Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 JULIE ANN KIMBLE v. DREW N. LAVISTA -- rank: 593

... to introduce into evidence "outstanding medical bills in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12." Plaintiff 1 cross-appeals and argues the trial judge erred ... uncompensated expenses, including, but not limited to, medical expenses."); and N.J.S.A . 39:6A-12 (stating that evidence of amounts collectible or paid to an ... Super. 110 , 126 (Law Div. 2012), the court held that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 does not preclude recovery of medical expenses beyond those collectible ...

docket:	a2120-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35203

17 JOHN K. DEVER v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 588

... otherwise payable pursuant to the policy's PIP coverage provisions. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, which pre-dated AICRA, but as amended continues to specifically ... In Roig , supra , a pre-AICRA case, the Court construed N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 to bar reimbursement of PIP deductible amounts and co-payments ... We also understand the Legislature had no intention to interpret N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 to preclude a victim in an automobile accident from recovering ...

docket:	a3102-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60408

18 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Licensed Beverage Insurance Exchange -- rank: 577

... the tortfeasor for the amounts collectible or paid under PIP [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12]," Aetna had no right to recover reimbursement from the wrongdoer ...

docket:	a-90-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-07-31
status:
citation:	146 N.J. 1
Document Size:	45567

19 CRESENCIO ESPINAL, et al. v. MARINO ARIAS, HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 577

... 156 N.J. Super. 208 , 213 (App. Div. 1978) (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 requires such an instruction. In part, the statute says: The ... by a health insurer, health maintenance organization or governmental agency . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 (emphasis added).] The Supreme Court has promulgated a model charge ...

docket:	A2445-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-08
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	71041

20 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, CO. -- rank: 570

... bodily injury by such injured person.' Id. at 562 (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12). Thus, the Court reasoned that the No-Fault Act had ...

docket:	a5624-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-23
status:	Published
citation:	459 N.J.Super. 223 208 A.3d 888
Document Size:	30742

21 MARTIN V. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 563

... cases "under 39:6A-4," then the evidential exclusion rule, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, might not apply. That statute limits subrogation rights and prohibits ... 1994) ("creation of any subrogation right would be inconsistent with [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12]"). Similarly, the exemptions from tort liability for non-economic loss ... D.N.J. 1993) (holding that evidential exclusion rule in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 barred evidence at trial of amounts paid by plaintiff for ...

docket:	a-114-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-07-31
status:
citation:	141 N.J. 279
Document Size:	46930

22 TODD MISKELLY v. RICHARD L. LORENCE, JR. -- rank: 560

... supra , 374 N.J. Super. at 394-95.] See also N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, which specifically states that evidence regarding collections of personal injury ...

docket:	a4884-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-13
status:	published
citation:	380 N.J. Super. 574
Document Size:	37537

23 CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY VS. BLANCHE MCCLELLAND -- rank: 553

... J.S.A. 39:6A-6, the evidence bar of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, or the verbal threshold statute, N.J.S.A. 39 ... loss was entirely economic and therefore outside the scope of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 specifically states that the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act ... tortfeasor, of uncompensated economic loss sustained by the injured party." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12. Had McLaughlin not had a work-related accident, he could ...

docket:	a4739-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-03-01
status:	published
citation:	288 N.J.Super. 185
Document Size:	16030

24 NEW JERSEY INTERGOVERNMENTAL INSURANCE FUND v. RICHARD SAROKIS -- rank: 532

... reached to receive Sarokis' driving credentials. Plaintiff nevertheless argues that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 authorizes an injured insured to seek from "the tortfeasor, [an ... PIP benefits received from his own auto-insurance carrier under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12. Thus, because PIP benefits are paid by the injured party ... uncompensated" expenses and cannot be recovered from the tortfeasor under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12. As correctly noted by Judge McGann, plaintiff's invocation of ... benefits are considered to be "neither collectible nor paid" under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, and so an injured insured is not precluded by the ...

docket:	a0200-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28877

25 MARY WALSH v. STARR TRANSIT -- rank: 530

... fully deducted from any award plaintiff received from the jury. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, of our No Fault Compulsory Automobile Liability Insurance Law precludes ... is not a benefit precluded from introduction into evidence by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 of our No Fault law. The applicable statute is N ...

docket:	a4340-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-01-25
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	54445

26 SOFIA T. TORRES v. JAVIER PABON -- rank: 525

... charge" directing them to disregard plaintiff's medical expenses. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12; Espinal v. Arias , 391 N.J. Super. 49 , 62-63 ...

docket:	a2216-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61837

27 PAULETTE DORFLAUFER v. PMA MANAGEMENT CORP -- rank: 521

... decision is based on our interpretation of Section 40 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12. To interpret a statute, we first examine its plain language ... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-6. In accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, there is no reimbursement for medical bills paid through PIP ... 2009). Particular to reimbursement of PIP benefits in civil actions, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 specifically states that the "amounts collectible or paid for medical ...

docket:	a1727-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20836

28 Sofia T. Torres v. Javier Pabon -- rank: 509

... medical expenses as an element of damages, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12. We hold that those five improper rulings, which affected both ... J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], otherwise compensated.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12. The statute provides: The court shall instruct the jury that ... 156 N.J. Super. 208 , 213 (App. Div. 1978) (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12). In accordance with the statute, Model Jury Charge (Civil) � ...

docket:	A-116-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2016-06-01
status:
citation:	225 N.J. 167 137 A.3d 502
Document Size:	92686

29 BEVERLY A. WOOTEN et al. v. DONNA M. MARTILLA et al. -- rank: 506

... consideration by a jury exists. In Roig , the Court construed N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 to bar reimbursement of deductible amounts and co-payments, reasoning ...

docket:	a4470-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-03
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31498

30 DANIELLE L. YEOMANS v. PIA L FRAZIER -- rank: 483

... 53A-1 to -5 and the set-off provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12, and entered judgment in the amount of $932,300 plus ...

docket:	A2628-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-05-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	68799