Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 582

... insurers, HMOs, or governmental agency payors of either PIP or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 medical benefits, a right of reimbursement (as distinguished from ...

docket:	a4602-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-06-29
status:	published
citation:	341 N.J. Super. 528
Document Size:	16632

62 STEPHEN ROBERTS v. MALVYN ST. LOUIS -- rank: 578

... standard automobile liability insurance policy" to provide PIP coverage, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, allowing for the election of a "basic" automobile policy ...

docket:	a1173-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-11-17
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25568

63 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY v. COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC -- rank: 578

... A. 39:6A-10, or medical expense benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, as a result of an accident that occurred in ...

docket:	a5904-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 546 22 A.3d 91
Document Size:	18085

64 GERARD NORTESANO v. DAVID TORRES-ROMERO -- rank: 575

... of the ownership, maintenance, operation or use of an automobile." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, -3.1, and -4; N.J.S.A. 39:6B ...

docket:	A0521-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-12-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43924

65 NEWARK INSURANCE COMPANY v. VALORA'S SECOND CAR CENTER -- rank: 575

... is required to maintain automobile liability insurance upon those cars, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, and that coverage must include PIP benefits, N.J.S ... Green acquired title, such coverage would not be required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and -4, and thus, Valora's would not be a ...

docket:	a6085-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-02-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	46402

66 RICHARD P. BADUINI et al. v. STEPHINA SERINA -- rank: 575

... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3], the uninsured motorist insurance requirements of [ N.J.S.A ...

docket:	A3842-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-03-10
status:	published
citation:	375 N.J. Super. 478 868 A.2d 372
Document Size:	21593

67 MID-ATLANTIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATES v. ROBERT DENT -- rank: 573

... 39:6A-4 and -10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] it has paid. [L.1983, c. 362 ยง 9 ...

docket:	a0573-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27261

68 PANTANO & ROSSI CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. v. 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 570

... PRCC therefore maintained that in light of the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.2, 39:6A-4, and 39:6A-23, the mandatory ... 15,000 level because, in keeping with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, 39:6A-4 and N.J.A.C. 11 ...

docket:	a4499-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20142

69 YVETTE M. CARMICHAEL & GERALD CARMICHAEL, ET AL -- rank: 568

... of P.L.1972, c. 70 (C. 39:6A-8). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 speaks to the issue of who must maintain the required ... owners of vehicles that are not operable.      The language of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, read literally, would require any owner or registered owner of ... interpreting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, the statutes at issue in this case, are not meant ... owner is not required to maintain automobile insurance coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and should not be subject to the verbal threshold under ...

docket:	a4953-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-03-17
status:	published
citation:	310 N.J.Super. 34
Document Size:	25704

70 DENISE V. THOMAS v. MARIA BOBADILLA -- rank: 568

... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 ] and who is not otherwise eligible for such benefits ...

docket:	a1834-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16413

71 HOWARD MARTIN v. NIRAJ CHHABRA -- rank: 551

... to "maintain automobile liability insurance coverage," including medical expense benefits. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, 3.2 and 4; see Beaugard v. Johnson , 281 ...

docket:	a4256-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-01-21
status:	published
citation:	374 N.J. Super. 387
Document Size:	24042

72 COMPREHENSIVE PAIN SOLUTIONS OF NEW JERSEY PC v. OMNI INSURANCE COMPANY c/o GOOD 2 GO AUTO INSURANCE -- rank: 546

... of [N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a)] or [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3], the uninsured motorist insurance requirements of [N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a0862-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-03-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27139

73 HASSANNAH BOWE v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 541

... 6A-4 provides in pertinent part: Except as provided by [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1], every standard automobile liability insurance policy. . . shall contain personal ...

docket:	a4282-02
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-02-24
status:	published
citation:	367 N.J. Super. 128
Document Size:	29902

74 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4860-17.opn.html -- rank: 534

... should have treated the matter as a summary judgment application. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 requires that all owners of motor vehicles registered in this ... if a New Jersey resident is not in compliance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, or -4, and specifically states: Any person ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	15161

75 COOPER HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 531

... 000 per accident in property damage as set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and 39:6B-1; (2) uninsured motorist coverage in the ...

docket:	A1861-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-06-27
status:	published
citation:	378 N.J. Super. 510 876 A.2d 335
Document Size:	53955