Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 TAHIYYAH JONES v. NASER CITY TRANSPORTATION CORP., et al. -- rank: 431

... for passengers," such as taxis, from the coverage it requires. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. We also reject it because the quoted section does not ...

docket:	A1419-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-11-02
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	31874

62 CHARLES J. KRAUT v. ERICA F. DIGIOVANNI -- rank: 410

... the wagon was not a 'motor vehicle' as defined under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a); and (3) he thought his employer had insured the ...

docket:	a3664-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	7602

63 SIDOTI CHIROPRACTIC CENTER v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 377

... generally limited to accidents involving an 'automobile' as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2." Warnig v. Atlantic County Special Servs. , 363 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a6277-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-04-03
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	32107

64 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP v. NORTH JERSEY SURGERY CENTER -- rank: 339

... personal injury caused by accidents involving "a private passenger automobile." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(a), -4. 2 NAF is New Jersey's former No ...

docket:	a0824-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16925

65 HALINA PIASCIK v. TIFFANY LEIGH MARR et al. -- rank: 334

... because their vehicle was not an automobile as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. The judge reasoned: As such, the remaining question for the ...

docket:	A2270-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-02-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34902

66 JASPER T. LYMON v. CAPE TRANSIT CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 318

... definition of "automobiles" for purposes of the verbal threshold statute. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. They are, however, obligated to provide PIP benefits to their ...

docket:	a5773-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-05-11
status:	published
citation:	340 N.J. Super. 573
Document Size:	9166

67 MELISSA PAYOR v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 316

... ambiguous. She further contends that as a matter of law, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(g), an insured's spouse is deemed to be a ...

docket:	a3206-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8891

68 FORT LEE SURGERY CENTER, INC. v. PROFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 298

... correctly relied upon the definitions of medical necessity contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(m) and N.J.A.C. 11:3-4.2 ...

docket:	A3120-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23845

69 DENIS O'HARA v. ROYAL COACHMAN LEASING -- rank: 237

... a certification of permanency for purposes of the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2. Plaintiff also insists that defendants may not preserve the evidence ...

docket:	a5031-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-01-25
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31491