Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

121 STEVEN J. KOFF AND SHIELA A. KOFF V. BARBARA A. CARRUBBA -- rank: 561

... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a, -3; see also N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. A person has the right to receive PIP benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 if (1) he or she is the named insured under ... a school bus is not an “automobile” as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Citing Weiss v. Thomas , supra , Beaugard pointed out that a ... personal injury plaintiff and her eligibility for PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 are alternative criteria for subjecting her to the verbal threshold ... owner, registrant, operator or occupant of an automobile to which [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] applies” is subject to the verbal threshold with respect to ...

docket:	a396-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-05-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	19490

122 HASSANNAH BOWE v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 561

... whether a plaintiff seeking Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 must prove that the treatment she received was causally related ... her injuries and the automobile accident triggering coverage. We disagree.      N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 provides in pertinent part: Except as provided by [ N.J ... phrase "bodily injury as a result of an accident" in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, requires an insured seeking PIP benefits to causally link the ... reaching this conclusion, we distinguish PIP benefit cases brought under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 from the line of cases which have examined the aggravation ...

docket:	a4282-02
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-02-24
status:	published
citation:	367 N.J. Super. 128
Document Size:	29902

123 GEICO v. JACQUELINE NELSON -- rank: 559

... vehicle of the named insured with that person's permission. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. "The protection of innocent third parties is a primary concern ...

docket:	a0638-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37582

124 KENNETH FRANCO, v. FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY -- rank: 559

... contention that plaintiff was precluded from bringing a suit under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(b) because plaintiff had pled guilty to driving while intoxicated. Id. at 416-17. A-3055-18 24 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(b) bars a person who is convicted of or ...

docket:	a3055-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-25
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	70910

125 FREDRICK LEDRICH, v. LILLIAN L. KIER -- rank: 557

... form her own expectations and desires as to independent living.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 provides in relevant part: [E]very standard automobile liability insurance ... considered whether the PIP claimant was an 'income producer' under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(b) and rejected a 'parsimonious reading' of the statute. 86 ... Casualty Insurance Company, we considered the meaning of 'household' under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. 260 N.J. Super. 159 (App. Div. 1992). We reiterated ...

docket:	a2722-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-04-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35775

126 HALINA JABLONOWSKA v. DAVID P. SUTHER et al. -- rank: 557

... shall be performed in accordance with medical protocols pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] and the use of valid diagnostic tests administered in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7]. Such testing may not be experimental in nature or ...

docket:	A0462-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-02-13
status:	published
citation:	390 N.J. Super. 395 915 A.2d 617
Document Size:	31297

127 IFA INSURANCE COMPANY v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 554

... carrier that is also required to provide PIP coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The Supreme Court concluded that the carrier that paid the ... insurance carrier that has paid out PIP benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 See footnote 3 3 from receiving contribution from other carriers potentially liable under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -11."     Based on the foregoing, we are constrained to conclude ... relevant to this appeal. Footnote: 2      2 Footnote: 3     3 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 states, in relevant part:         [T]he personal injury protection ...

docket:	a6089-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-06-01
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	14198

128 COACH USA, INC., CAPE TRANSIT CORPORATION AND LEISURE LINE, INC. v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 554

... relevant part, as follows:         An insurer . . . paying benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3, 39:6A-4, 39:6A-10, or 39:6A ...

docket:	A0250-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-10-01
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	18357

129 ENDO SURGICAL CENTER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 554

... That statute provides in pertinent part: The benefits provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10] . . . shall be ... military personnel shall be deducted from the benefits collectible under [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -10] . . . . If an insurer has paid those benefits and ... disability benefits for a reimbursement of any benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -10] . . . it has paid. One of the purposes of ...

docket:	a2146-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-12-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44703

130 FREDERICK MONROE VS CITY OF PATERSON & ET ALS -- rank: 552

... At the core of this case is the application of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. PIP coverage includes medical expense benefits, income continuation benefits, essential ... at 516.]     There was a legislative response. The Legislature amended N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a (section 4.5) in 1997. L. 1997, c.151 ...

docket:	a4235-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-03-01
status:	published
citation:	318 N.J.Super. 505
Document Size:	15893

131 ARTHUR L. HARRIATT v. CYNTHIA A. SCOTT, et al. -- rank: 549

... not "required to maintain personal injury protection coverage pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4]." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8. Moreover, the record ... are aware that there is something of an anomaly here. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 obviously requires a corporation owning a passenger vehicle, as defined ...

docket:	a4847-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-23
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	45797

132 Fu v. Fu -- rank: 547

... without regard to negligence, liability or fault of any kind,” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, to the named insured, family members, and other persons injured ...

docket:	a-209-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-07-26
status:
citation:	160 N.J. 108
Document Size:	127915

133 DENTISTS FOR QUALITY CARE, INC. et al. v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF DENTISTRY, Respondent. -- rank: 547

... in N.J.S.A. 45:6-19.4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7 to adopt rules and regulations. 31 N.J.R ... violate the express legislative authority vested in the Board by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7 and the implied legislative authority reposed in it by ... S REGULATION EXCEEDS THE SCOPE OF ITS STATUTORY AUTHORITY UNDER N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7 by failing to limit the scope of its regulation ... a regional basis for the reimbursement of health care providers[,]" N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7, each of the professional licensing boards governing health care ... question concerning the Board's authority, beyond that provided in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7, to regulate diagnostic tests for traumatically-induced TMD, we ...

docket:	a4348-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-04-10
status:	published
citation:	339 N.J. Super. 257
Document Size:	20921

134 HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH v. CITIZENS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE -- rank: 547

... policies provide PIP coverage, including payment of 'reasonable medical expenses,' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a). Cobo v. Market Transition Facility, 293 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a1486-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23057

135 SARA THOMPSON et al. v. JOSEPH L. POTENZA, et al. -- rank: 540

... owner, registrant, operator or occupant of an automobile to which [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] . . . applies, and every person or organization legally responsible for his ... omissions" is entitled to the threshold defense. Both versions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 also dictate that PIP coverage extends to the owners of ...

docket:	A2211-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-12-05
status:	published
citation:	364 N.J. Super. 462 837 A.2d 378
Document Size:	25686