Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS GROUP a/s/o HARLEY DAVIDSON OF EDISON v. GEORGE E. HEIBEL -- rank: 727

... 1999), we noted that "[t]he mandatory coverages enumerated in . . . N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, and describing the 'basic' policy, do not include comprehensive and ...

docket:	a6285-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-20
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	58684

17 Edward Zabilowicz v. Roslyne Kelsey -- rank: 723

... S.A. 17:28-1.4, the Deemer Statute, and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, or -3.4. Unless the defendant meets this ... J.S.A. 39:6A-4], personal injury protection coverage, [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1], medical expense benefits coverage, or [N.J.S.A. 39 ... S.A. 39:6A-4], medical expense benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A ... receive benefits under [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4], [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, or -3.4. Unless the defendant meets this ...

docket:	a-87-08
court:	supreme
decided:	2009-12-17
status:
citation:	200 N.J. 507 984 A.2d 872
Document Size:	25378

18 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHERYL M. VARJABEDIAN, et al. -- rank: 723

... non-compulsory option known as the "basic automobile insurance policy." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Under subsection a and b of that statute, the basic ... optional liability insurance coverage" with limits of $10,000. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 the insured "may elect" a basic policy "[a]s an ... appeal, both of whom are covered with standard policies. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 mandates no minimum amount of liability coverage. It only provides ...

docket:	a3372-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-03-22
status:	published
citation:	391 N.J. Super. 253
Document Size:	40988

19 NICOLE PIERIDES v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 720

... J.S.A. 39:6A-2, issued in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and N.J.A.C. 11:3-3. There is ...

docket:	a2783-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	90263

20 ALMA GUERRERO v. HELEN COLLEEN MOORE -- rank: 715

... PIP coverage up to $15,000 per person, per accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Low income individuals, who are either eligible or enrolled in ... if a New Jersey resident is not in compliance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, or N ... did not have an insurance policy that complied with either N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4; therefore, plaintiff ... amount is $10,000 less than what is required under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and $245,000 less than what is required under N ... insurance did not have the required PIP coverage mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Both plaintiff ...

docket:	a4197-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24923

21 STEPHANIE JOSEPHS v. CHRISTINA M. HEPP -- rank: 711

... J.S.A. 39:6A-3. The judge noted that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 allows owners of automobiles to select a basic insurance policy ... coverage mandated by [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] shall ... benefits of $15,000 per person, per accident, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, or qualifies for a special auto insurance policy under N ... 1474-18T1 9 $250,000[.]' Moreover, as we have noted, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 allows owners of automobiles principally registered in New Jersey to ... coverage mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. Because ...

docket:	a1474-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31346

22 JOHN K. CUPIDO v. WILLIAM PEREZ -- rank: 699

... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and who is not otherwise eligible for such benefits, whenever ...

docket:	a4557-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-27
status:
citation:	415 N.J. Super. 587 2 A.3d 1159
Document Size:	30499

23 Omar Sanders v. Norma K. Langemeier, et al. and New Jersey Property-Liability -- rank: 696

... mandatory coverage[]" of the standard policy, affords more limited benefits. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. In particular, it provides "personal injury protection coverage" up to ... as defined by the insurance policy for that automobile. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, -4. Because each of these types of policies ...

docket:	a-49-08
court:
decided:	2009-05-04
status:
citation:	199 N.J. 366 972 A.2d 1103
Document Size:	81551

24 Christina DiProspero v. Barbara J. Penn, et al. -- rank: 692

... a serious life impact. Footnote: 7 The basic policy under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 provides less PIP coverage than in a standard policy, N ...

docket:	a-66-03
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2004-11-29
status:
citation:
Document Size:	73117

25 JOSHUA HAINES v. JACOB W TAFT -- rank: 689

... expense benefits under a basic automobile insurance policy pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and amounts collectible or paid for benefits under a special ...

docket:	a5503-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-27
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	52745

26 A-0NELSON R. NELSON v. RIDER INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY August 11, 2015 -- rank: 687

... subject accident, a basic automobile liability policy as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1[.]" Allstate filed a motion for summary judgment seeking precisely this ... has a separate basic automobile insurance policy, as permitted by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, and the vehicle insured through the basic policy is not ... Legislature's creation of the basic automobile insurance policy in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. A step-down provision in a standard policy cannot be ... of the insured also having a basic automobile policy under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. In the interest of clarity, we reiterate the following undisputed ... Plaintiff also had a basic automobile policy as defined in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, which was issued by Progressive to cover a "1994 Mazda ... under any Basic automobile insurance policy, issued in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and N.J.A.C. 11:3-3." Relying ...

docket:	a0729-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22090

27 AIG CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GREGORY R. THOMPSON -- rank: 677

... however, had procured from AIG a basic automobile insurance policy, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, which provided PIP medical expense coverage of $15,000 per ...

docket:	a4358-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23003

28 DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GENNADIY GISIS -- rank: 668

... 4 or 39:6A-10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A ...

docket:	a0951-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 295 21 A.3d 216
Document Size:	20713

29 PETER A. LIQUARI, III v. JENNIFER COMBS -- rank: 661

... diagnostic tests, supported by the physician's clinical findings. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(a). Precertification is subject to regulatory approval by the Commissioner ...

docket:	a3924-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64996

30 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1312-18.opn.html -- rank: 651

... the Deemer statute, the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, established the creation of two insurance coverage options A-1312 ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	29766