Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 CONSUMER FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBERT T. LEE -- rank: 521

... as required by the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. Lastly, we vacate the award of counsel fees in the ... are $15,000 per person and $30,000 per occurrence. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. As we have previously said, "[A] carrier is not entitled ...

docket:	a5821-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-02-24
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	53796

77 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 521

... automobile insurance policy" as one with the coverage required in N.J.S.A . 39:6A-3 and -4. N . J . S .A. 39:6A-3 requires every owner or registered owner of an automobile garaged ...

docket:	A1178-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56992

78 GAIL BROWN v. FANNIE Y. WILLIAMS, et al. -- rank: 521

... a basic policy which provided pedestrian PIP as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, prior to that statute being amended on June 9 ...

docket:	A3029-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-13
status:	published
citation:	394 N.J. Super. 507 927 A.2d 579
Document Size:	53899

79 KHALID SANDERS v. JASMIN REYES -- rank: 519

... S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -32, in particular, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and the mandatory auto insurance provisions contained in N ...

docket:	a3878-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17611

80 GUARO SOLANO, TANGELA MOORE et al. v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION -- rank: 517

... purchased a "basic policy" of automobile insurance, as defined in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, that did not contain optional uninsured motorists ("UM") coverage ... coverage options, a basic policy and a standard policy." Ibid . N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 describes in detail the coverage features, both mandatory and optional, of the "basic policy." By way of summary, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1a requires the "basic policy" to provide a limited version of Personal Injury Protection ("PIP"). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1c, however, provides a person purchasing a "basic policy" with ... with a policy in force which is insured pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1]." Ibid . Once plaintiffs are determined to fall within the ...

docket:	A1471-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-08-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32357

81 SWARNLATA KHANDELWAL v. ZURICH INSURANCE CO -- rank: 507

... S.A. 39:6-46(a) has been replaced by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, which requires coverage for "loss resulting from liability imposed by ...

docket:	a2620-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-29
status:	published
citation:	427 N.J. Super. 577 50 A.3d 52
Document Size:	48710

82 REPOSSESSION SPECIALISTS v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 507

... the compulsory insurance requirement by purchasing a "basic" policy under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1b that includes no mandatory liability coverage); N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 adopted by L. 2003, c. 89, § 45 (creating ...

docket:	a2712-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-12
status:	published
citation:	423 N.J. Super. 518 33 A.3d 1242
Document Size:	29667

83 JOHN BAKER v. J.J. DELUCA COMPANY, INC. -- rank: 499

... which we supplement with the following discussion. Celadon acknowledges that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 establish mandatory ...

docket:	a4922-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63441

84 PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. v. ZURICH INSURANCE, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY -- rank: 495

... integral part of the loading and unloading of the vehicle. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 provide that ...

docket:	a6204-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	105944

85 NANCY GRANATA v. DEMI RASIZER -- rank: 487

... by New Jersey law for liability coverage set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3." The declaration sheet of the revised policy, like the prior ... by New Jersey law for liability coverage set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. At oral argument, it was suggested that if a policyholder ... if a policyholder had gone to a library and found N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, that section would not provide the requisite clarity for a ...

docket:	a1855-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23504

86 JOSE L. CHAVEZ v. THE PROFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 487

... requirements of [ N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1] or [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3], the uninsured motorist insurance requirements of [ N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a5665-06
court:
decided:	2008-08-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42147

87 CHRISTOPHER COX v. KRYSTAL TOMASSO -- rank: 478

... New Jersey law for liability coverage as set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.'4 NJM denied plaintiff's UIM claim on the basis ... requires minimum liability coverage of $15,000 per person injured. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3(a). A-0106-17T2 3 The trial judge granted NJM ...

docket:	a0106-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18587

88 JOSE ECHEVERRI v. -- rank: 468

... test was based have not been modified under AICRA. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, -4, -8(a), N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 ...

docket:	a4190-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-03-14
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	17044

89 LINDA D'ALOIA v. SANDRA M. GEORGE -- rank: 448

... expense benefits under a basic automobile insurance policy pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and amounts collectible or paid for benefits under a ...

docket:	A1938-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-10-12
status:	published
citation:	372 N.J. Super. 246 858 A.2d 16
Document Size:	14806

90 AUGUSTINE W. BADIALI v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 446

... Law of New Jersey, mentioned in the policy, refers to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, which fixes the monetary threshold at $15,000. 2 The ...

docket:	a2795-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-28
status:	published
citation:	429 N.J.Super. 121 57 A.3d 37
Document Size:	23692