Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 KARON K. JOHNSON v. ROSELLE EZ QUICK LLC -- rank: 775

... death, was in an occupational status, earning or producing income." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(d). In Gambino v. Royal Globe Insurance Cos. , 86 N ...

docket:	a4244-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-25
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	70247

17 JOHN K. DEVER v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 749

... from recovering uncompensated economic losses from a tortfeasor. AICRA added N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(k), which defines "economic loss" to specifically include "uncompensated loss ... not affect claims for economic loss, such as lost wages, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(k), "we have also recognized that if a plaintiff fails ...

docket:	a3102-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60408

18 JOHN K. CUPIDO v. WILLIAM PEREZ -- rank: 744

... of this section. "Automobile" means an automobile as defined in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2]. [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4.] The statute ... defines the term "automobile" by referencing the definition contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. That statute defines "automobile" in relevant part as meaning: [A ... or business of the insured other than farming or ranching. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a).] N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(j) defines the term "motor vehicle" by referencing the definition ... 39:1-1 "exclusive of an automobile as defined in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a)]." N.J.S.A. 39:1-1 defines "motor ...

docket:	a4557-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-27
status:
citation:	415 N.J. Super. 587 2 A.3d 1159
Document Size:	30499

19 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2101-19.opn.html -- rank: 742

... Relying on the definition of 'named insured' set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g), he reiterated that Frederick was not a named insured ... in effect at the time of the cessation of residency. [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g).] However, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b ... definition is nearly identical to that of 'named insured' under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g). A-2101-19 17 USAA does not dispute that ... A named insured 'names' a spouse within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g) by identifying that person as a household resident when ... the statutory requirements for an additional 'named insured.'' Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g)). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 requires every ... to provide PIP coverage to named insureds as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g). A 'named insured,' her resident spouse, and her ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34622

20 STEPHEN ROBERTS v. MALVYN ST. LOUIS -- rank: 737

... accident, he was not driving an "automobile" as defined in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a). The remaining issue, Roberts' claim for underinsured motorist coverage ... appeal followed. II. Roberts argues that the motion judge misapplied N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a), as interpreted in Estate of Leeman v. Eagle Ins ... J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, specifically in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a). "Automobile" is defined, in pertinent part, as follows: a ... or business of the insured other than farming or ranching. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a) (emphasis added).] A plain reading of the statute suggests ... work as a customary business use for the purposes of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a). In Leeman , the decedent died following a one-vehicle ... the pick-up truck was an "automobile" as defined in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a). Leeman , supra , 309 N.J. Super. at 533- ...

docket:	a1173-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-11-17
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25568

21 DAVID GOYCO v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 716

... determined that plaintiff was not a pedestrian, as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(h), and was, therefore, denied personal injury protection (PIP) benefits ... not meet the definition of a qualifying automobile pursuant to [ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A- 2(a) of the New Jersey Auto Insurance Law. Therefore, New ... 39:6A-4.] A-3471-21 3 Furthermore, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(h) of the New Jersey Auto Insurance Law, the Segway ... of the No-Fault statute and is not controlling over N.J.S.A 39:6A-2(h), et. seq. Further, the No-Fault Statute, N.J ... pedestrian' under NJ.S.A. 39:6A-2(h). Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(h), 'any person who is not occupying, entering into, or ... begin our analysis by reference to the plain text of N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 2(h), which defines 'pedestrian' as 'any person who is ...

docket:	a3471-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17580

22 ESTATE OF CAREY LEEMAN VS EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 714

... whether the pick-up met the definition of "automobile" under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, "automobile" is defined as:         a private passenger automobile of a ... sites. Id. at 440. The issue presented called for interpreting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a)'s definition of "automobile." We held that the pick ...

docket:	a5477-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-03-09
status:	published
citation:	309 N.J.Super. 525
Document Size:	27444

23 NEW JERSEY HEALTHCARE COALITION v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE NEW JERSEY COALITION FOR QUALITY HEALTHCARE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BA -- rank: 698

... necessity"). This language tracks the statutory definition of "medically necessary," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(m). Subsection (m) also authorizes the Department to determine the ...

docket:	a1792-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-31
status:	published
citation:	440 N.J.Super. 129 111 A.3d 716
Document Size:	54194

24 NEW JERSEY HEALTHCARE COALITION v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE -- rank: 698

... necessity"). This language tracks the statutory definition of "medically necessary," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(m). Subsection (m) also authorizes the Department to determine the ...

docket:	a1038-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	53853

25 NEW JERSEY HEALTHCARE COALITION v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE -- rank: 698

... necessity"). This language tracks the statutory definition of "medically necessary," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(m). Subsection (m) also authorizes the Department to determine the ...

docket:	a1445-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	53853

26 NEW JERSEY HEALTHCARE COALITION v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE -- rank: 698

... necessity"). This language tracks the statutory definition of "medically necessary," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(m). Subsection (m) also authorizes the Department to determine the ...

docket:	a1636-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	53853

27 NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION v. SANDRA SANCHEZ -- rank: 688

... of medical expenses and wage loss, not noneconomic loss. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(k). The verbal threshold does not apply to economic loss ...

docket:	a0761-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-04
status:	Published
citation:	457 N.J.Super. 98 197 A.3d 1158
Document Size:	36055

28 Jimenez v. Baglieri -- rank: 688

... impairment . . . .      [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a.] Footnote: 3 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2 defines “noneconomic loss” as “pain suffering and inconvenience.” This archive ...

docket:	a-25-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-01-29
status:
citation:	152 N.J. 337
Document Size:	38166

29 AIG CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GREGORY R. THOMPSON -- rank: 683

... Mutual. Because the dump truck was a commercial vehicle, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a) and -4, there was no PIP coverage provided by ...

docket:	a4358-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23003

30 CATHERINE CANNIZZARO v. ALEJANDRO CORONEL -- rank: 676

... which falls under the definition of a "standard" policy, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(n), must include $5000 of property damage liability coverage; may ... lawsuit option," which precludes them from suing for noneconomic loss. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, -3.1(b) and (c). We have held that the ...

docket:	a5640-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39601