Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 IFA INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBERT E. HILL -- rank: 540

... the named insured "without regard to . . . fault of any kind," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. An insurer that pays PIP benefits is also entitled to ... to satisfy at least the [PIP] benefits coverage pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] . . . whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ...

docket:	a5405-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14995

137 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. SPECIALTY SURGICAL CENTER OF NORTH BRUNSWICK -- rank: 540

... insurers must provide in 'every standard automobile liability insurance policy.' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. A-0319-17T1 2 I. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6(a) requires the Department of Banking and Insurance (the ... of its biennial review of the fee schedules required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6. [ 44 N.J.R. 383(a).] In November 2012 ...

docket:	a0319-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-29
status:	Published
citation:	458 N.J.Super. 63 202 A.3d 672
Document Size:	29438

138 DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL CONSULTANTS v. ANDREI GAVRILINE -- rank: 540

... respective obligations of auto insurer, insured and medical provider. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. At issue in plaintiff's Law Division action, on the ...

docket:	A1245-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40387

139 PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY , v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 540

... corporation providing health insurance benefits to its insureds. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d), plaintiff allows its customers to designate their health ... responsible for paying medical expenses arising out of automobile accidents. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d). Choosing the health care insurance-as-primary option ... the insured's car insurance premiums. A-2830-19 7 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(f). Health insurers, in turn, are prohibited from including ...

docket:	a2830-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-27
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	29518

140 SEAVIEW ORTHOPAEDICS v. NATIONAL HEALTHCARE RESOURCES, INC., et al. -- rank: 538

... fault of any kind" of the insured (or family members). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Its goal was to compensate "a larger class of citizens ... was its rewriting of the fee schedule provisions contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 to incorporate the reasonable and prevailing fees of 75 ...

docket:	a3599-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-02-13
status:	published
citation:	366 N.J. Super. 501
Document Size:	41622

141 DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GENNADIY GISIS -- rank: 535

... pays benefits pursuant to subsection a., b. or d. of [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], personal injury protection benefits in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or 39:6A-10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N ...

docket:	a0951-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 295 21 A.3d 216
Document Size:	20713

142 INGERSOLL V. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY -- rank: 533

... attorneys). PER CURIAM     The New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 (section 4.2). That statute prohibits recovery of personal ... basic PIP coverage of his automobile policy with JUA. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -2a. However, in keeping with the regulatory mandate of the ...

docket:	a-21-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1994-12-13
status:
citation:	138 N.J. 236
Document Size:	27464

143 PANTANO & ROSSI CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. v. 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 530

... carrier, defendant 21st Century Insurance Group, which, by virtue of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, also provided Ramirez with PIP benefits. Defendant assigned a claim ...

docket:	a4499-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20142

144 ALLIED NEUROLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PAIN PRACTICE P.C. v. IFA INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 526

... raised in Allied's appeal. Reversed and dismissed. 1 See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (mandating PIP coverage). 2 The bills were reduced pursuant to ...

docket:	a4966-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18845

145 Thomas DeMarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.P.M. -- rank: 526

... protection (PIP) benefits of an individual automobile liability insurance policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. An injured person with no recourse to any insurance coverage ... 19. The father was required to purchase PIP coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3. Lacroix , supra , 194 N.J. at 532. We held ...

docket:	A-104-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-12-01
status:
citation:	219 N.J. 131 97 A.3d 663
Document Size:	148694

146 HECTOR REYES v. JOHN STANLEY -- rank: 526

... Agha v. Feiner, 198 N.J. 50, 60-61 (2009); N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7; N.J.A.C. 11:3-4.5. The ...

docket:	a4498-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22752

147 JERMAINE A. THOMAS v. JAMES M. CONTESSA -- rank: 526

... The jury concluded plaintiff had suffered a "permanent" injury, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, as a result of the accident and awarded plaintiff $675 ...

docket:	a2453-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43233

148 JUDITH MONTEMAYOR v. JAMES S. SIGNORELLI, et al. -- rank: 526

... her insured father's "family residing in his household." See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Moreover, because plaintiff is an "immediate family member" residing in ...

docket:	A2435-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-04-19
status:	published
citation:	339 N.J. Super. 482
Document Size:	22948

149 RITA STARNER v. SCOTT HAEMMERLE -- rank: 526

... buggy was an 'automobile' within the meaning of the Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. 180 N.J. Super. 146, 149 (App. Div. 1981). The ...

docket:	a0153-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23533

150 FERMINA IBARRA V. JASON J. VETRANO, ET AL. -- rank: 523

... Plaintiff was entitled to personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 because she sustained an injury "arising out of ownership, operation ... not required to maintain personal injury protection coverage." Section 8b; N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The issue, therefore, was whether plaintiff was "an immediate family ... or (ii) has a right to receive PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4." Id. at 168. We determined that Beaugard did not qualify ... compensated for medical expenses and the other losses defined in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The verbal threshold, however, is optional, and the Legislature has ...

docket:	a3243-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	13183