree with the motion judge that plaintiffs ... the same time reducing unnecessary costs which drive premiums higher . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 (emphasis added).]     In summary, the principle purposes driving the ... at 239 (citing 30 N.J.R. 3211 ); see also N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 ("It is generally recognized that," among other things, "inappropriate ... Facility , 293 N.J. Super. 374 , 384 (App. Div. 1996) ( N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1, by inhibiting their right to arbitrate. We reject this ...

docket:	a3599-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-02-13
status:	published
citation:	366 N.J. Super. 501
Document Size:	41622