Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 PETER A. LIQUARI, III v. JENNIFER COMBS -- rank: 695

... diagnostic tests, supported by the physician's clinical findings. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(a). Precertification is subject to regulatory approval by the ...

docket:	a3924-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64996

32 ARTHUR J. BROWNv. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 690

... New Jersey law for liability coverage as set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. In a July 20, 2011 cover letter, NJM provided Brown ... in UM/UIM coverage consistent with the statutory minimums under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. While the specific dollar limits in the A.7 exclusion ... that the A.7 exclusion is ambiguous because it cites N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 rather than specific dollar amounts. Courts will go beyond the ... references a statute does not render the policy overly technical. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 provides the minimum coverage amounts required under New Jersey law ... adequate notice because the word 'minimum' does not appear in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. In addition, they argue the statute does not include the ... provide notice of NJM's changes in UM/UIM coverage. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 provides every owner of an automobile registered or principally ...

docket:	a0842-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44975

33 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ULISES SABATO, M.D., et al. -- rank: 687

... of its policy. We observed in Coalition II that under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1a the adoption and approval of language that steer[s ...

docket:	A0380-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-10-03
status:	published
citation:	380 N.J. Super. 463 882 A.2d 972
Document Size:	62080

34 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, CO. -- rank: 680

... 39:6A-4 or -10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], as a result of an accident occurring within this ...

docket:	a5624-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-23
status:	Published
citation:	459 N.J.Super. 223 208 A.3d 888
Document Size:	30742

35 STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 678

... J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and 39:6A-10], [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], respectively, if additional first party coverage applies and any ...

docket:	a5972-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-04
status:	published
citation:	439 N.J.Super. 532 110 A.3d 132
Document Size:	24604

36 Omar Sanders v. Norma K. Langemeier, et al. and New Jersey Property-Liability -- rank: 670

... coverage known as the "Dollar-A-Day" 1 policy, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, has a right to seek reimbursement from the Unsatisfied ... passenger, was insured by a "special automobile insurance policy," see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, issued by defendant Clarendon National Insurance Company. That policy ... mandatory coverage[]" of the standard policy, affords more limited benefits. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. In particular, it provides "personal injury protection coverage" up ... as defined by the insurance policy for that automobile. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, -4. Because each of these types of ...

docket:	a-49-08
court:
decided:	2009-05-04
status:
citation:	199 N.J. 366 972 A.2d 1103
Document Size:	81551

37 Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company v. Robert LaCroix, et al. -- rank: 668

... identified above apply to “special” policies issued pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. None are relevant to the instant appeal. 8 New ...

docket:	a-128-06
court:
decided:	2008-05-14
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	88308

38 VANESSA RIVERA v. ELMER F. McCRAY, III -- rank: 665

... 2 . The issue presented is whether a "special policy," see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, which provides no UIM coverage at all, provides "similar ... J.S.A. 39:6B-1(c), and described in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, is available only to certain Medicaid recipients of limited ... law, a special policy "shall not provide . . . underinsured motorist coverage." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(c). The policy, sold to Rivera for $360 a ... party benefits for emergency medical expenses, and a death benefit. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(b). It was designed to provide a mechanism for ... comply with the compulsory insurance law, instead of driving uninsured. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(a). Although the NJM policy does not define "coverage ... she could have gone without her own insurance entirely. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 (compulsory insurance law pertains to "owner or registered owner ...

docket:	a2337-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-02
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 315 137 A.3d 1226
Document Size:	30280

39 ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. TRANS WARE, INC. -- rank: 665

... 6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], respectively, if additional first party coverage applies and any ...

docket:	a4853-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17948

40 TOSHIBA A. STRICKLEN v. ERMANNO FERRUGGIA -- rank: 660

... to "maintain automobile liability insurance coverage," including medical expense benefits. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, -3.1, -3.2 and -4; Martin v. Chhabra , 374 ... on the vehicle as mandated by our compulsory insurance statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. Judge Lombardi concluded that plaintiff's uncle implicitly acted as her agent in insuring the Explorer in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. Thus she should be subject to the verbal threshold tort ...

docket:	a4851-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-06-30
status:	published
citation:	379 N.J. Super. 296
Document Size:	63388

41 DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GENNADIY GISIS -- rank: 648

... 4 or 39:6A-10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], as a result of an accident occurring within this ...

docket:	a0951-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 295 21 A.3d 216
Document Size:	20713

42 RITA STARNER v. SCOTT HAEMMERLE -- rank: 636

... and 6B. See N.J.S.A. 39:3C- 20; N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3; N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. 3 In considering ... passenger automobiles, which are required to be insured pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, a separate ...

docket:	a0153-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23533

43 WILLIAM J. KAHLERT v. MELISSA A. BATTAGLIA -- rank: 629

... mandatory medical expense benefits coverage of $15,000 per person. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, -3.1, -3.3; see also Caviglia v. Royal Tours ...

docket:	a0535-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14250

44 UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS GROUP a/s/o HARLEY DAVIDSON OF EDISON v. GEORGE E. HEIBEL -- rank: 629

... 1999), we noted that "[t]he mandatory coverages enumerated in . . . N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, and describing the 'basic' policy, do not include comprehensive ...

docket:	a6285-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-20
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	58684

45 HERBERT HURTADO v. JENNIFER WILKINS -- rank: 624

... but fails to maintain medical expense benefits coverage mandated by [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, or -4] shall have no cause of ... in New Jersey is required to maintain such coverage. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 (stating 'every owner or registered owner of an automobile . . . shall ... would not separately refer to 'every owner or registered owner.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3; see Dziuba v. Fletcher, 382 N.J. Super. 73, 77 ...

docket:	a1866-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19886