Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick LLC -- rank: 785

... 4 or 39:6A-10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], as a result of an accident occurring within this ...

docket:	a-33-14
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2016-01-05
status:
citation:
Document Size:	107061

17 HERIBERTO CABALLERO-GONZALEZ v. HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 782

... garaged in this State shall maintain automobile liability insurance coverage.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 (emphasis added); see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3(b); N.J.S.A. 39:6B ... Cadillac was principally garaged in New Jersey. 'The language of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, read literally, would require any owner or registered owner of ... owner is not required to maintain automobile insurance coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3[.]' Id. at 46-47 (citing Lilly v. Prudential Ins. Co ... 412)).] In Carmichael, where the vehicle was inoperable, we held N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 was 'not meant to apply to owners of vehicles 9 ... were decided under statutes and policies whose language differed from N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and the policy here. Some cases were decisions under ...

docket:	a0875-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64590

18 KEVIN ROBINSON v. MICHAEL ZORN -- rank: 780

... part of that effort, a special automobile insurance policy (SAIP), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. 3 A SAIP provides limited automobile insurance. The central ... policy did not provide third-party liability insurance, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3c. Plaintiff was ineligible to receive compensation under the New ... also reject plaintiff's contention that the SAIP, authorized by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, renders Ross nugatory. In 2002, Governor James McGreevey signed ... As part of the overall insurance reform, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, creating the SAIP. The bill stated that a. In ... occurred "after the events at issue." Id. at 141. 3 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 "creat[ed a] 'special' policy allowing certain low income ... 9 This is identical to the language currently used in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...

docket:	a3152-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-17
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 312 64 A.3d 571
Document Size:	48182

19 EXCHANGE v. SABRINA A. PEREZ -- rank: 780

... be reformed to the mandatory minimum liability insurance coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per occurrence ... 000 per injury and $30,000 per accident prescribed in [ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6A-3 and 39:6B-1. I conclude as well that the alternative coverage provided by the basic policy under [ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6A-3.2 mandates no minimum amount of liability coverage. It simply ... 000 per injury, $30,000 per accident as prescribed under [ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6A-3 and 39:6B-1. This appeal followed. On appeal, CURE ... an "alternative" to the mandatory coverage of the standard policy, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. The pertinent feature of the new limited basic policy ... an "optional liability insurance coverage" with a $10,000 limit. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c). In Mannion , supra , 380 N.J. Super. ...

docket:	a3100-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-13
status:	published
citation:	432 N.J.Super. 526 75 A.3d 1233
Document Size:	36937

20 FEDERICO BENCOSME v. JOSEPH KANNANKARA -- rank: 765

... was uninsured for medical expense benefits coverage as required under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, and -4. For most of the seven ...

docket:	a1672-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42650

21 MELVIN REID v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 765

... by New Jersey law for liability coverage set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. [(Emphasis supplied).] N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 provides that the minimum coverage limit for 'injury to, or ... 80,000 of available UIM coverage under its policy. 3 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 further prescribes a minimum coverage limit for 'injury to, or ... than one person, in any one accident' of $30,000, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3(b), and $5000 for 'damage to property in any one accident.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3(c). A-2401-18T2 4 Shortly thereafter, plaintiffs filed a ... resident relative,' as the policy contained only a reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. Id. at 4. We rejected NJM's argument that ...

docket:	a2401-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46024

22 Tyrone A. Huggins v. Mary E. Aquilar -- rank: 751

... N.J.S.A. 39:6B- 1(a). See also N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. Huggins held an automobile insurance policy with defendant and third ... N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). See also N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. NJM argued that Aquilar was a permissive user under the ... alteration of the minimum liability insurance requirement terms established by N.J.S.A. 39:6A- - 3 and :6B-1. The Commission responded that, while it is ... in adopting a safety- net regime of insurance. See also N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. While a step down in 19 coverage has been approved ...

docket:	a-78-19
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2021-04-21
status:
citation:
Document Size:	58153

23 New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. Hardy -- rank: 739

... of the ownership, maintenance, use or operation of an automobile.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, -3.1, and -4; N.J.S.A. 39:6B ...

docket:	a-79-02
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2004-01-27
status:
citation:	178 N.J. 327
Document Size:	45633

24 David Goyco v. Progressive Insurance Company \t \r\n\t\t \r\n \r\n\r\n\t\r\n -- rank: 734

... in” New Jersey “maintain automobile liability insurance coverage.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. And, of particular relevance here, the Act directs that every ...

docket:	a_12_23
court:	supreme
decided:	2024-05-13
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	51525

25 JANE NORCIA v. HIGH POINT INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 731

... the "subchapter" governing emergency medical care "implements the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and 39:6A-4 and 39:6A-4.3 ...

docket:	a1846-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41424

26 Christina DiProspero v. Barbara J. Penn, et al. -- rank: 724

... a serious life impact. Footnote: 7 The basic policy under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 provides less PIP coverage than in a standard policy ...

docket:	a-66-03
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2004-11-29
status:
citation:
Document Size:	73117

27 NICOLE PIERIDES v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 719

... New Jersey policies, either standard policies issued in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, which include the personal injury protection coverage described in N ... J.S.A. 39:6A-2, issued in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and N.J.A.C. 11:3-3. There ...

docket:	a2783-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	90263

28 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHERYL M. VARJABEDIAN, et al. -- rank: 717

... notwithstanding that policy on vehicle was declared void ab initio). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 requires every owner of a motor vehicle to maintain automobile ... non-compulsory option known as the "basic automobile insurance policy." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Under subsection a and b of that statute, the ... optional liability insurance coverage" with limits of $10,000. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 the insured "may elect" a basic policy "[a]s an alternative to the mandatory coverages" provided in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and -4. With the adoption of AICRA, N.J.S ... UM coverage. Along with the creation of the basic policy, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, drivers are required to have, and insurers are implicitly required ... may put their assets at risk if they are sued. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.2a. From the perspective of the insurers' obligation, the ...

docket:	a3372-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-03-22
status:	published
citation:	391 N.J. Super. 253
Document Size:	40988

29 JENNIFER LAMBERT v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 704

... and 39:6A-10], the medical expense benefits provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and the benefits provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3]." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-6. Nothing in ...

docket:	a1073-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-24
status:	published
citation:	447 N.J.Super. 61 145 A.3d 1095
Document Size:	46388

30 JOHN K. CUPIDO v. WILLIAM PEREZ -- rank: 702

... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and who is not otherwise eligible for such benefits ... requirements of [ N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1] or [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3], the uninsured motorist insurance requirements of [ N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a4557-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-27
status:
citation:	415 N.J. Super. 587 2 A.3d 1159
Document Size:	30499