Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:6a-2")   31 to 45 of 69 results. Run time: 0.830 seconds | Search time: 0.823 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 Previous 15 Next 15
31 CATHERINE CANNIZZARO v. ALEJANDRO CORONEL -- rank: 676
... which falls under the definition of a "standard" policy, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(n), must include $5000 of property damage liability coverage; may ... lawsuit option," which precludes them from suing for noneconomic loss. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, -3.1(b) and (c). We have held that the ...
docket: a4949-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-11-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 39601
32 JACOB BOYD v. PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE CORPORATION -- rank: 668
... although those charges were not "medical expenses" as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(e). Boyd claimed that, in his case, High Point had ... PIP benefits. Boyd claimed that High Point's practice violated N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(e), N.J.A.C. 11:3-28.6(a ...
docket: a1379-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-05-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26830
33 ESTATE OF MIKE ALEXANDER v. GEMINI INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 655
... 39:1-1, exclusive of an automobile as defined in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a)] . . . .' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(j). N.J.S.A. 39:1-1, in turn ...
docket: a2773-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-07-11
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 48302
34 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, CO. -- rank: 650
... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4; and then citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a)). As a self- insured entity without PIP coverage, CEVA ...
docket: a5624-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-05-23
status: Published
citation: 459 N.J.Super. 223 208 A.3d 888
Document Size: 30742
35 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. VS EILEEN CROCKER -- rank: 647
... provisions of the PIP statute similarly ignored. See , e.g. , N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2 (definitions); N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 (medical ...
docket: a3686-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-03-08
status: published
citation: 288 N.J.Super. 250
Document Size: 18572
36 ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING -- rank: 647
... passenger automobile of a private passenger or station wagon type . . . ." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. Similarly, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 mandates the ...
docket: a5900-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-12-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29339
37 JACQUELINE JOHNSON v. REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 640
... bus did not fit within the statutory definition of "automobiles," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, and reversed summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint for failing ...
docket: A3968-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-03-16
status: published
citation: 391 N.J. Super. 194 917 A.2d 803
Document Size: 44663
38 DANA M. WARNIG v. ATLANTIC COUNTY SPECIAL SERVICES, et al. -- rank: 637
... generally limited to accidents involving an "automobile" as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. A regulatory provision, N.J.A.C. 11:3-7 ...
docket: a6671-01
court: njappellate
decided: 2003-10-27
status: published
citation: 363 N.J. Super. 563
Document Size: 26522
39 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., VS ORTHOPEDIC EVALUATIONS, INC. -- rank: 637
... required in order to qualify particular services for reimbursement under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, -4 and -5, provisions of the Automobile Reparation Reform Act ...
docket: a2240-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-05-02
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 26757
40 CATHERINE CANNIZZARO and ARTHUR LAZROVICH, jointly named as Administrators Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Catherine Ann Cannizzaro, deceased v. ALEJANDRO CORONEL, ANDREWS AUTO AGENTS, EDWARD BIERSTINE, JR ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY - and P -- rank: 637
... which falls under the definition of a "standard" policy, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(n), must include $5000 of property damage liability coverage; may ... lawsuit option," which precludes them from suing for noneconomic loss. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, -3.1(b) and (c). We have held that the ...
docket: a4948-09
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-11-01
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 40995
41 Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company v. Robert LaCroix, et al. -- rank: 627
... being the resident spouse of a named insured. Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g)). Thus, as the equivalent of a named insured regardless ...
docket: a-128-06
court:
decided: 2008-05-14
status:
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 88308
42 MONIQUE ARTWELL v. SEA SCAPE LANDSCAPING LLC -- rank: 624
... Because the Sea Scape truck was a commercial vehicle, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a) and -4, it was not required to be insured ...
docket: a4324-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-03-27
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35713
43 Tracey A. Johnson and Christopher Johnson v. Benedict A. Scaccetti -- rank: 617
... 7       Footnote: 1 “‘Noneconomic loss’ means pain, suffering and inconvenience.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(i). Footnote: 2 The facts are based on the record ...
docket: a-36-06
court: njsupreme
decided: 2007-07-31
status:
citation: 192 N.J. 256
Document Size: 70283
44 ANTHONY J. ADRIGNOLO JR v. JEAMAKA T. EMEJURU -- rank: 612
... J.S.A. 39:6A-8(a). 2 Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(k), "'[e]conomic loss' means uncompensated loss of income or ... to, medical expenses." "'Noneconomic loss' means pain, suffering and inconvenience." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(i). This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...
docket: a4272-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-10-04
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15546
45 GEICO v. JACQUELINE NELSON -- rank: 609
... being the resident spouse of a named insured. Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g)). Thus, as the equivalent of a named insured regardless ... meet the statutory requirement for an additional "named insured" under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g), and the judge declined to examine the "spouse-like ...
docket: a0638-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-10-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37582
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!