Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 RITA STARNER v. SCOTT HAEMMERLE -- rank: 607

... fell within 'the literal statutory definition of an automobile' at N.J.S.A. 39:6A- -2, which included 'a private passenger automobile of a private passenger ...

docket:	a0153-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23533

47 NICOLE PIERIDES v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 607

... policies providing direct insurance on an automobile as defined in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, issued in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A ...

docket:	a2783-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	90263

48 EXCHANGE v. SABRINA A. PEREZ -- rank: 604

... J. at 420. This is known as the "standard policy". N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(n). But, "notwithstanding" the mandate in subsection (a), an owner ...

docket:	a3100-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-13
status:	published
citation:	432 N.J.Super. 526 75 A.3d 1233
Document Size:	36937

49 ASHOK A. MODY v. GERALDINE BROOKS et al. -- rank: 581

... boards of the designation of valid diagnostic tests pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. Even if this new definition were deemed applicable to the ...

docket:	a5002-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-04-16
status:	published
citation:	339 N.J. Super. 392
Document Size:	23199

50 STEVEN J. KOFF AND SHIELA A. KOFF V. BARBARA A. CARRUBBA -- rank: 579

... collided with an automobile is subject to the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, -8. Plaintiff's automobile was not involved in the accident ...

docket:	a396-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-05-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	19490

51 JULIE ANN KIMBLE v. DREW N. LAVISTA -- rank: 566

... her automobile insurance policy. The statutes governing this question are N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(k) ("Economic loss" is defined as "uncompensated loss of income ...

docket:	a2120-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35203

52 ENDO SURGI CENTER, P.C. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 543

... of the premium paid for the purchase of the policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2, -4 and -5. 3 N.J.A.C. 13:35 ...

docket:	a4611-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59168

53 RICHARD VANN v. MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 543

... policy form or endorsement covering an automobile as defined at N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2 shall include excess medical payments coverage, corresponding to Section II ...

docket:	a4264-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29346

54 WENDY N. FULLMAN v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 497

... that plaintiff was an income producer within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. Accordingly, we do not address that issue. 3 Allstate acknowledges ...

docket:	a3016-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32999

55 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1786-19.opn.html -- rank: 497

... a pedestrian death met the definition of an 'automobile' in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a). We concluded a A-1786-19 14 four-door ... conveyance for passengers nor rented to others with a driver,' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. Bello, 249 N.J. Super. at 36-37 (emphasis added ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	55456

56 EVILLIN LOPEZ v. PEARSON, INC., et al. -- rank: 494

... by two or more relatives resident in the same household. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a).] PIP benefits are available even if a minivan is ... of the accident was an automobile within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. R. 4:46-2(c). The proofs were so one ...

docket:	A1828-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-11-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45011

57 AAA MID-ATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. SWSNUJ WAREHOUSING INC -- rank: 489

... not required to maintain PIP coverage for the vehicle, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a), AAA was authorized by N.J.S.A. 39 ...

docket:	a2043-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12131

58 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BERNIE J. HARDY, KASON CHEEKS et al. -- rank: 487

... while occupying, entering into, alighting from or using an automobile." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2 defines an automobile in the following manner:     [A] private passenger ...

docket:	A1214-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-01-17
status:	published
citation:	357 N.J. Super. 19 813 A.2d 123
Document Size:	32163

59 SAMUEL A. MELIA et al. v. DANIEL WALSH -- rank: 466

... by two or more relatives resident in the same household. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a).] In the Law Division and on appeal, plaintiffs contend ... Toyota pickup truck qualifies as a private passenger vehicle under [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a)]. On August 22, 2005, plaintiffs filed a Notice of ...

docket:	a5482-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	62807

60 ANDRES SOLORZANO v. PETER SAPUNARICH, J&S DI -- rank: 438

... or business of the insured other than farming or ranching. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a).] On its face this definition of "automobile" does not ...

docket:	A2129-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-23
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	41129